Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Vaginally Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Primary Hospitals: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background This study aimed to compare the operative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). We also aimed to determine the feasibility of performing vNOTES hysterectomy in primary hospitals.Methods This prospective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuying Fang, Yuandan Xia, Jianbo Jin, Jiaren Zhang, Lei Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Journal of Investigative Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/08941939.2025.2515054
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849330524475097088
author Shuying Fang
Yuandan Xia
Jianbo Jin
Jiaren Zhang
Lei Lu
author_facet Shuying Fang
Yuandan Xia
Jianbo Jin
Jiaren Zhang
Lei Lu
author_sort Shuying Fang
collection DOAJ
description Background This study aimed to compare the operative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). We also aimed to determine the feasibility of performing vNOTES hysterectomy in primary hospitals.Methods This prospective cohort study enrolled 54 patients with indications for hysterectomy related to benign uterine disease without prolapse, between September 1, 2020, and November 30, 2024. The patients were categorized into two groups: vNOTES hysterectomy and TLH (n = 27 each). Surgical outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, recovery parameters, and complications, were assessed.Results Preoperative baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The vNOTES group had a longer mean operative time (187.6 vs. 154.4 min, p < 0.05) and greater median blood loss (100 vs. 30 mL, p < 0.05) compared to the TLH group. However, there were no significant differences in conversion rates, uterine weights, complications, 24-h pain scores, hospital stay, costs, or readmission rates. The vNOTES group demonstrated shorter times to postoperative ambulation, earlier return of bowel function (anal exhaust), and reduced urinary catheter insertion duration (p < 0.05).Conclusion vNOTES hysterectomy is feasible in primary hospitals, with surgical outcomes comparable to those of TLH. Patients who underwent vNOTES experienced faster recovery, indicating that it serves as a potential minimally invasive alternative to TLH. However, the small sample size warrants further studies to validate these findings.
format Article
id doaj-art-5dee032d21794874a7b79c5f8c4689c1
institution Kabale University
issn 0894-1939
1521-0553
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Investigative Surgery
spelling doaj-art-5dee032d21794874a7b79c5f8c4689c12025-08-20T03:46:53ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Investigative Surgery0894-19391521-05532025-12-0138110.1080/08941939.2025.2515054Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Vaginally Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Primary Hospitals: A Prospective Cohort StudyShuying Fang0Yuandan Xia1Jianbo Jin2Jiaren Zhang3Lei Lu4Department of Gynecology, Hangzhou Fuyang Women and Children Hospital, Hangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gynecology, Hangzhou Fuyang Women and Children Hospital, Hangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gynecology, Hangzhou Fuyang Women and Children Hospital, Hangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gynecology, Hangzhou Fuyang Women and Children Hospital, Hangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gynecology, Hangzhou Fuyang Women and Children Hospital, Hangzhou, ChinaBackground This study aimed to compare the operative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). We also aimed to determine the feasibility of performing vNOTES hysterectomy in primary hospitals.Methods This prospective cohort study enrolled 54 patients with indications for hysterectomy related to benign uterine disease without prolapse, between September 1, 2020, and November 30, 2024. The patients were categorized into two groups: vNOTES hysterectomy and TLH (n = 27 each). Surgical outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, recovery parameters, and complications, were assessed.Results Preoperative baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The vNOTES group had a longer mean operative time (187.6 vs. 154.4 min, p < 0.05) and greater median blood loss (100 vs. 30 mL, p < 0.05) compared to the TLH group. However, there were no significant differences in conversion rates, uterine weights, complications, 24-h pain scores, hospital stay, costs, or readmission rates. The vNOTES group demonstrated shorter times to postoperative ambulation, earlier return of bowel function (anal exhaust), and reduced urinary catheter insertion duration (p < 0.05).Conclusion vNOTES hysterectomy is feasible in primary hospitals, with surgical outcomes comparable to those of TLH. Patients who underwent vNOTES experienced faster recovery, indicating that it serves as a potential minimally invasive alternative to TLH. However, the small sample size warrants further studies to validate these findings.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/08941939.2025.2515054hysterectomynatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)laparoscopyvaginal surgeryminimally invasive surgery
spellingShingle Shuying Fang
Yuandan Xia
Jianbo Jin
Jiaren Zhang
Lei Lu
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Vaginally Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Primary Hospitals: A Prospective Cohort Study
Journal of Investigative Surgery
hysterectomy
natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)
laparoscopy
vaginal surgery
minimally invasive surgery
title Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Vaginally Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Primary Hospitals: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Vaginally Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Primary Hospitals: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Vaginally Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Primary Hospitals: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Vaginally Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Primary Hospitals: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_short Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Vaginally Assisted NOTES Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Primary Hospitals: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_sort comparison of surgical outcomes between vaginally assisted notes hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy in primary hospitals a prospective cohort study
topic hysterectomy
natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)
laparoscopy
vaginal surgery
minimally invasive surgery
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/08941939.2025.2515054
work_keys_str_mv AT shuyingfang comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweenvaginallyassistednoteshysterectomyandlaparoscopichysterectomyinprimaryhospitalsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT yuandanxia comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweenvaginallyassistednoteshysterectomyandlaparoscopichysterectomyinprimaryhospitalsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT jianbojin comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweenvaginallyassistednoteshysterectomyandlaparoscopichysterectomyinprimaryhospitalsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT jiarenzhang comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweenvaginallyassistednoteshysterectomyandlaparoscopichysterectomyinprimaryhospitalsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT leilu comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweenvaginallyassistednoteshysterectomyandlaparoscopichysterectomyinprimaryhospitalsaprospectivecohortstudy