Estimation of Water Saturation in Shale Formation Using In Situ Multifrequency Dielectric Permittivity

Estimating water saturation via conventional logging tool such as resistivity cannot provide an accurate solution in a formation with low conductivity water and tight porosity. As an alternative, we employed a dielectric permittivity, which makes it easy to differentiate the water from the other flu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yongchae Cho, Sean S. Dolan, Nishank Saxena, Vishal Das
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Geofluids
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9491979
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832564057058574336
author Yongchae Cho
Sean S. Dolan
Nishank Saxena
Vishal Das
author_facet Yongchae Cho
Sean S. Dolan
Nishank Saxena
Vishal Das
author_sort Yongchae Cho
collection DOAJ
description Estimating water saturation via conventional logging tool such as resistivity cannot provide an accurate solution in a formation with low conductivity water and tight porosity. As an alternative, we employed a dielectric permittivity, which makes it easy to differentiate the water from the other fluids in pore structures. A multichannel frequency dielectric logging tool is used for measuring in situ permittivity. To simulate a dielectric permittivity, we used two analytic models: Lichtenecker-Rother (LR) and Stroud-Milton-De (SMD) models. The key goal of this research is to propose a workflow to evaluate an equivalent Archie’s parameter which can generate the same dielectric logging tool responses with core measurement results using a given analytic models. According to the results of the LR model curve-fitting, the estimated Archie’s parameter shows inversely proportional relationship with clay volumes. The estimated Archie’s parameter from the SMD model is sensitive to the lower frequency channels of the multifrequency dielectric logging tool. Nevertheless, utilizing the response of the dielectric logging tool in the frequency range, where interfacial polarization effect does not exist, can provide an alternative to estimate water saturation in shale formations with relatively less conductive waters.
format Article
id doaj-art-5e87ccd2884f4c05991395a25a6e6b5b
institution Kabale University
issn 1468-8123
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geofluids
spelling doaj-art-5e87ccd2884f4c05991395a25a6e6b5b2025-02-03T01:11:57ZengWileyGeofluids1468-81232022-01-01202210.1155/2022/9491979Estimation of Water Saturation in Shale Formation Using In Situ Multifrequency Dielectric PermittivityYongchae Cho0Sean S. Dolan1Nishank Saxena2Vishal Das3Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.Amazon Web Services Inc.Estimating water saturation via conventional logging tool such as resistivity cannot provide an accurate solution in a formation with low conductivity water and tight porosity. As an alternative, we employed a dielectric permittivity, which makes it easy to differentiate the water from the other fluids in pore structures. A multichannel frequency dielectric logging tool is used for measuring in situ permittivity. To simulate a dielectric permittivity, we used two analytic models: Lichtenecker-Rother (LR) and Stroud-Milton-De (SMD) models. The key goal of this research is to propose a workflow to evaluate an equivalent Archie’s parameter which can generate the same dielectric logging tool responses with core measurement results using a given analytic models. According to the results of the LR model curve-fitting, the estimated Archie’s parameter shows inversely proportional relationship with clay volumes. The estimated Archie’s parameter from the SMD model is sensitive to the lower frequency channels of the multifrequency dielectric logging tool. Nevertheless, utilizing the response of the dielectric logging tool in the frequency range, where interfacial polarization effect does not exist, can provide an alternative to estimate water saturation in shale formations with relatively less conductive waters.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9491979
spellingShingle Yongchae Cho
Sean S. Dolan
Nishank Saxena
Vishal Das
Estimation of Water Saturation in Shale Formation Using In Situ Multifrequency Dielectric Permittivity
Geofluids
title Estimation of Water Saturation in Shale Formation Using In Situ Multifrequency Dielectric Permittivity
title_full Estimation of Water Saturation in Shale Formation Using In Situ Multifrequency Dielectric Permittivity
title_fullStr Estimation of Water Saturation in Shale Formation Using In Situ Multifrequency Dielectric Permittivity
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Water Saturation in Shale Formation Using In Situ Multifrequency Dielectric Permittivity
title_short Estimation of Water Saturation in Shale Formation Using In Situ Multifrequency Dielectric Permittivity
title_sort estimation of water saturation in shale formation using in situ multifrequency dielectric permittivity
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9491979
work_keys_str_mv AT yongchaecho estimationofwatersaturationinshaleformationusinginsitumultifrequencydielectricpermittivity
AT seansdolan estimationofwatersaturationinshaleformationusinginsitumultifrequencydielectricpermittivity
AT nishanksaxena estimationofwatersaturationinshaleformationusinginsitumultifrequencydielectricpermittivity
AT vishaldas estimationofwatersaturationinshaleformationusinginsitumultifrequencydielectricpermittivity