Ensuring robustness in scientific research, split-root assays as an example case
Scientific progress relies on reproducibility, replicability, and robustness of research outcomes. After briefly discussing these terms and their significance for reliable scientific discovery, we argue for the importance of investigating robustness of outcomes to experimental protocol variations. W...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Lucila Salvatore, Ronald Pierik, Kaisa Kajala, Kirsten ten Tusscher |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Quantitative Plant Biology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2632882825100040/type/journal_article |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
M<sub>split</sub> Estimation with Local or Global Robustness Against Outliers—Applications and Limitations in LiDAR Data Processing
by: Patrycja Wyszkowska, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Extraordinarily corrupt or statistically commonplace? Reproducibility crises may stem from a lack of understanding of outcome probabilities
by: Caetano Souto-Maior
Published: (2025-04-01) -
A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics
by: Rachel Heyard, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Reproducibility in Subsurface Geoscience
by: Michael J. Steventon, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology
by: Elliot Gould, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)