Exploring the landscape of student representation in medical curriculum development across U.S. MD schools: A comparative analysis

Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the various models of student representation in curriculum development across medical schools in the United States, based on the participatory governance theory. Recognizing the critical role of student feedback in enhancing medical education, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ish Sethi, C. Jessica Dine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07114-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849731791285387264
author Ish Sethi
C. Jessica Dine
author_facet Ish Sethi
C. Jessica Dine
author_sort Ish Sethi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the various models of student representation in curriculum development across medical schools in the United States, based on the participatory governance theory. Recognizing the critical role of student feedback in enhancing medical education, the work sought to assess the diversity of student representation models, identify key elements that contribute to effective student involvement, and evaluate the potential impact on curriculum outcomes. Methods An initial list of 166 allopathic MD schools was curated from the AAMC Medical Schools Admission Requirements website. Schools were selected based on the presence of information about student representation in curriculum design. This selection was refined through a Google search using specific search terms related to student representation, followed by an evaluation based on the amount and relevance of available information on each school’s website. The methodology involved a detailed examination of the websites for selected schools, focusing on the structure and organization of student involvement in curriculum development. Results Of the initial 166 medical schools, 49 (29.7%) had publicly available information on student involvement in curriculum development. These schools were categorized into three main models of student representation: direct representation, feedback-driven, and hybrid models. The analysis revealed significant diversity in how student representation is implemented, with each model exhibiting unique strengths and limitations. Direct representation models were found to facilitate substantive student roles in decision-making, feedback-driven models excelled in rapidly integrating student feedback into curricular adjustments, and hybrid models combined aspects of both to provide a comprehensive approach to student involvement. Conclusions There is no one-size-fits-all model for student representation in medical education. However, the hybrid model shows promise for its balanced approach to integrating student perspectives into curriculum development. Continuous evaluation and refinement of student representation models are essential for ensuring that medical education remains responsive to the needs of students and the evolving landscape of the medical field. This work underscores the importance of student feedback in medical education and advocates for further studies to quantify the impact of different models of student representation on educational outcomes and professional success.
format Article
id doaj-art-5ea05c103f9a4dd8aab74a3efa28553c
institution DOAJ
issn 1472-6920
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Education
spelling doaj-art-5ea05c103f9a4dd8aab74a3efa28553c2025-08-20T03:08:25ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202025-05-012511810.1186/s12909-025-07114-wExploring the landscape of student representation in medical curriculum development across U.S. MD schools: A comparative analysisIsh Sethi0C. Jessica Dine1Perelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaAbstract Background This study aimed to investigate the various models of student representation in curriculum development across medical schools in the United States, based on the participatory governance theory. Recognizing the critical role of student feedback in enhancing medical education, the work sought to assess the diversity of student representation models, identify key elements that contribute to effective student involvement, and evaluate the potential impact on curriculum outcomes. Methods An initial list of 166 allopathic MD schools was curated from the AAMC Medical Schools Admission Requirements website. Schools were selected based on the presence of information about student representation in curriculum design. This selection was refined through a Google search using specific search terms related to student representation, followed by an evaluation based on the amount and relevance of available information on each school’s website. The methodology involved a detailed examination of the websites for selected schools, focusing on the structure and organization of student involvement in curriculum development. Results Of the initial 166 medical schools, 49 (29.7%) had publicly available information on student involvement in curriculum development. These schools were categorized into three main models of student representation: direct representation, feedback-driven, and hybrid models. The analysis revealed significant diversity in how student representation is implemented, with each model exhibiting unique strengths and limitations. Direct representation models were found to facilitate substantive student roles in decision-making, feedback-driven models excelled in rapidly integrating student feedback into curricular adjustments, and hybrid models combined aspects of both to provide a comprehensive approach to student involvement. Conclusions There is no one-size-fits-all model for student representation in medical education. However, the hybrid model shows promise for its balanced approach to integrating student perspectives into curriculum development. Continuous evaluation and refinement of student representation models are essential for ensuring that medical education remains responsive to the needs of students and the evolving landscape of the medical field. This work underscores the importance of student feedback in medical education and advocates for further studies to quantify the impact of different models of student representation on educational outcomes and professional success.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07114-wMedical curriculum developmentMedical student feedbackStudent representation
spellingShingle Ish Sethi
C. Jessica Dine
Exploring the landscape of student representation in medical curriculum development across U.S. MD schools: A comparative analysis
BMC Medical Education
Medical curriculum development
Medical student feedback
Student representation
title Exploring the landscape of student representation in medical curriculum development across U.S. MD schools: A comparative analysis
title_full Exploring the landscape of student representation in medical curriculum development across U.S. MD schools: A comparative analysis
title_fullStr Exploring the landscape of student representation in medical curriculum development across U.S. MD schools: A comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the landscape of student representation in medical curriculum development across U.S. MD schools: A comparative analysis
title_short Exploring the landscape of student representation in medical curriculum development across U.S. MD schools: A comparative analysis
title_sort exploring the landscape of student representation in medical curriculum development across u s md schools a comparative analysis
topic Medical curriculum development
Medical student feedback
Student representation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07114-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ishsethi exploringthelandscapeofstudentrepresentationinmedicalcurriculumdevelopmentacrossusmdschoolsacomparativeanalysis
AT cjessicadine exploringthelandscapeofstudentrepresentationinmedicalcurriculumdevelopmentacrossusmdschoolsacomparativeanalysis