Aspectual Variation in Negated Past Tense Contexts Across Slavic

This study examines variation in the use and interpretation of the perfective (<i>pfv</i>) aspect in negated past tense contexts across East Slavic and selected West and Southwest Slavic languages. Unlike West and Southwest Slavic, where the <i>pfv</i> + neg in past tense con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dorota Klimek-Jankowska, Alberto Frasson, Piotr Gulgowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
Series:Languages
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/10/4/78
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850180807771029504
author Dorota Klimek-Jankowska
Alberto Frasson
Piotr Gulgowski
author_facet Dorota Klimek-Jankowska
Alberto Frasson
Piotr Gulgowski
author_sort Dorota Klimek-Jankowska
collection DOAJ
description This study examines variation in the use and interpretation of the perfective (<i>pfv</i>) aspect in negated past tense contexts across East Slavic and selected West and Southwest Slavic languages. Unlike West and Southwest Slavic, where the <i>pfv</i> + neg in past tense contexts allows for an interpretation denying the existence of the event at any past time, East Slavic uniquely interprets the <i>pfv</i> aspect in these contexts as indicating that the agent either planned but failed to realize the event or initiated it but failed to complete it. We account for this by assuming that negation operates either high (¬TP), as sentential negation, or low (¬vP), over the event domain. In East Slavic, the interaction of the <i>pfv</i> aspect with the past tense prevents high negation and enforces low negation, resulting in inhibited event reading. This reading implies that the event was expected or initiated but ultimately unrealized. We argue that the semantics of the <i>pfv</i> aspect in East Slavic parallels the semantics of specific indefinites in the nominal domain. The aspect head introduces a temporal variable <i>t</i>, which, via a choice function, restricts the domain of existential quantification over <i>t</i> to a singleton set, presupposing the existence of <i>t,</i> which cannot be canceled by high negation. Consequently, in negated <i>pfv</i> past tense contexts in East Slavic, negation scopes over the event domain giving rise to special interpretative constraints in past tense perfective contexts with negation.
format Article
id doaj-art-5eba0f7e3c1c4348bd38e319e4b58eb7
institution OA Journals
issn 2226-471X
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Languages
spelling doaj-art-5eba0f7e3c1c4348bd38e319e4b58eb72025-08-20T02:18:03ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2025-04-011047810.3390/languages10040078Aspectual Variation in Negated Past Tense Contexts Across SlavicDorota Klimek-Jankowska0Alberto Frasson1Piotr Gulgowski2Center for Corpus and Experimental Research on Slavic Languages ‘Slavicus’, University of Wrocław, 50-137 Wrocław, PolandCenter for Corpus and Experimental Research on Slavic Languages ‘Slavicus’, University of Wrocław, 50-137 Wrocław, PolandInstitute of English Philology, University of Wrocław, 50-137 Wrocław, PolandThis study examines variation in the use and interpretation of the perfective (<i>pfv</i>) aspect in negated past tense contexts across East Slavic and selected West and Southwest Slavic languages. Unlike West and Southwest Slavic, where the <i>pfv</i> + neg in past tense contexts allows for an interpretation denying the existence of the event at any past time, East Slavic uniquely interprets the <i>pfv</i> aspect in these contexts as indicating that the agent either planned but failed to realize the event or initiated it but failed to complete it. We account for this by assuming that negation operates either high (¬TP), as sentential negation, or low (¬vP), over the event domain. In East Slavic, the interaction of the <i>pfv</i> aspect with the past tense prevents high negation and enforces low negation, resulting in inhibited event reading. This reading implies that the event was expected or initiated but ultimately unrealized. We argue that the semantics of the <i>pfv</i> aspect in East Slavic parallels the semantics of specific indefinites in the nominal domain. The aspect head introduces a temporal variable <i>t</i>, which, via a choice function, restricts the domain of existential quantification over <i>t</i> to a singleton set, presupposing the existence of <i>t,</i> which cannot be canceled by high negation. Consequently, in negated <i>pfv</i> past tense contexts in East Slavic, negation scopes over the event domain giving rise to special interpretative constraints in past tense perfective contexts with negation.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/10/4/78negationperfective aspectpast tenseEast SlavicWest SlavicSouthwest Slavic
spellingShingle Dorota Klimek-Jankowska
Alberto Frasson
Piotr Gulgowski
Aspectual Variation in Negated Past Tense Contexts Across Slavic
Languages
negation
perfective aspect
past tense
East Slavic
West Slavic
Southwest Slavic
title Aspectual Variation in Negated Past Tense Contexts Across Slavic
title_full Aspectual Variation in Negated Past Tense Contexts Across Slavic
title_fullStr Aspectual Variation in Negated Past Tense Contexts Across Slavic
title_full_unstemmed Aspectual Variation in Negated Past Tense Contexts Across Slavic
title_short Aspectual Variation in Negated Past Tense Contexts Across Slavic
title_sort aspectual variation in negated past tense contexts across slavic
topic negation
perfective aspect
past tense
East Slavic
West Slavic
Southwest Slavic
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/10/4/78
work_keys_str_mv AT dorotaklimekjankowska aspectualvariationinnegatedpasttensecontextsacrossslavic
AT albertofrasson aspectualvariationinnegatedpasttensecontextsacrossslavic
AT piotrgulgowski aspectualvariationinnegatedpasttensecontextsacrossslavic