Structured follow-up pathway to address unmet needs after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (SUPPORT TIA): Feasibility study and process evaluation.
<h4>Background</h4>Care following transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke is variable and often leaves patients feeling abandoned and uncertain. We developed a theoretically-informed, multifaceted intervention which comprised nurse-led, structured follow-up at 4 weeks after TIA...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317425 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849762015759826944 |
|---|---|
| author | Grace M Turner Melanie Calvert Robbie Foy Lou Atkins Philip Collis Sarah Tearne Sue Jowett Kelly Handley Jonathan Mant |
| author_facet | Grace M Turner Melanie Calvert Robbie Foy Lou Atkins Philip Collis Sarah Tearne Sue Jowett Kelly Handley Jonathan Mant |
| author_sort | Grace M Turner |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Care following transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke is variable and often leaves patients feeling abandoned and uncertain. We developed a theoretically-informed, multifaceted intervention which comprised nurse-led, structured follow-up at 4 weeks after TIA/minor stroke to identify and address patient needs. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of both the intervention and procedures to inform a future randomised controlled trial.<h4>Method</h4>We conducted a multicentre, randomised feasibility study with mixed-methods process evaluation (ISRCTN registry reference: ISRCTN39864003). We collected patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 1, 12 and 24 weeks and clinical data at baseline and 24 weeks. The process evaluation comprised qualitative interviews with a sub-sample, feedback questionnaires, and observations of intervention delivery.<h4>Results</h4>We recruited 54 patients over 12 months, achieving 90% of the target sample size (n = 60). PROMs return rates were 94.4% (51/54), 85.2% (46/54) and 71.1% (27/38) at 1, 12, and 24-weeks, respectively. Intervention fidelity was high and the intervention largely aligned with the theoretical underpinnings. The process evaluation illustrated how patients benefitted from the intervention through support they would not have received through usual care. This included direct referral or signposting to support services, information and education, actionable advice, and reassurance about and normalisation of recovery. The trial design was feasible and acceptable for both patients and clinicians.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Nurse-led, structured follow-up after TIA and minor stroke is feasible, acceptable and valued by patients and clinicians. Our intervention can identify and help address unmet needs. A definitive randomised trial to evaluate intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness is feasible and acceptable. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5da9ec8b8e654004b162099b86b2db31 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-5da9ec8b8e654004b162099b86b2db312025-08-20T03:05:50ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01203e031742510.1371/journal.pone.0317425Structured follow-up pathway to address unmet needs after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (SUPPORT TIA): Feasibility study and process evaluation.Grace M TurnerMelanie CalvertRobbie FoyLou AtkinsPhilip CollisSarah TearneSue JowettKelly HandleyJonathan Mant<h4>Background</h4>Care following transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke is variable and often leaves patients feeling abandoned and uncertain. We developed a theoretically-informed, multifaceted intervention which comprised nurse-led, structured follow-up at 4 weeks after TIA/minor stroke to identify and address patient needs. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of both the intervention and procedures to inform a future randomised controlled trial.<h4>Method</h4>We conducted a multicentre, randomised feasibility study with mixed-methods process evaluation (ISRCTN registry reference: ISRCTN39864003). We collected patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 1, 12 and 24 weeks and clinical data at baseline and 24 weeks. The process evaluation comprised qualitative interviews with a sub-sample, feedback questionnaires, and observations of intervention delivery.<h4>Results</h4>We recruited 54 patients over 12 months, achieving 90% of the target sample size (n = 60). PROMs return rates were 94.4% (51/54), 85.2% (46/54) and 71.1% (27/38) at 1, 12, and 24-weeks, respectively. Intervention fidelity was high and the intervention largely aligned with the theoretical underpinnings. The process evaluation illustrated how patients benefitted from the intervention through support they would not have received through usual care. This included direct referral or signposting to support services, information and education, actionable advice, and reassurance about and normalisation of recovery. The trial design was feasible and acceptable for both patients and clinicians.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Nurse-led, structured follow-up after TIA and minor stroke is feasible, acceptable and valued by patients and clinicians. Our intervention can identify and help address unmet needs. A definitive randomised trial to evaluate intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness is feasible and acceptable.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317425 |
| spellingShingle | Grace M Turner Melanie Calvert Robbie Foy Lou Atkins Philip Collis Sarah Tearne Sue Jowett Kelly Handley Jonathan Mant Structured follow-up pathway to address unmet needs after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (SUPPORT TIA): Feasibility study and process evaluation. PLoS ONE |
| title | Structured follow-up pathway to address unmet needs after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (SUPPORT TIA): Feasibility study and process evaluation. |
| title_full | Structured follow-up pathway to address unmet needs after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (SUPPORT TIA): Feasibility study and process evaluation. |
| title_fullStr | Structured follow-up pathway to address unmet needs after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (SUPPORT TIA): Feasibility study and process evaluation. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Structured follow-up pathway to address unmet needs after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (SUPPORT TIA): Feasibility study and process evaluation. |
| title_short | Structured follow-up pathway to address unmet needs after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (SUPPORT TIA): Feasibility study and process evaluation. |
| title_sort | structured follow up pathway to address unmet needs after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke support tia feasibility study and process evaluation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317425 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gracemturner structuredfollowuppathwaytoaddressunmetneedsaftertransientischaemicattackandminorstrokesupporttiafeasibilitystudyandprocessevaluation AT melaniecalvert structuredfollowuppathwaytoaddressunmetneedsaftertransientischaemicattackandminorstrokesupporttiafeasibilitystudyandprocessevaluation AT robbiefoy structuredfollowuppathwaytoaddressunmetneedsaftertransientischaemicattackandminorstrokesupporttiafeasibilitystudyandprocessevaluation AT louatkins structuredfollowuppathwaytoaddressunmetneedsaftertransientischaemicattackandminorstrokesupporttiafeasibilitystudyandprocessevaluation AT philipcollis structuredfollowuppathwaytoaddressunmetneedsaftertransientischaemicattackandminorstrokesupporttiafeasibilitystudyandprocessevaluation AT sarahtearne structuredfollowuppathwaytoaddressunmetneedsaftertransientischaemicattackandminorstrokesupporttiafeasibilitystudyandprocessevaluation AT suejowett structuredfollowuppathwaytoaddressunmetneedsaftertransientischaemicattackandminorstrokesupporttiafeasibilitystudyandprocessevaluation AT kellyhandley structuredfollowuppathwaytoaddressunmetneedsaftertransientischaemicattackandminorstrokesupporttiafeasibilitystudyandprocessevaluation AT jonathanmant structuredfollowuppathwaytoaddressunmetneedsaftertransientischaemicattackandminorstrokesupporttiafeasibilitystudyandprocessevaluation |