Ethical issues in the use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system: a systematic review

BackgroundThe use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system remains a subject of ongoing debate. Since behavioral genetic evidence is often used in criminal defense arguments, it is crucial to critically examine the ethical challenges associated with its applicatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pietro Refolo, Stefano Ferracuti, Simone Grassi, Costanza Raimondi, Giulia Mercuri, Massimo Zedda, Giovanni Aulino, Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo, Antonio Oliva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2025.1599750/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850190054732857344
author Pietro Refolo
Pietro Refolo
Stefano Ferracuti
Simone Grassi
Costanza Raimondi
Giulia Mercuri
Massimo Zedda
Massimo Zedda
Giovanni Aulino
Giovanni Aulino
Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo
Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo
Antonio Oliva
Antonio Oliva
author_facet Pietro Refolo
Pietro Refolo
Stefano Ferracuti
Simone Grassi
Costanza Raimondi
Giulia Mercuri
Massimo Zedda
Massimo Zedda
Giovanni Aulino
Giovanni Aulino
Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo
Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo
Antonio Oliva
Antonio Oliva
author_sort Pietro Refolo
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThe use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system remains a subject of ongoing debate. Since behavioral genetic evidence is often used in criminal defense arguments, it is crucial to critically examine the ethical challenges associated with its application.ObjectiveThis article seeks to identify and analyze these ethical concerns to ensure the responsible and equitable integration of genetic testing, when deemed necessary, into the judiciary system.MethodsA systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists to identify additional relevant studies.ResultsThe search yielded 1,023 publications, 12 of which met the inclusion criteria. Seven key ethical concerns were identified: the risks of discrimination, stigmatization, eugenic reasoning, deterministic interpretations, overestimation of dangerousness, privacy violations, and medicalization, along with the risks posed by limited scientific literacy among legal professionals.ConclusionThe ethical challenges associated with genetic predictions of aggressive behavior underscore the need for a critical and multidisciplinary approach to their use in the criminal justice system. Collaboration among bioethicists, legal scholars, scientists, and communication experts is crucial to prevent misuse and reduce potential biases. Such an approach will help ensure that genetic insights are ethically applied, accurately interpreted, and used to promote justice rather than exacerbate systemic inequalities.
format Article
id doaj-art-5f29a708192f4cd29bd4ecacd8083076
institution OA Journals
issn 1664-8021
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Genetics
spelling doaj-art-5f29a708192f4cd29bd4ecacd80830762025-08-20T02:15:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212025-05-011610.3389/fgene.2025.15997501599750Ethical issues in the use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system: a systematic reviewPietro Refolo0Pietro Refolo1Stefano Ferracuti2Simone Grassi3Costanza Raimondi4Giulia Mercuri5Massimo Zedda6Massimo Zedda7Giovanni Aulino8Giovanni Aulino9Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo10Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo11Antonio Oliva12Antonio Oliva13Department of Health Care Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyResearch Centre for Clinical Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Human Neurosciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Health Science, Section of Forensic Medical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyDepartment of Health Care Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Health Care Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Health Care Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Health Care Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Health Care Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyResearch Centre for Clinical Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Health Care Surveillance and Bioethics, Section of Legal Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, ItalyBackgroundThe use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system remains a subject of ongoing debate. Since behavioral genetic evidence is often used in criminal defense arguments, it is crucial to critically examine the ethical challenges associated with its application.ObjectiveThis article seeks to identify and analyze these ethical concerns to ensure the responsible and equitable integration of genetic testing, when deemed necessary, into the judiciary system.MethodsA systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists to identify additional relevant studies.ResultsThe search yielded 1,023 publications, 12 of which met the inclusion criteria. Seven key ethical concerns were identified: the risks of discrimination, stigmatization, eugenic reasoning, deterministic interpretations, overestimation of dangerousness, privacy violations, and medicalization, along with the risks posed by limited scientific literacy among legal professionals.ConclusionThe ethical challenges associated with genetic predictions of aggressive behavior underscore the need for a critical and multidisciplinary approach to their use in the criminal justice system. Collaboration among bioethicists, legal scholars, scientists, and communication experts is crucial to prevent misuse and reduce potential biases. Such an approach will help ensure that genetic insights are ethically applied, accurately interpreted, and used to promote justice rather than exacerbate systemic inequalities.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2025.1599750/fullgenetic testingbehavioral geneticsethicscriminal justiceMAOA gene
spellingShingle Pietro Refolo
Pietro Refolo
Stefano Ferracuti
Simone Grassi
Costanza Raimondi
Giulia Mercuri
Massimo Zedda
Massimo Zedda
Giovanni Aulino
Giovanni Aulino
Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo
Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo
Antonio Oliva
Antonio Oliva
Ethical issues in the use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system: a systematic review
Frontiers in Genetics
genetic testing
behavioral genetics
ethics
criminal justice
MAOA gene
title Ethical issues in the use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system: a systematic review
title_full Ethical issues in the use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system: a systematic review
title_fullStr Ethical issues in the use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Ethical issues in the use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system: a systematic review
title_short Ethical issues in the use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system: a systematic review
title_sort ethical issues in the use of genetic predictions of aggressive behavior in the criminal justice system a systematic review
topic genetic testing
behavioral genetics
ethics
criminal justice
MAOA gene
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2025.1599750/full
work_keys_str_mv AT pietrorefolo ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT pietrorefolo ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT stefanoferracuti ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT simonegrassi ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT costanzaraimondi ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT giuliamercuri ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT massimozedda ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT massimozedda ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT giovanniaulino ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT giovanniaulino ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT antoniogioacchinospagnolo ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT antoniogioacchinospagnolo ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT antoniooliva ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview
AT antoniooliva ethicalissuesintheuseofgeneticpredictionsofaggressivebehaviorinthecriminaljusticesystemasystematicreview