Intratumoral STING agonist reverses immune evasion in PD-(L)1-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: mechanistic insights from detailed biomarker analyses

Background Antibodies blocking programmed death (PD)-1 or its ligand (PD-L1) have revolutionized cancer care, but many patients do not experience durable benefits. Novel treatments to stimulate antitumor immunity are needed in the PD-(L)1 refractory setting. The stimulator of interferon genes (STING...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shailender Bhatia, Paul Nghiem, Rima Kulikauskas, Candice Church, David M Koelle, Lisa Tachiki, Kimberly Smythe, Thomas Pulliam, Shira Tabachnick-Cherny, Saumya Jani, Peter H Goff, Rashmi Bhakuni, Brandon W Seaton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-10-01
Series:Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Online Access:https://jitc.bmj.com/content/12/10/e009803.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850146676513177600
author Shailender Bhatia
Paul Nghiem
Rima Kulikauskas
Candice Church
David M Koelle
Lisa Tachiki
Kimberly Smythe
Thomas Pulliam
Shira Tabachnick-Cherny
Saumya Jani
Peter H Goff
Rashmi Bhakuni
Brandon W Seaton
author_facet Shailender Bhatia
Paul Nghiem
Rima Kulikauskas
Candice Church
David M Koelle
Lisa Tachiki
Kimberly Smythe
Thomas Pulliam
Shira Tabachnick-Cherny
Saumya Jani
Peter H Goff
Rashmi Bhakuni
Brandon W Seaton
author_sort Shailender Bhatia
collection DOAJ
description Background Antibodies blocking programmed death (PD)-1 or its ligand (PD-L1) have revolutionized cancer care, but many patients do not experience durable benefits. Novel treatments to stimulate antitumor immunity are needed in the PD-(L)1 refractory setting. The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) protein, an innate sensor of cytoplasmic DNA, is a promising target with several agonists in development. However, response rates in most recent clinical trials have been low and mechanisms of response remain unclear. We report detailed biomarker analyses in a patient with anti-PD-L1 refractory, Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)-positive, metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) who was treated with an intratumoral (IT) STING agonist (ADU-S100) plus intravenous anti-PD-1 antibody (spartalizumab) and experienced a durable objective response with regression of both injected and non-injected lesions.Methods We analyzed pretreatment and post-treatment tumor and peripheral blood samples from our patient with single-cell RNA sequencing, 30-parameter flow cytometry, T cell receptor sequencing, and multiplexed immunohistochemistry. We analyzed cancer-specific CD8 T cells using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-I tetramers loaded with MCPyV peptides. We also analyzed STING expression and signaling in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of 88 additional MCC tumor specimens and in MCC cell lines.Results We observed high levels of MCPyV-specific T cells (12% of T cells) in our patient’s tumor at baseline. These cancer-specific CD8 T cells exhibited characteristics of exhaustion including high TOX and low TCF1 proteins. Following treatment with STING-agonist plus anti-PD-1, IT CD8 T cells expanded threefold. We also observed evidence of likely improved antigen presentation in the MCC TME (greater than fourfold increase of HLA-I-positive cancer cells). STING expression was not detected in any cancer cells within our patient’s tumor or in 88 other MCC tumors, however high STING expression was observed in immune and stromal cells within all 89 MCC tumors.Conclusions Our results suggest that STING agonists may be able to work indirectly in MCC via signaling through immune and stromal cells in the TME, and may not necessarily need STING expression in the cancer cells. This approach may be particularly effective in tumors that are already infiltrated by inflammatory cells in the TME but are evading immune detection via HLA-I downregulation.
