Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations

This study was designed to evaluate microleakage that appeared on Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) restorations. Sixty class V cavities (h×w×l=2mm×2mm×3mm) were cut on thirty extracted third molars, which were randomly allocated to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabine O. Geerts, Laurence Seidel, Adelin I. Albert, Audrey M. Gueders
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/728453
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841524624162029568
author Sabine O. Geerts
Laurence Seidel
Adelin I. Albert
Audrey M. Gueders
author_facet Sabine O. Geerts
Laurence Seidel
Adelin I. Albert
Audrey M. Gueders
author_sort Sabine O. Geerts
collection DOAJ
description This study was designed to evaluate microleakage that appeared on Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) restorations. Sixty class V cavities (h×w×l=2mm×2mm×3mm) were cut on thirty extracted third molars, which were randomly allocated to three experimental groups. All the buccal cavities were pretreated with polyacrylic acid, whereas the lingual cavities were treated with three one-step Self-Etch adhesives, respectively, Xeno III (Dentsply Detrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany), iBond exp (Heraeus Kulzer gmbH & Co. KG, Hanau, Germany), and Adper Prompt-L-Pop (3M ESPE AG, Dental products Seefeld, Germany). All cavities were completely filled with RMGIC, teeth were thermocycled for 800 cycles, and leakage was evaluated. Results were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SDs). Microleakage scores were analysed by means of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) assuming an ordinal logistic link function. All results were considered to be significant at the 5% critical level (𝑃<.05). The results showed that bonding RMGIC to dentin with a Self-Etch adhesive rather than using polyacrylic acid did not influence microleakage scores (𝑃=.091), except for one tested Self-Etch adhesive, namely, Xeno III (𝑃<.0001). Nevertheless, our results did not show any significant difference between the three tested Self-Etch adhesive systems. In conclusion, the pretreatment of dentin with Self-Etch adhesive system, before RMGIC filling, seems to be an alternative to the conventional Dentin Conditioner for the clinicians as suggested by our results (thermocycling) and others (microtensile tests).
format Article
id doaj-art-5ebed736243246fc9a1a5dfe4ea6cc4f
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-5ebed736243246fc9a1a5dfe4ea6cc4f2025-02-03T05:47:42ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362010-01-01201010.1155/2010/728453728453Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement RestorationsSabine O. Geerts0Laurence Seidel1Adelin I. Albert2Audrey M. Gueders3Division of Conservative and Adhesive Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, University of Liège, Box 45, 4020 Liège, BelgiumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liège, Box 45, 4020 Liège, BelgiumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liège, Box 45, 4020 Liège, BelgiumDivision of Conservative and Adhesive Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, University of Liège, Box 45, 4020 Liège, BelgiumThis study was designed to evaluate microleakage that appeared on Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) restorations. Sixty class V cavities (h×w×l=2mm×2mm×3mm) were cut on thirty extracted third molars, which were randomly allocated to three experimental groups. All the buccal cavities were pretreated with polyacrylic acid, whereas the lingual cavities were treated with three one-step Self-Etch adhesives, respectively, Xeno III (Dentsply Detrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany), iBond exp (Heraeus Kulzer gmbH & Co. KG, Hanau, Germany), and Adper Prompt-L-Pop (3M ESPE AG, Dental products Seefeld, Germany). All cavities were completely filled with RMGIC, teeth were thermocycled for 800 cycles, and leakage was evaluated. Results were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SDs). Microleakage scores were analysed by means of generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) assuming an ordinal logistic link function. All results were considered to be significant at the 5% critical level (𝑃<.05). The results showed that bonding RMGIC to dentin with a Self-Etch adhesive rather than using polyacrylic acid did not influence microleakage scores (𝑃=.091), except for one tested Self-Etch adhesive, namely, Xeno III (𝑃<.0001). Nevertheless, our results did not show any significant difference between the three tested Self-Etch adhesive systems. In conclusion, the pretreatment of dentin with Self-Etch adhesive system, before RMGIC filling, seems to be an alternative to the conventional Dentin Conditioner for the clinicians as suggested by our results (thermocycling) and others (microtensile tests).http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/728453
spellingShingle Sabine O. Geerts
Laurence Seidel
Adelin I. Albert
Audrey M. Gueders
Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations
International Journal of Dentistry
title Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations
title_full Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations
title_fullStr Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations
title_full_unstemmed Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations
title_short Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations
title_sort microleakage after thermocycling of three self etch adhesives under resin modified glass ionomer cement restorations
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/728453
work_keys_str_mv AT sabineogeerts microleakageafterthermocyclingofthreeselfetchadhesivesunderresinmodifiedglassionomercementrestorations
AT laurenceseidel microleakageafterthermocyclingofthreeselfetchadhesivesunderresinmodifiedglassionomercementrestorations
AT adelinialbert microleakageafterthermocyclingofthreeselfetchadhesivesunderresinmodifiedglassionomercementrestorations
AT audreymgueders microleakageafterthermocyclingofthreeselfetchadhesivesunderresinmodifiedglassionomercementrestorations