Resistance Trainings for Enhancement in Jumping Performance: A Comparative Analysis

The primary purpose of programming is to organize training factor modifications that will provide the greatest possible improvement in performance. However, the best programming approach that results in enhanced neuromuscular adaptations is still unclear. This research set out to determine how thre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sana Ullah Khan, Muhammad Farhan Tabassum, Rabia Karim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, The University of Lahore. 2023-12-01
Series:The Sky
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uol.edu.pk/the-sky/article/view/2687
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849250764362350592
author Sana Ullah Khan
Muhammad Farhan Tabassum
Rabia Karim
author_facet Sana Ullah Khan
Muhammad Farhan Tabassum
Rabia Karim
author_sort Sana Ullah Khan
collection DOAJ
description The primary purpose of programming is to organize training factor modifications that will provide the greatest possible improvement in performance. However, the best programming approach that results in enhanced neuromuscular adaptations is still unclear. This research set out to determine how three varying degrees of unpredictability within resistance training programs affected performance gains. Thirty-six people were split into three groups of twelve each: those who would receive training based on a weekly model (WM), those who would receive instruction based on a daily model (DM), and those who would receive training based on a session model (SM); Six weeks of back squat sessions comprised the training intervention. All participants received the same total training load during the course of six-week intervention. We tested the individual's maximum dynamic strength (1RM) in the back-squat, countermovement jump (CMJ), and squat jump (SJ) both before and after the training intervention. Significant gains were observed across the board (p<0.05). The effect size (ES) of the session model in 1RM is just 0.29.  Effect sizes for the daily model and session model in SJ are both moderate, at 0.61 and 0.41 respectively. The impact size in the CMJ daily model is quite moderate (0.51), while it is very large (0.99) in the session model.  The results of this study show that changing the type of stimulus used in resistance training more often is a significant way to improve both strength and jumping ability at the same time.
format Article
id doaj-art-5e8972061a7c4c9cb63f47dec31fb1f6
institution Kabale University
issn 2523-9368
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, The University of Lahore.
record_format Article
series The Sky
spelling doaj-art-5e8972061a7c4c9cb63f47dec31fb1f62025-08-20T03:57:09ZengDepartment of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, The University of Lahore.The Sky2523-93682023-12-01710.51846/the-sky.v7i0.2687Resistance Trainings for Enhancement in Jumping Performance: A Comparative AnalysisSana Ullah Khan0Muhammad Farhan Tabassum1Rabia Karim2Sanai Fitness4u, 19 Cheetham Hill Road, Manchester M4 4FY, United KingdomUniversity of Management and Technology, LahoreUniversity of Home Economics, Lahore, Pakistan The primary purpose of programming is to organize training factor modifications that will provide the greatest possible improvement in performance. However, the best programming approach that results in enhanced neuromuscular adaptations is still unclear. This research set out to determine how three varying degrees of unpredictability within resistance training programs affected performance gains. Thirty-six people were split into three groups of twelve each: those who would receive training based on a weekly model (WM), those who would receive instruction based on a daily model (DM), and those who would receive training based on a session model (SM); Six weeks of back squat sessions comprised the training intervention. All participants received the same total training load during the course of six-week intervention. We tested the individual's maximum dynamic strength (1RM) in the back-squat, countermovement jump (CMJ), and squat jump (SJ) both before and after the training intervention. Significant gains were observed across the board (p<0.05). The effect size (ES) of the session model in 1RM is just 0.29.  Effect sizes for the daily model and session model in SJ are both moderate, at 0.61 and 0.41 respectively. The impact size in the CMJ daily model is quite moderate (0.51), while it is very large (0.99) in the session model.  The results of this study show that changing the type of stimulus used in resistance training more often is a significant way to improve both strength and jumping ability at the same time. https://journals.uol.edu.pk/the-sky/article/view/2687Resistance TrainingProgrammingStrengthVariability
spellingShingle Sana Ullah Khan
Muhammad Farhan Tabassum
Rabia Karim
Resistance Trainings for Enhancement in Jumping Performance: A Comparative Analysis
The Sky
Resistance Training
Programming
Strength
Variability
title Resistance Trainings for Enhancement in Jumping Performance: A Comparative Analysis
title_full Resistance Trainings for Enhancement in Jumping Performance: A Comparative Analysis
title_fullStr Resistance Trainings for Enhancement in Jumping Performance: A Comparative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Resistance Trainings for Enhancement in Jumping Performance: A Comparative Analysis
title_short Resistance Trainings for Enhancement in Jumping Performance: A Comparative Analysis
title_sort resistance trainings for enhancement in jumping performance a comparative analysis
topic Resistance Training
Programming
Strength
Variability
url https://journals.uol.edu.pk/the-sky/article/view/2687
work_keys_str_mv AT sanaullahkhan resistancetrainingsforenhancementinjumpingperformanceacomparativeanalysis
AT muhammadfarhantabassum resistancetrainingsforenhancementinjumpingperformanceacomparativeanalysis
AT rabiakarim resistancetrainingsforenhancementinjumpingperformanceacomparativeanalysis