format Article
id doaj-art-5d97ea745ca64b74a14af5ba8a97b20b
institution OA Journals
issn 2051-1426
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
spelling doaj-art-5d97ea745ca64b74a14af5ba8a97b20b2025-08-20T02:27:46ZengBMJ Publishing GroupJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer2051-14262024-10-01121010.1136/jitc-2024-009803Intratumoral STING agonist reverses immune evasion in PD-(L)1-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: mechanistic insights from detailed biomarker analysesShailender Bhatia0Paul Nghiem1Rima Kulikauskas2Candice Church3David M Koelle4Lisa Tachiki5Kimberly Smythe6Thomas Pulliam7Shira Tabachnick-Cherny8Saumya Jani9Peter H Goff10Rashmi Bhakuni11Brandon W Seaton122Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USADepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USADepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USADepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USAFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USAFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USAFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA3Department of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USADepartment of Dermatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA6Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA1University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USABackground Antibodies blocking programmed death (PD)-1 or its ligand (PD-L1) have revolutionized cancer care, but many patients do not experience durable benefits. Novel treatments to stimulate antitumor immunity are needed in the PD-(L)1 refractory setting. The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) protein, an innate sensor of cytoplasmic DNA, is a promising target with several agonists in development. However, response rates in most recent clinical trials have been low and mechanisms of response remain unclear. We report detailed biomarker analyses in a patient with anti-PD-L1 refractory, Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)-positive, metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) who was treated with an intratumoral (IT) STING agonist (ADU-S100) plus intravenous anti-PD-1 antibody (spartalizumab) and experienced a durable objective response with regression of both injected and non-injected lesions.Methods We analyzed pretreatment and post-treatment tumor and peripheral blood samples from our patient with single-cell RNA sequencing, 30-parameter flow cytometry, T cell receptor sequencing, and multiplexed immunohistochemistry. We analyzed cancer-specific CD8 T cells using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-I tetramers loaded with MCPyV peptides. We also analyzed STING expression and signaling in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of 88 additional MCC tumor specimens and in MCC cell lines.Results We observed high levels of MCPyV-specific T cells (12% of T cells) in our patient’s tumor at baseline. These cancer-specific CD8 T cells exhibited characteristics of exhaustion including high TOX and low TCF1 proteins. Following treatment with STING-agonist plus anti-PD-1, IT CD8 T cells expanded threefold. We also observed evidence of likely improved antigen presentation in the MCC TME (greater than fourfold increase of HLA-I-positive cancer cells). STING expression was not detected in any cancer cells within our patient’s tumor or in 88 other MCC tumors, however high STING expression was observed in immune and stromal cells within all 89 MCC tumors.Conclusions Our results suggest that STING agonists may be able to work indirectly in MCC via signaling through immune and stromal cells in the TME, and may not necessarily need STING expression in the cancer cells. This approach may be particularly effective in tumors that are already infiltrated by inflammatory cells in the TME but are evading immune detection via HLA-I downregulation.https://jitc.bmj.com/content/12/10/e009803.full
spellingShingle Shailender Bhatia
Paul Nghiem
Rima Kulikauskas
Candice Church
David M Koelle
Lisa Tachiki
Kimberly Smythe
Thomas Pulliam
Shira Tabachnick-Cherny
Saumya Jani
Peter H Goff
Rashmi Bhakuni
Brandon W Seaton
Intratumoral STING agonist reverses immune evasion in PD-(L)1-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: mechanistic insights from detailed biomarker analyses
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
title Intratumoral STING agonist reverses immune evasion in PD-(L)1-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: mechanistic insights from detailed biomarker analyses
title_full Intratumoral STING agonist reverses immune evasion in PD-(L)1-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: mechanistic insights from detailed biomarker analyses
title_fullStr Intratumoral STING agonist reverses immune evasion in PD-(L)1-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: mechanistic insights from detailed biomarker analyses
title_full_unstemmed Intratumoral STING agonist reverses immune evasion in PD-(L)1-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: mechanistic insights from detailed biomarker analyses
title_short Intratumoral STING agonist reverses immune evasion in PD-(L)1-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: mechanistic insights from detailed biomarker analyses
title_sort intratumoral sting agonist reverses immune evasion in pd l 1 refractory merkel cell carcinoma mechanistic insights from detailed biomarker analyses
url https://jitc.bmj.com/content/12/10/e009803.full
work_keys_str_mv AT shailenderbhatia intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT paulnghiem intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT rimakulikauskas intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT candicechurch intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT davidmkoelle intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT lisatachiki intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT kimberlysmythe intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT thomaspulliam intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT shiratabachnickcherny intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT saumyajani intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT peterhgoff intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT rashmibhakuni intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses
AT brandonwseaton intratumoralstingagonistreversesimmuneevasioninpdl1refractorymerkelcellcarcinomamechanisticinsightsfromdetailedbiomarkeranalyses