Perceptions of a Buruli ulcer controlled human infection model: How, who, and why?

<h4>Background</h4>Infection with Mycobacterium ulcerans causes slowly progressive skin lesions known as Buruli ulcer (BU). An M. ulcerans controlled human infection model (MuCHIM) is likely to accelerate our understanding of this otherwise neglected disease, and may be an efficient plat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen Muhi, Simone Schmidt, Julia L Marshall, Daniel P O'Brien, Paul D R Johnson, James S McCarthy, Euzebiusz Jamrozik, Joshua Osowicki, Timothy P Stinear
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-02-01
Series:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012593
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850186670607958016
author Stephen Muhi
Simone Schmidt
Julia L Marshall
Daniel P O'Brien
Paul D R Johnson
James S McCarthy
Euzebiusz Jamrozik
Joshua Osowicki
Timothy P Stinear
author_facet Stephen Muhi
Simone Schmidt
Julia L Marshall
Daniel P O'Brien
Paul D R Johnson
James S McCarthy
Euzebiusz Jamrozik
Joshua Osowicki
Timothy P Stinear
author_sort Stephen Muhi
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Infection with Mycobacterium ulcerans causes slowly progressive skin lesions known as Buruli ulcer (BU). An M. ulcerans controlled human infection model (MuCHIM) is likely to accelerate our understanding of this otherwise neglected disease, and may be an efficient platform for testing vaccines and other interventions. The aim of this study was to understand perceptions of this model across a range of key stakeholders in an endemic Australian community setting.<h4>Methods</h4>We recruited young adults who live near an Australian BU endemic area but without a personal history of BU, clinicians involved in the management of BU, young adults with a personal history of a small, treated BU, and participants of any age with a demonstrated interest in public advocacy related to their personal BU lived experience. Participants reviewed an abridged version of the provisional protocol. A series of three focus groups were then conducted by video, and the transcribed text was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes for exploration.<h4>Results</h4>Participants universally valued the outcomes that MuCHIM might deliver. The predominant theme was that informed consent required fully transparent communication with potential participants regarding what their participation would involve, how it would impact their lives, and both the expected outcome and 'worst-case scenario'. They also offered actionable recommendations on how best to communicate the tension between the expected outcome and the 'worst-case scenario' of disease associated with delayed diagnosis and comorbidity, as typically portrayed by the media. Participants recommended including images and testimonials from people who have had BU to support the conditions for informed consent. Focus groups also gave a clear sense of who they believed would volunteer for this type of research.<h4>Conclusions</h4>This study offers valuable guidance regarding the content and presentation of information to inform potential participants, with focus group participants suggesting a multimodal approach of communication, including lived experience testimonials and clinical images of the expected outcome. This information will inform development of materials for enrolment to adequately communicate risks and expectations to potential study participants.
format Article
id doaj-art-5d10af264e2e44dfa756f35eed58cd39
institution OA Journals
issn 1935-2727
1935-2735
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
spelling doaj-art-5d10af264e2e44dfa756f35eed58cd392025-08-20T02:16:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27271935-27352025-02-01192e001259310.1371/journal.pntd.0012593Perceptions of a Buruli ulcer controlled human infection model: How, who, and why?Stephen MuhiSimone SchmidtJulia L MarshallDaniel P O'BrienPaul D R JohnsonJames S McCarthyEuzebiusz JamrozikJoshua OsowickiTimothy P Stinear<h4>Background</h4>Infection with Mycobacterium ulcerans causes slowly progressive skin lesions known as Buruli ulcer (BU). An M. ulcerans controlled human infection model (MuCHIM) is likely to accelerate our understanding of this otherwise neglected disease, and may be an efficient platform for testing vaccines and other interventions. The aim of this study was to understand perceptions of this model across a range of key stakeholders in an endemic Australian community setting.<h4>Methods</h4>We recruited young adults who live near an Australian BU endemic area but without a personal history of BU, clinicians involved in the management of BU, young adults with a personal history of a small, treated BU, and participants of any age with a demonstrated interest in public advocacy related to their personal BU lived experience. Participants reviewed an abridged version of the provisional protocol. A series of three focus groups were then conducted by video, and the transcribed text was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes for exploration.<h4>Results</h4>Participants universally valued the outcomes that MuCHIM might deliver. The predominant theme was that informed consent required fully transparent communication with potential participants regarding what their participation would involve, how it would impact their lives, and both the expected outcome and 'worst-case scenario'. They also offered actionable recommendations on how best to communicate the tension between the expected outcome and the 'worst-case scenario' of disease associated with delayed diagnosis and comorbidity, as typically portrayed by the media. Participants recommended including images and testimonials from people who have had BU to support the conditions for informed consent. Focus groups also gave a clear sense of who they believed would volunteer for this type of research.<h4>Conclusions</h4>This study offers valuable guidance regarding the content and presentation of information to inform potential participants, with focus group participants suggesting a multimodal approach of communication, including lived experience testimonials and clinical images of the expected outcome. This information will inform development of materials for enrolment to adequately communicate risks and expectations to potential study participants.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012593
spellingShingle Stephen Muhi
Simone Schmidt
Julia L Marshall
Daniel P O'Brien
Paul D R Johnson
James S McCarthy
Euzebiusz Jamrozik
Joshua Osowicki
Timothy P Stinear
Perceptions of a Buruli ulcer controlled human infection model: How, who, and why?
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
title Perceptions of a Buruli ulcer controlled human infection model: How, who, and why?
title_full Perceptions of a Buruli ulcer controlled human infection model: How, who, and why?
title_fullStr Perceptions of a Buruli ulcer controlled human infection model: How, who, and why?
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of a Buruli ulcer controlled human infection model: How, who, and why?
title_short Perceptions of a Buruli ulcer controlled human infection model: How, who, and why?
title_sort perceptions of a buruli ulcer controlled human infection model how who and why
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012593
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenmuhi perceptionsofaburuliulcercontrolledhumaninfectionmodelhowwhoandwhy
AT simoneschmidt perceptionsofaburuliulcercontrolledhumaninfectionmodelhowwhoandwhy
AT julialmarshall perceptionsofaburuliulcercontrolledhumaninfectionmodelhowwhoandwhy
AT danielpobrien perceptionsofaburuliulcercontrolledhumaninfectionmodelhowwhoandwhy
AT pauldrjohnson perceptionsofaburuliulcercontrolledhumaninfectionmodelhowwhoandwhy
AT jamessmccarthy perceptionsofaburuliulcercontrolledhumaninfectionmodelhowwhoandwhy
AT euzebiuszjamrozik perceptionsofaburuliulcercontrolledhumaninfectionmodelhowwhoandwhy
AT joshuaosowicki perceptionsofaburuliulcercontrolledhumaninfectionmodelhowwhoandwhy
AT timothypstinear perceptionsofaburuliulcercontrolledhumaninfectionmodelhowwhoandwhy