European Carbon Uptake has Not Benefited From Vegetation Greening

Abstract Substantial evidences indicate a widespread increase in European vegetation greenness since the 1980s due to CO2 fertilization effects (eCO2) and climate warming, but the impact of this process on the regional terrestrial carbon cycle has not been systematically evaluated. Using empirical m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuebang Liu, Bin He, Lanlan Guo, Ling Huang, Wenping Yuan, Xiuzhi Chen, Xingming Hao, Xiaoming Xie, Yafeng Zhang, Ziqian Zhong, Tiewei Li, Aifang Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-10-01
Series:Geophysical Research Letters
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094870
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850211472068575232
author Xuebang Liu
Bin He
Lanlan Guo
Ling Huang
Wenping Yuan
Xiuzhi Chen
Xingming Hao
Xiaoming Xie
Yafeng Zhang
Ziqian Zhong
Tiewei Li
Aifang Chen
author_facet Xuebang Liu
Bin He
Lanlan Guo
Ling Huang
Wenping Yuan
Xiuzhi Chen
Xingming Hao
Xiaoming Xie
Yafeng Zhang
Ziqian Zhong
Tiewei Li
Aifang Chen
author_sort Xuebang Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Substantial evidences indicate a widespread increase in European vegetation greenness since the 1980s due to CO2 fertilization effects (eCO2) and climate warming, but the impact of this process on the regional terrestrial carbon cycle has not been systematically evaluated. Using empirical models based on eddy covariance and process‐based models, we found that the widespread greening did not contribute to an increase in European carbon uptake (decrease in net ecosystem exchange) with a non‐significant trend from 2000 to 2018. The greening‐associated increase in gross primary productivity (GPP) is offset by the simultaneous increase in ecosystem respiration (TER). Moreover, frequent heatwaves cause stronger reductions in GPP than TER, preventing the increase of carbon uptake. These results reveal the double‐edged sword effect of warming on European ecosystems and will help constrain regional models.
format Article
id doaj-art-5f149ca254794ed387068f2bb0d254ea
institution OA Journals
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language English
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geophysical Research Letters
spelling doaj-art-5f149ca254794ed387068f2bb0d254ea2025-08-20T02:09:34ZengWileyGeophysical Research Letters0094-82761944-80072021-10-014820n/an/a10.1029/2021GL094870European Carbon Uptake has Not Benefited From Vegetation GreeningXuebang Liu0Bin He1Lanlan Guo2Ling Huang3Wenping Yuan4Xiuzhi Chen5Xingming Hao6Xiaoming Xie7Yafeng Zhang8Ziqian Zhong9Tiewei Li10Aifang Chen11State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology College of Global Change and Earth System Science Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology College of Global Change and Earth System Science Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology School of Geography Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaCollege of Urban and Environmental Sciences Peking University Beijing ChinaSchool of Atmospheric Sciences Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies Zhuhai Key Laboratory of Dynamics Urban Climate and Ecology Sun Yat‐sen University Zhuhai ChinaSchool of Atmospheric Sciences Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies Zhuhai Key Laboratory of Dynamics Urban Climate and Ecology Sun Yat‐sen University Zhuhai ChinaState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography Chinese Academy of Sciences Urumqi ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology College of Global Change and Earth System Science Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology College of Global Change and Earth System Science Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology College of Global Change and Earth System Science Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology School of Geography Beijing Normal University Beijing ChinaSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering Southern University of Science and Technology Shenzhen ChinaAbstract Substantial evidences indicate a widespread increase in European vegetation greenness since the 1980s due to CO2 fertilization effects (eCO2) and climate warming, but the impact of this process on the regional terrestrial carbon cycle has not been systematically evaluated. Using empirical models based on eddy covariance and process‐based models, we found that the widespread greening did not contribute to an increase in European carbon uptake (decrease in net ecosystem exchange) with a non‐significant trend from 2000 to 2018. The greening‐associated increase in gross primary productivity (GPP) is offset by the simultaneous increase in ecosystem respiration (TER). Moreover, frequent heatwaves cause stronger reductions in GPP than TER, preventing the increase of carbon uptake. These results reveal the double‐edged sword effect of warming on European ecosystems and will help constrain regional models.https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094870
spellingShingle Xuebang Liu
Bin He
Lanlan Guo
Ling Huang
Wenping Yuan
Xiuzhi Chen
Xingming Hao
Xiaoming Xie
Yafeng Zhang
Ziqian Zhong
Tiewei Li
Aifang Chen
European Carbon Uptake has Not Benefited From Vegetation Greening
Geophysical Research Letters
title European Carbon Uptake has Not Benefited From Vegetation Greening
title_full European Carbon Uptake has Not Benefited From Vegetation Greening
title_fullStr European Carbon Uptake has Not Benefited From Vegetation Greening
title_full_unstemmed European Carbon Uptake has Not Benefited From Vegetation Greening
title_short European Carbon Uptake has Not Benefited From Vegetation Greening
title_sort european carbon uptake has not benefited from vegetation greening
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094870
work_keys_str_mv AT xuebangliu europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening
AT binhe europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening
AT lanlanguo europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening
AT linghuang europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening
AT wenpingyuan europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening
AT xiuzhichen europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening
AT xingminghao europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening
AT xiaomingxie europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening
AT yafengzhang europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening
AT ziqianzhong europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening
AT tieweili europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening
AT aifangchen europeancarbonuptakehasnotbenefitedfromvegetationgreening