Patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment in clinical trials: a systematic review of guidance for trial protocol writers.
<h4>Background</h4>Evidence suggests there are inconsistencies in patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment and reporting in clinical trials, which may limit the use of these data to inform patient care. For trials with a PRO endpoint, routine inclusion of key PRO information in the prot...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Melanie Calvert, Derek Kyte, Helen Duffy, Adrian Gheorghe, Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber, Jonathan Ives, Heather Draper, Michael Brundage, Jane Blazeby, Madeleine King |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110216 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Systematic evaluation of the patient-reported outcome (PRO) content of clinical trial protocols.
by: Derek Kyte, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Patient reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials: is 'in-trial' guidance lacking? a systematic review.
by: Derek G Kyte, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Informing potential participants about research: observational study with an embedded randomized controlled trial.
by: Helen M Kirkby, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Centre selection for clinical trials and the generalisability of results: a mixed methods study.
by: Adrian Gheorghe, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
'Trial Exegesis': Methods for Synthesizing Clinical and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Data in Trials to Inform Clinical Practice. A Systematic Review.
by: Angus G K McNair, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)