Validation of data quality in the Swedish quality register of gynecologic cancer for cervical cancer and vulvar cancer—a Swedish gynecologic cancer group (Swe‐GCG) study

Abstract Introduction Population‐based registers provide an important source of real‐world data. The growing number of large cohort studies using data from cancer registers makes validation of such registers important. The Swedish Quality Register of Gynecologic Cancer (SQRGC) is a nationwide popula...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Bjurberg, Kristina Hellman, Tim A. Säll, Christian Staf, Christer Borgfeldt, Erik Holmberg, Jenny Jönsson, Gabriel Lindahl, Angelique Flöter Rådestad, Camilla Sköld, Katja Stenström Bohlin, Karin Stålberg, Elisabeth Åvall‐Lundqvist, Preben Kjølhede, Pernilla Dahm‐Kähler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-08-01
Series:Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15152
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849421691060486144
author Maria Bjurberg
Kristina Hellman
Tim A. Säll
Christian Staf
Christer Borgfeldt
Erik Holmberg
Jenny Jönsson
Gabriel Lindahl
Angelique Flöter Rådestad
Camilla Sköld
Katja Stenström Bohlin
Karin Stålberg
Elisabeth Åvall‐Lundqvist
Preben Kjølhede
Pernilla Dahm‐Kähler
author_facet Maria Bjurberg
Kristina Hellman
Tim A. Säll
Christian Staf
Christer Borgfeldt
Erik Holmberg
Jenny Jönsson
Gabriel Lindahl
Angelique Flöter Rådestad
Camilla Sköld
Katja Stenström Bohlin
Karin Stålberg
Elisabeth Åvall‐Lundqvist
Preben Kjølhede
Pernilla Dahm‐Kähler
author_sort Maria Bjurberg
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Population‐based registers provide an important source of real‐world data. The growing number of large cohort studies using data from cancer registers makes validation of such registers important. The Swedish Quality Register of Gynecologic Cancer (SQRGC) is a nationwide population‐based register containing data on patient and tumor characteristics, treatment, and follow‐up. To ensure that the results from research and quality assurance reports using SQRGC data are robust and reliable, the accuracy and completeness of the register need to be validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of data on cervical cancer and vulvar cancer in the SQRGC. Material and Methods Quality of data in the SQRGC was investigated by evaluating completeness, timeliness, comparability, and validity in accordance with recommendations from the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the national Swedish guidelines on validation of cancer registers. Completeness was evaluated by coverage relative to the Swedish National Cancer Register, and timeliness as the time from diagnosis until entry into the SQRGC. We randomly selected 276 women diagnosed with cervical cancer (n = 138) and vulvar cancer (n = 138) between 2014 and 2019 for validation. An external monitor manually re‐abstracted data on 10 core variables per sub‐register from the patients' medical records. Comparability was assessed by reviewing the adherence to international standards regarding coding. Validity was evaluated by the agreement between re‐abstracted data and original data in the SQRGC. Correlations were estimated using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results For cervical cancer, the completeness was 99% and the timeliness was 87.1% within 12 months. The corresponding figures for vulvar cancer were 100% and 87.9%, respectively. Adherence to international coding standards was satisfactory. The median degree of agreement between re‐abstracted data and data in the SQRGC was 90.8% (range 73.2%–100%) for cervical cancer, and 85.4% (range 59.6%–98.2%) for vulvar cancer. Conclusions The data on cervical and vulvar cancer in the SQRGC are of adequate quality and may well be used for research and clinical purposes.
