Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Distal Radius Fractures in Osteoporosis: A Comparative Review

Osteoporosis is a common yet underdiagnosed condition that increases the risk of fractures, contributing to substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are some of the most common fractures associated with osteoporosis and often precede more severe fracture...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric J. Gullborg, Jason H. Kim, Caitlin M. Ward, Xavier C. Simcock
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/11/1848
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850226441488171008
author Eric J. Gullborg
Jason H. Kim
Caitlin M. Ward
Xavier C. Simcock
author_facet Eric J. Gullborg
Jason H. Kim
Caitlin M. Ward
Xavier C. Simcock
author_sort Eric J. Gullborg
collection DOAJ
description Osteoporosis is a common yet underdiagnosed condition that increases the risk of fractures, contributing to substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are some of the most common fractures associated with osteoporosis and often precede more severe fractures. Managing DRFs in patients with osteoporosis can be a challenge due to altered bone quality, which can affect healing and surgical fixation. This review examines both operative and nonoperative management strategies for DRFs in osteoporotic patients, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment. Surgical interventions, like open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating, can facilitate early mobilization and improved alignment, especially in more active patients. However, osteoporosis poses risks such as hardware failure, infection, and malunion, calling for careful patient selection. Conversely, nonoperative management may be more suitable for patients with lower functional demands or higher surgical risks, despite the increased risk of malunion. By adapting treatment strategies to individual patient characteristics, orthopedic surgeons can optimize outcomes, minimize complications, and potentially prevent future fractures. Both operative and nonoperative treatments can yield positive outcomes when personalized to the patient’s needs.
format Article
id doaj-art-5d8641abb38149f685c7f0472bf3f3b1
institution OA Journals
issn 1010-660X
1648-9144
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj-art-5d8641abb38149f685c7f0472bf3f3b12025-08-20T02:05:04ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442024-11-016011184810.3390/medicina60111848Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Distal Radius Fractures in Osteoporosis: A Comparative ReviewEric J. Gullborg0Jason H. Kim1Caitlin M. Ward2Xavier C. Simcock3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USAOsteoporosis is a common yet underdiagnosed condition that increases the risk of fractures, contributing to substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are some of the most common fractures associated with osteoporosis and often precede more severe fractures. Managing DRFs in patients with osteoporosis can be a challenge due to altered bone quality, which can affect healing and surgical fixation. This review examines both operative and nonoperative management strategies for DRFs in osteoporotic patients, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment. Surgical interventions, like open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating, can facilitate early mobilization and improved alignment, especially in more active patients. However, osteoporosis poses risks such as hardware failure, infection, and malunion, calling for careful patient selection. Conversely, nonoperative management may be more suitable for patients with lower functional demands or higher surgical risks, despite the increased risk of malunion. By adapting treatment strategies to individual patient characteristics, orthopedic surgeons can optimize outcomes, minimize complications, and potentially prevent future fractures. Both operative and nonoperative treatments can yield positive outcomes when personalized to the patient’s needs.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/11/1848distal radius fracturesosteoporosisoperative managementnonoperative managementage
spellingShingle Eric J. Gullborg
Jason H. Kim
Caitlin M. Ward
Xavier C. Simcock
Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Distal Radius Fractures in Osteoporosis: A Comparative Review
Medicina
distal radius fractures
osteoporosis
operative management
nonoperative management
age
title Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Distal Radius Fractures in Osteoporosis: A Comparative Review
title_full Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Distal Radius Fractures in Osteoporosis: A Comparative Review
title_fullStr Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Distal Radius Fractures in Osteoporosis: A Comparative Review
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Distal Radius Fractures in Osteoporosis: A Comparative Review
title_short Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Distal Radius Fractures in Osteoporosis: A Comparative Review
title_sort optimizing treatment strategies for distal radius fractures in osteoporosis a comparative review
topic distal radius fractures
osteoporosis
operative management
nonoperative management
age
url https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/60/11/1848
work_keys_str_mv AT ericjgullborg optimizingtreatmentstrategiesfordistalradiusfracturesinosteoporosisacomparativereview
AT jasonhkim optimizingtreatmentstrategiesfordistalradiusfracturesinosteoporosisacomparativereview
AT caitlinmward optimizingtreatmentstrategiesfordistalradiusfracturesinosteoporosisacomparativereview
AT xaviercsimcock optimizingtreatmentstrategiesfordistalradiusfracturesinosteoporosisacomparativereview