How Select Strength and Power Measures Relate to FCS Football On-Field Performance

<b>Objective:</b> Understanding unique ways that strength and power contribute to on-field performance in collegiate-based American football might aid coaches in recruiting and determining starters. Using retrospective analysis of existing data, including starting status (STR) and number...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seth Long, Nanette V. Lopez, Jay T. Sutliffe, Dierdra Bycura, Jessica R. Szczepanski, Scott N. Drum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/10/2/193
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849431922147590144
author Seth Long
Nanette V. Lopez
Jay T. Sutliffe
Dierdra Bycura
Jessica R. Szczepanski
Scott N. Drum
author_facet Seth Long
Nanette V. Lopez
Jay T. Sutliffe
Dierdra Bycura
Jessica R. Szczepanski
Scott N. Drum
author_sort Seth Long
collection DOAJ
description <b>Objective:</b> Understanding unique ways that strength and power contribute to on-field performance in collegiate-based American football might aid coaches in recruiting and determining starters. Using retrospective analysis of existing data, including starting status (STR) and number of defensive tackles or contributing plays (CP), we sought a viable strategy to observe on-field play. Our purpose was to determine what role baseline and in-season strength, and power metrics contributed to on-field football performance (e.g., using STR and CP) from one Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) university. We hypothesized greater pre-season (baseline) and in-season (repeated variables) strength and power outcomes would lead to an increased number of STR among players (<i>n</i> = 53) as well as CP among defensive players (<i>n</i> = 30). <b>Method:</b> Power, determined through countermovement jump (CMJ) was observed weekly using a VALD Performance force deck (i.e., jump height) over a 9-week, in-season period (excluding weeks 6 and 8, a bye week, and erroneous data, respectively). Baseline measures of strength and power were also collected at the beginning of the season for each player using four specific measurements, namely the following: (a) peak vertical jump; (b) pull-ups to failure; (c) a one rep max for bench press; (d) power clean. Pearson’s correlation was used to correlate baseline measures and weekly power, along with baseline measures and the total number of STR and CP each week. Additionally, linear regressions were used to examine the effects of baseline measures (vertical jump, bench press) on STR and CP. <b>Results:</b> Moderate correlations (r > 0.5) were observed between baseline variables and weekly CMJ measures. Baseline measures of power clean were correlated with CP only in week 4. All other analyses were not significant. <b>Conclusions:</b> Since our on-field performance variables were not significant, future research should focus on more potent variables, as reported in the literature, such as football IQ, initial recruiting status, and psychological resilience, in addition to accounting for strength and power metrics.
format Article
id doaj-art-5d6dba702c0f458d849fbbcae7eb233e
institution Kabale University
issn 2411-5142
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
spelling doaj-art-5d6dba702c0f458d849fbbcae7eb233e2025-08-20T03:27:29ZengMDPI AGJournal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology2411-51422025-05-0110219310.3390/jfmk10020193How Select Strength and Power Measures Relate to FCS Football On-Field PerformanceSeth Long0Nanette V. Lopez1Jay T. Sutliffe2Dierdra Bycura3Jessica R. Szczepanski4Scott N. Drum5Health Sciences Department, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USAHealth Sciences Department, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USAHealth Sciences Department, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USAHealth Sciences Department, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USAHealth Sciences Department, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USAHealth Sciences Department, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA<b>Objective:</b> Understanding unique ways that strength and power contribute to on-field performance in collegiate-based American football might aid coaches in recruiting and determining starters. Using retrospective analysis of existing data, including starting status (STR) and number of defensive tackles or contributing plays (CP), we sought a viable strategy to observe on-field play. Our purpose was to determine what role baseline and in-season strength, and power metrics contributed to on-field football performance (e.g., using STR and CP) from one Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) university. We hypothesized greater pre-season (baseline) and in-season (repeated variables) strength and power outcomes would lead to an increased number of STR among players (<i>n</i> = 53) as well as CP among defensive players (<i>n</i> = 30). <b>Method:</b> Power, determined through countermovement jump (CMJ) was observed weekly using a VALD Performance force deck (i.e., jump height) over a 9-week, in-season period (excluding weeks 6 and 8, a bye week, and erroneous data, respectively). Baseline measures of strength and power were also collected at the beginning of the season for each player using four specific measurements, namely the following: (a) peak vertical jump; (b) pull-ups to failure; (c) a one rep max for bench press; (d) power clean. Pearson’s correlation was used to correlate baseline measures and weekly power, along with baseline measures and the total number of STR and CP each week. Additionally, linear regressions were used to examine the effects of baseline measures (vertical jump, bench press) on STR and CP. <b>Results:</b> Moderate correlations (r > 0.5) were observed between baseline variables and weekly CMJ measures. Baseline measures of power clean were correlated with CP only in week 4. All other analyses were not significant. <b>Conclusions:</b> Since our on-field performance variables were not significant, future research should focus on more potent variables, as reported in the literature, such as football IQ, initial recruiting status, and psychological resilience, in addition to accounting for strength and power metrics.https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/10/2/193athletecompetitionsportplaymakerAmerican footballrecruit
spellingShingle Seth Long
Nanette V. Lopez
Jay T. Sutliffe
Dierdra Bycura
Jessica R. Szczepanski
Scott N. Drum
How Select Strength and Power Measures Relate to FCS Football On-Field Performance
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
athlete
competition
sport
playmaker
American football
recruit
title How Select Strength and Power Measures Relate to FCS Football On-Field Performance
title_full How Select Strength and Power Measures Relate to FCS Football On-Field Performance
title_fullStr How Select Strength and Power Measures Relate to FCS Football On-Field Performance
title_full_unstemmed How Select Strength and Power Measures Relate to FCS Football On-Field Performance
title_short How Select Strength and Power Measures Relate to FCS Football On-Field Performance
title_sort how select strength and power measures relate to fcs football on field performance
topic athlete
competition
sport
playmaker
American football
recruit
url https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/10/2/193
work_keys_str_mv AT sethlong howselectstrengthandpowermeasuresrelatetofcsfootballonfieldperformance
AT nanettevlopez howselectstrengthandpowermeasuresrelatetofcsfootballonfieldperformance
AT jaytsutliffe howselectstrengthandpowermeasuresrelatetofcsfootballonfieldperformance
AT dierdrabycura howselectstrengthandpowermeasuresrelatetofcsfootballonfieldperformance
AT jessicarszczepanski howselectstrengthandpowermeasuresrelatetofcsfootballonfieldperformance
AT scottndrum howselectstrengthandpowermeasuresrelatetofcsfootballonfieldperformance