format Article
id doaj-art-5d23bac5fcb540d28c8f5dfe4500ff59
institution Kabale University
issn 0001-6349
1600-0412
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
spelling doaj-art-5d23bac5fcb540d28c8f5dfe4500ff592025-08-20T03:31:24ZengWileyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica0001-63491600-04122025-08-0110481530153810.1111/aogs.15152Validation of data quality in the Swedish quality register of gynecologic cancer for cervical cancer and vulvar cancer—a Swedish gynecologic cancer group (Swe‐GCG) studyMaria Bjurberg0Kristina Hellman1Tim A. Säll2Christian Staf3Christer Borgfeldt4Erik Holmberg5Jenny Jönsson6Gabriel Lindahl7Angelique Flöter Rådestad8Camilla Sköld9Katja Stenström Bohlin10Karin Stålberg11Elisabeth Åvall‐Lundqvist12Preben Kjølhede13Pernilla Dahm‐Kähler14Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University Lund SwedenDepartment of Gynecologic Cancer, Theme Cancer Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm SwedenRegional Cancer Center Western Sweden Gothenburg SwedenRegional Cancer Center Western Sweden Gothenburg SwedenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Linköping University Linköping SwedenRegional Cancer Center Western Sweden Gothenburg SwedenDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund University Lund SwedenDepartment of Oncology, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Linköping University Linköping SwedenDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology Karolinska Institute Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology Uppsala University Uppsala SwedenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg SwedenDepartment of Women's and Children's Health Uppsala University Uppsala SwedenDepartment of Oncology, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Linköping University Linköping SwedenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Linköping University Linköping SwedenRegional Cancer Center Western Sweden Gothenburg SwedenAbstract Introduction Population‐based registers provide an important source of real‐world data. The growing number of large cohort studies using data from cancer registers makes validation of such registers important. The Swedish Quality Register of Gynecologic Cancer (SQRGC) is a nationwide population‐based register containing data on patient and tumor characteristics, treatment, and follow‐up. To ensure that the results from research and quality assurance reports using SQRGC data are robust and reliable, the accuracy and completeness of the register need to be validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of data on cervical cancer and vulvar cancer in the SQRGC. Material and Methods Quality of data in the SQRGC was investigated by evaluating completeness, timeliness, comparability, and validity in accordance with recommendations from the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the national Swedish guidelines on validation of cancer registers. Completeness was evaluated by coverage relative to the Swedish National Cancer Register, and timeliness as the time from diagnosis until entry into the SQRGC. We randomly selected 276 women diagnosed with cervical cancer (n = 138) and vulvar cancer (n = 138) between 2014 and 2019 for validation. An external monitor manually re‐abstracted data on 10 core variables per sub‐register from the patients' medical records. Comparability was assessed by reviewing the adherence to international standards regarding coding. Validity was evaluated by the agreement between re‐abstracted data and original data in the SQRGC. Correlations were estimated using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cohen's kappa coefficient. Results For cervical cancer, the completeness was 99% and the timeliness was 87.1% within 12 months. The corresponding figures for vulvar cancer were 100% and 87.9%, respectively. Adherence to international coding standards was satisfactory. The median degree of agreement between re‐abstracted data and data in the SQRGC was 90.8% (range 73.2%–100%) for cervical cancer, and 85.4% (range 59.6%–98.2%) for vulvar cancer. Conclusions The data on cervical and vulvar cancer in the SQRGC are of adequate quality and may well be used for research and clinical purposes.https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15152cancer registercervical cancerdata qualityquality registervalidationvulvar cancer
spellingShingle Maria Bjurberg
Kristina Hellman
Tim A. Säll
Christian Staf
Christer Borgfeldt
Erik Holmberg
Jenny Jönsson
Gabriel Lindahl
Angelique Flöter Rådestad
Camilla Sköld
Katja Stenström Bohlin
Karin Stålberg
Elisabeth Åvall‐Lundqvist
Preben Kjølhede
Pernilla Dahm‐Kähler
Validation of data quality in the Swedish quality register of gynecologic cancer for cervical cancer and vulvar cancer—a Swedish gynecologic cancer group (Swe‐GCG) study
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
cancer register
cervical cancer
data quality
quality register
validation
vulvar cancer
title Validation of data quality in the Swedish quality register of gynecologic cancer for cervical cancer and vulvar cancer—a Swedish gynecologic cancer group (Swe‐GCG) study
title_full Validation of data quality in the Swedish quality register of gynecologic cancer for cervical cancer and vulvar cancer—a Swedish gynecologic cancer group (Swe‐GCG) study
title_fullStr Validation of data quality in the Swedish quality register of gynecologic cancer for cervical cancer and vulvar cancer—a Swedish gynecologic cancer group (Swe‐GCG) study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of data quality in the Swedish quality register of gynecologic cancer for cervical cancer and vulvar cancer—a Swedish gynecologic cancer group (Swe‐GCG) study
title_short Validation of data quality in the Swedish quality register of gynecologic cancer for cervical cancer and vulvar cancer—a Swedish gynecologic cancer group (Swe‐GCG) study
title_sort validation of data quality in the swedish quality register of gynecologic cancer for cervical cancer and vulvar cancer a swedish gynecologic cancer group swe gcg study
topic cancer register
cervical cancer
data quality
quality register
validation
vulvar cancer
url https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15152
work_keys_str_mv AT mariabjurberg validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT kristinahellman validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT timasall validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT christianstaf validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT christerborgfeldt validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT erikholmberg validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT jennyjonsson validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT gabriellindahl validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT angeliquefloterradestad validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT camillaskold validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT katjastenstrombohlin validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT karinstalberg validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT elisabethavalllundqvist validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT prebenkjølhede validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy
AT pernilladahmkahler validationofdataqualityintheswedishqualityregisterofgynecologiccancerforcervicalcancerandvulvarcanceraswedishgynecologiccancergroupswegcgstudy