Did Bank Capital Regulation Exacerbate the Subprime Mortgage Crisis?

This contribution is the second in a series of papers on discrete-time modeling of bank capital regulation and its connection with the subprime mortgage crisis (SMC). The latter was caused by, amongst other things, the downturn in the U.S. housing market, risky lending and borrowing practices, inacc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. A. Petersen, M. C. Senosi, J. Mukuddem-Petersen, M. P. Mulaudzi, I. M. Schoeman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2009-01-01
Series:Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/742968
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832555422572085248
author M. A. Petersen
M. C. Senosi
J. Mukuddem-Petersen
M. P. Mulaudzi
I. M. Schoeman
author_facet M. A. Petersen
M. C. Senosi
J. Mukuddem-Petersen
M. P. Mulaudzi
I. M. Schoeman
author_sort M. A. Petersen
collection DOAJ
description This contribution is the second in a series of papers on discrete-time modeling of bank capital regulation and its connection with the subprime mortgage crisis (SMC). The latter was caused by, amongst other things, the downturn in the U.S. housing market, risky lending and borrowing practices, inaccurate credit ratings, credit default swap contracts as well as excessive individual and corporate debt levels. The Basel II Capital Accord's primary tenet is that banks should be given more freedom to decide how much risk exposure to permit; a practice brought into question by the SMC. For instance, institutions worldwide have badly misjudged the risk related to investments ranging from subprime mortgage loans to mortgage-backed securities (MBSs). Also, analysts are now questioning whether Basel II has failed by allowing these institutions to provision less capital for subprime mortgage loan losses from highly rated debt, including MBSs. Other unintended consequences of Basel II include the procyclicality of credit ratings and changes in bank lending behavior. Our main objective is to model the dependence of bank credit and capital on the level of macroeconomic activity under Basel I and Basel II as well as its connection with banking behavior for the period before and during the SMC.
format Article
id doaj-art-5ec2d9e11d48407b86304bcad156f61e
institution Kabale University
issn 1026-0226
1607-887X
language English
publishDate 2009-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
spelling doaj-art-5ec2d9e11d48407b86304bcad156f61e2025-02-03T05:48:19ZengWileyDiscrete Dynamics in Nature and Society1026-02261607-887X2009-01-01200910.1155/2009/742968742968Did Bank Capital Regulation Exacerbate the Subprime Mortgage Crisis?M. A. Petersen0M. C. Senosi1J. Mukuddem-Petersen2M. P. Mulaudzi3I. M. Schoeman4Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South AfricaDepartment of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South AfricaDepartment of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South AfricaDepartment of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South AfricaDepartment of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South AfricaThis contribution is the second in a series of papers on discrete-time modeling of bank capital regulation and its connection with the subprime mortgage crisis (SMC). The latter was caused by, amongst other things, the downturn in the U.S. housing market, risky lending and borrowing practices, inaccurate credit ratings, credit default swap contracts as well as excessive individual and corporate debt levels. The Basel II Capital Accord's primary tenet is that banks should be given more freedom to decide how much risk exposure to permit; a practice brought into question by the SMC. For instance, institutions worldwide have badly misjudged the risk related to investments ranging from subprime mortgage loans to mortgage-backed securities (MBSs). Also, analysts are now questioning whether Basel II has failed by allowing these institutions to provision less capital for subprime mortgage loan losses from highly rated debt, including MBSs. Other unintended consequences of Basel II include the procyclicality of credit ratings and changes in bank lending behavior. Our main objective is to model the dependence of bank credit and capital on the level of macroeconomic activity under Basel I and Basel II as well as its connection with banking behavior for the period before and during the SMC.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/742968
spellingShingle M. A. Petersen
M. C. Senosi
J. Mukuddem-Petersen
M. P. Mulaudzi
I. M. Schoeman
Did Bank Capital Regulation Exacerbate the Subprime Mortgage Crisis?
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
title Did Bank Capital Regulation Exacerbate the Subprime Mortgage Crisis?
title_full Did Bank Capital Regulation Exacerbate the Subprime Mortgage Crisis?
title_fullStr Did Bank Capital Regulation Exacerbate the Subprime Mortgage Crisis?
title_full_unstemmed Did Bank Capital Regulation Exacerbate the Subprime Mortgage Crisis?
title_short Did Bank Capital Regulation Exacerbate the Subprime Mortgage Crisis?
title_sort did bank capital regulation exacerbate the subprime mortgage crisis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/742968
work_keys_str_mv AT mapetersen didbankcapitalregulationexacerbatethesubprimemortgagecrisis
AT mcsenosi didbankcapitalregulationexacerbatethesubprimemortgagecrisis
AT jmukuddempetersen didbankcapitalregulationexacerbatethesubprimemortgagecrisis
AT mpmulaudzi didbankcapitalregulationexacerbatethesubprimemortgagecrisis
AT imschoeman didbankcapitalregulationexacerbatethesubprimemortgagecrisis