UK Built Environment postgraduate programme provision: sectoral context, viability and educational implications

Postgraduate (PG) Built Environment education provides higher level skills, yet, concerns of losing such provision exist, as UK universities are experiencing financial challenges from systemic governmental underfunding. This article presents survey findings evaluating three areas in PG Built Environ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alan M. Forster, Laurent Galbrun, Nick Pilcher, Stuart Tennant, Nigel Craig, Mike Murray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Cogent Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2504245
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850158240044679168
author Alan M. Forster
Laurent Galbrun
Nick Pilcher
Stuart Tennant
Nigel Craig
Mike Murray
author_facet Alan M. Forster
Laurent Galbrun
Nick Pilcher
Stuart Tennant
Nigel Craig
Mike Murray
author_sort Alan M. Forster
collection DOAJ
description Postgraduate (PG) Built Environment education provides higher level skills, yet, concerns of losing such provision exist, as UK universities are experiencing financial challenges from systemic governmental underfunding. This article presents survey findings evaluating three areas in PG Built Environment provision: (i) Institutional context and programmes offerings; (ii) Programme viability and institutional decision making; and (iii) Implications of change in programme offerings. Collectively, these support an understanding of ‘What is offered?’ ‘What is viable?’ and ‘What is the result of change in provision?’ Participants included Senior academics from a range of UK universities and disciplines. Results suggest more PG programmes are being opened (72%) than closed (35%), reflecting institutional aspirations to grow numbers via new offerings. No consensus exists regarding numbers for financial viability, although 10 to 30 students was commonly noted. Decisions to open and close programmes are largely ‘top-down’, from University Executive or Head of School, whilst arguments for retaining programmes with low student numbers typically come from staff at programme level. Regarding implications of change, policy makers are encouraged to engage with universities, employers and professional bodies, as findings point towards more online PG degrees, Continuing Professional Development activities and inhouse specialist training.
format Article
id doaj-art-5dd50e5bbe1e42e4aceb82670b785856
institution OA Journals
issn 2331-186X
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Education
spelling doaj-art-5dd50e5bbe1e42e4aceb82670b7858562025-08-20T02:23:56ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Education2331-186X2025-12-0112110.1080/2331186X.2025.2504245UK Built Environment postgraduate programme provision: sectoral context, viability and educational implicationsAlan M. Forster0Laurent Galbrun1Nick Pilcher2Stuart Tennant3Nigel Craig4Mike Murray5School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure & Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UKSchool of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure & Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UKThe Business School, Edinburgh Napier University, UKSchool of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences (CEPS), University of the West of Scotland (UWS), Paisley, UKSchool of Computing, Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UKDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UKPostgraduate (PG) Built Environment education provides higher level skills, yet, concerns of losing such provision exist, as UK universities are experiencing financial challenges from systemic governmental underfunding. This article presents survey findings evaluating three areas in PG Built Environment provision: (i) Institutional context and programmes offerings; (ii) Programme viability and institutional decision making; and (iii) Implications of change in programme offerings. Collectively, these support an understanding of ‘What is offered?’ ‘What is viable?’ and ‘What is the result of change in provision?’ Participants included Senior academics from a range of UK universities and disciplines. Results suggest more PG programmes are being opened (72%) than closed (35%), reflecting institutional aspirations to grow numbers via new offerings. No consensus exists regarding numbers for financial viability, although 10 to 30 students was commonly noted. Decisions to open and close programmes are largely ‘top-down’, from University Executive or Head of School, whilst arguments for retaining programmes with low student numbers typically come from staff at programme level. Regarding implications of change, policy makers are encouraged to engage with universities, employers and professional bodies, as findings point towards more online PG degrees, Continuing Professional Development activities and inhouse specialist training.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2504245Built environmentpostgraduate educationviabilityprofessional bodiesEngineering EducationBuilding and Construction
spellingShingle Alan M. Forster
Laurent Galbrun
Nick Pilcher
Stuart Tennant
Nigel Craig
Mike Murray
UK Built Environment postgraduate programme provision: sectoral context, viability and educational implications
Cogent Education
Built environment
postgraduate education
viability
professional bodies
Engineering Education
Building and Construction
title UK Built Environment postgraduate programme provision: sectoral context, viability and educational implications
title_full UK Built Environment postgraduate programme provision: sectoral context, viability and educational implications
title_fullStr UK Built Environment postgraduate programme provision: sectoral context, viability and educational implications
title_full_unstemmed UK Built Environment postgraduate programme provision: sectoral context, viability and educational implications
title_short UK Built Environment postgraduate programme provision: sectoral context, viability and educational implications
title_sort uk built environment postgraduate programme provision sectoral context viability and educational implications
topic Built environment
postgraduate education
viability
professional bodies
Engineering Education
Building and Construction
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2504245
work_keys_str_mv AT alanmforster ukbuiltenvironmentpostgraduateprogrammeprovisionsectoralcontextviabilityandeducationalimplications
AT laurentgalbrun ukbuiltenvironmentpostgraduateprogrammeprovisionsectoralcontextviabilityandeducationalimplications
AT nickpilcher ukbuiltenvironmentpostgraduateprogrammeprovisionsectoralcontextviabilityandeducationalimplications
AT stuarttennant ukbuiltenvironmentpostgraduateprogrammeprovisionsectoralcontextviabilityandeducationalimplications
AT nigelcraig ukbuiltenvironmentpostgraduateprogrammeprovisionsectoralcontextviabilityandeducationalimplications
AT mikemurray ukbuiltenvironmentpostgraduateprogrammeprovisionsectoralcontextviabilityandeducationalimplications