Comparison of Two Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Occluders for Device Healing and Nickel Release in a Chronic Porcine Model

Aims. To investigate the healing process and nickel release of the Hyperion occluder (Comed BV, Netherlands), as compared to the Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) in a chronic swine model. Background. Some long-term complications occurring after percutaneous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zakaria Jalal, Younes Boudjemline, Xavier Iriart, Pierre-Emmanuel Seguela, Samantha Delmond, Virgine Loyer, David Gonthier, Olivier Bernus, Marlène Durand, Laurence Bordenave, Jean-Benoit Thambo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8413831
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849412625230725120
author Zakaria Jalal
Younes Boudjemline
Xavier Iriart
Pierre-Emmanuel Seguela
Samantha Delmond
Virgine Loyer
David Gonthier
Olivier Bernus
Marlène Durand
Laurence Bordenave
Jean-Benoit Thambo
author_facet Zakaria Jalal
Younes Boudjemline
Xavier Iriart
Pierre-Emmanuel Seguela
Samantha Delmond
Virgine Loyer
David Gonthier
Olivier Bernus
Marlène Durand
Laurence Bordenave
Jean-Benoit Thambo
author_sort Zakaria Jalal
collection DOAJ
description Aims. To investigate the healing process and nickel release of the Hyperion occluder (Comed BV, Netherlands), as compared to the Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) in a chronic swine model. Background. Some long-term complications occurring after percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) closure may be partially associated with an inappropriate healing of the device and increased nickel release. There is no direct comparative study of different occluders for healing and nickel release. Methods. After percutaneous ASD creation, 12 pigs were implanted with 15 mm Hyperion (n = 6) and 15 mm ASO (n = 6) devices. After 1 month (n = 3 for each device) and 3 months (n = 3 for each device) of follow-up, device explantation was performed and healing was assessed using histopathological workup. Systemic and tissular nickel release was performed. Results. Implantation was successful in 100% without complications. Device coverage was observed as early as 1 month after implantation and was almost complete after 3 months. A granulation tissue with a predominantly mononuclear inflammatory reaction was observed in contact with nitinol wires while an inflammatory reaction was seen in contact with textile fibers. We found no statistically significant difference between the 2 devices whether for histological grading scores or systemic nickel release, regardless to follow-up duration. Conclusions. In this preclinical study, we demonstrated that Amplatzer septal occluder and Hyperion occluder were not significantly different for device healing and nickel release processes.
format Article
id doaj-art-5f376a3d8f45441fa9fcad3c34a81c02
institution Kabale University
issn 0896-4327
1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-5f376a3d8f45441fa9fcad3c34a81c022025-08-20T03:34:22ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832020-01-01202010.1155/2020/84138318413831Comparison of Two Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Occluders for Device Healing and Nickel Release in a Chronic Porcine ModelZakaria Jalal0Younes Boudjemline1Xavier Iriart2Pierre-Emmanuel Seguela3Samantha Delmond4Virgine Loyer5David Gonthier6Olivier Bernus7Marlène Durand8Laurence Bordenave9Jean-Benoit Thambo10Department of Paediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology, Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac F-33600, Bordeaux, FranceCardiac Catheterization Laboratories, Sidra Cardiac Program, Sidra Medical & Research Center, Doha, QatarDepartment of Paediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology, Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac F-33600, Bordeaux, FranceDepartment of Paediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology, Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac F-33600, Bordeaux, FranceCHU de Bordeaux, CIC 1401, Bordeaux F-33000, FranceIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, Pessac F-33600, Bordeaux, FranceIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, Pessac F-33600, Bordeaux, FranceIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, Pessac F-33600, Bordeaux, FranceCHU de Bordeaux, CIC 1401, Bordeaux F-33000, FranceCHU de Bordeaux, CIC 1401, Bordeaux F-33000, FranceDepartment of Paediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology, Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Pessac F-33600, Bordeaux, FranceAims. To investigate the healing process and nickel release of the Hyperion occluder (Comed BV, Netherlands), as compared to the Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) in a chronic swine model. Background. Some long-term complications occurring after percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) closure may be partially associated with an inappropriate healing of the device and increased nickel release. There is no direct comparative study of different occluders for healing and nickel release. Methods. After percutaneous ASD creation, 12 pigs were implanted with 15 mm Hyperion (n = 6) and 15 mm ASO (n = 6) devices. After 1 month (n = 3 for each device) and 3 months (n = 3 for each device) of follow-up, device explantation was performed and healing was assessed using histopathological workup. Systemic and tissular nickel release was performed. Results. Implantation was successful in 100% without complications. Device coverage was observed as early as 1 month after implantation and was almost complete after 3 months. A granulation tissue with a predominantly mononuclear inflammatory reaction was observed in contact with nitinol wires while an inflammatory reaction was seen in contact with textile fibers. We found no statistically significant difference between the 2 devices whether for histological grading scores or systemic nickel release, regardless to follow-up duration. Conclusions. In this preclinical study, we demonstrated that Amplatzer septal occluder and Hyperion occluder were not significantly different for device healing and nickel release processes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8413831
spellingShingle Zakaria Jalal
Younes Boudjemline
Xavier Iriart
Pierre-Emmanuel Seguela
Samantha Delmond
Virgine Loyer
David Gonthier
Olivier Bernus
Marlène Durand
Laurence Bordenave
Jean-Benoit Thambo
Comparison of Two Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Occluders for Device Healing and Nickel Release in a Chronic Porcine Model
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Comparison of Two Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Occluders for Device Healing and Nickel Release in a Chronic Porcine Model
title_full Comparison of Two Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Occluders for Device Healing and Nickel Release in a Chronic Porcine Model
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Occluders for Device Healing and Nickel Release in a Chronic Porcine Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Occluders for Device Healing and Nickel Release in a Chronic Porcine Model
title_short Comparison of Two Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Occluders for Device Healing and Nickel Release in a Chronic Porcine Model
title_sort comparison of two percutaneous atrial septal defect occluders for device healing and nickel release in a chronic porcine model
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8413831
work_keys_str_mv AT zakariajalal comparisonoftwopercutaneousatrialseptaldefectoccludersfordevicehealingandnickelreleaseinachronicporcinemodel
AT younesboudjemline comparisonoftwopercutaneousatrialseptaldefectoccludersfordevicehealingandnickelreleaseinachronicporcinemodel
AT xavieririart comparisonoftwopercutaneousatrialseptaldefectoccludersfordevicehealingandnickelreleaseinachronicporcinemodel
AT pierreemmanuelseguela comparisonoftwopercutaneousatrialseptaldefectoccludersfordevicehealingandnickelreleaseinachronicporcinemodel
AT samanthadelmond comparisonoftwopercutaneousatrialseptaldefectoccludersfordevicehealingandnickelreleaseinachronicporcinemodel
AT virgineloyer comparisonoftwopercutaneousatrialseptaldefectoccludersfordevicehealingandnickelreleaseinachronicporcinemodel
AT davidgonthier comparisonoftwopercutaneousatrialseptaldefectoccludersfordevicehealingandnickelreleaseinachronicporcinemodel
AT olivierbernus comparisonoftwopercutaneousatrialseptaldefectoccludersfordevicehealingandnickelreleaseinachronicporcinemodel
AT marlenedurand comparisonoftwopercutaneousatrialseptaldefectoccludersfordevicehealingandnickelreleaseinachronicporcinemodel
AT laurencebordenave comparisonoftwopercutaneousatrialseptaldefectoccludersfordevicehealingandnickelreleaseinachronicporcinemodel
AT jeanbenoitthambo comparisonoftwopercutaneousatrialseptaldefectoccludersfordevicehealingandnickelreleaseinachronicporcinemodel