Collection, Collation, and Comparison of 3D Coronal CME Reconstructions

Abstract Predicting the impacts of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is a major focus of current space weather forecasting efforts. Typically, CME properties are reconstructed from stereoscopic coronal images and then used to forward model a CME's interplanetary evolution. Knowing the uncertainty i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Kay, E. Palmerio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003796
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536485286739968
author C. Kay
E. Palmerio
author_facet C. Kay
E. Palmerio
author_sort C. Kay
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Predicting the impacts of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is a major focus of current space weather forecasting efforts. Typically, CME properties are reconstructed from stereoscopic coronal images and then used to forward model a CME's interplanetary evolution. Knowing the uncertainty in the coronal reconstructions is then a critical factor in determining the uncertainty of any predictions. A growing number of catalogs of coronal CME reconstructions exist, but no extensive comparison between these catalogs has yet been performed. Here we develop a Living List of Attributes Measured in Any Coronal Reconstruction (LLAMACoRe), an online collection of individual catalogs, which we intend to continually update. In this first version, we use results from 24 different catalogs with 3D reconstructions using Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory observations between 2007 and 2014. We have collated the individual catalogs, determining which reconstructions correspond to the same events. LLAMACoRe contains 2,954 reconstructions for 1,862 CMEs. Of these, 511 CMEs contain multiple reconstructions from different catalogs. Using the best‐constrained values for each CME, we find that the combined catalog reproduces the generally known solar cycle trends. We determine the typical difference we would expect between two independent reconstructions of the same event and find values of 4.0° in the latitude, 8.0° in the longitude, 24.0° in the tilt, 9.3° in the angular width, 0.1 in the shape parameter κ, 115 km/s in the velocity, and 2.5 × 1015 g in the mass. These remain the most probable values over the solar cycle, though we find more extreme outliers in the deviation toward solar maximum.
format Article
id doaj-art-5d04f28180aa48a8b13745a09abb290b
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-5d04f28180aa48a8b13745a09abb290b2025-01-14T16:26:56ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902024-01-01221n/an/a10.1029/2023SW003796Collection, Collation, and Comparison of 3D Coronal CME ReconstructionsC. Kay0E. Palmerio1Heliophysics Science Division NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USAPredictive Science Inc. San Diego CA USAAbstract Predicting the impacts of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is a major focus of current space weather forecasting efforts. Typically, CME properties are reconstructed from stereoscopic coronal images and then used to forward model a CME's interplanetary evolution. Knowing the uncertainty in the coronal reconstructions is then a critical factor in determining the uncertainty of any predictions. A growing number of catalogs of coronal CME reconstructions exist, but no extensive comparison between these catalogs has yet been performed. Here we develop a Living List of Attributes Measured in Any Coronal Reconstruction (LLAMACoRe), an online collection of individual catalogs, which we intend to continually update. In this first version, we use results from 24 different catalogs with 3D reconstructions using Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory observations between 2007 and 2014. We have collated the individual catalogs, determining which reconstructions correspond to the same events. LLAMACoRe contains 2,954 reconstructions for 1,862 CMEs. Of these, 511 CMEs contain multiple reconstructions from different catalogs. Using the best‐constrained values for each CME, we find that the combined catalog reproduces the generally known solar cycle trends. We determine the typical difference we would expect between two independent reconstructions of the same event and find values of 4.0° in the latitude, 8.0° in the longitude, 24.0° in the tilt, 9.3° in the angular width, 0.1 in the shape parameter κ, 115 km/s in the velocity, and 2.5 × 1015 g in the mass. These remain the most probable values over the solar cycle, though we find more extreme outliers in the deviation toward solar maximum.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003796CMEsreconstructioncatalog
spellingShingle C. Kay
E. Palmerio
Collection, Collation, and Comparison of 3D Coronal CME Reconstructions
Space Weather
CMEs
reconstruction
catalog
title Collection, Collation, and Comparison of 3D Coronal CME Reconstructions
title_full Collection, Collation, and Comparison of 3D Coronal CME Reconstructions
title_fullStr Collection, Collation, and Comparison of 3D Coronal CME Reconstructions
title_full_unstemmed Collection, Collation, and Comparison of 3D Coronal CME Reconstructions
title_short Collection, Collation, and Comparison of 3D Coronal CME Reconstructions
title_sort collection collation and comparison of 3d coronal cme reconstructions
topic CMEs
reconstruction
catalog
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003796
work_keys_str_mv AT ckay collectioncollationandcomparisonof3dcoronalcmereconstructions
AT epalmerio collectioncollationandcomparisonof3dcoronalcmereconstructions