ChatGPT and human dietitian responses to diet-related questions on an online Q&A platform: A comparative study

Background ChatGPT's potential as a diet information tool is emerging. However, little is known about the extent to which the information provided by ChatGPT aligns with that provided by dietitians. Objective This study aimed to assess ChatGPT's capacity to provide responses to diet-relate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seul Ki Choi, Yunseo Moon, Hyunggu Jung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-08-01
Series:Digital Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251361381
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849230157239287808
author Seul Ki Choi
Yunseo Moon
Hyunggu Jung
author_facet Seul Ki Choi
Yunseo Moon
Hyunggu Jung
author_sort Seul Ki Choi
collection DOAJ
description Background ChatGPT's potential as a diet information tool is emerging. However, little is known about the extent to which the information provided by ChatGPT aligns with that provided by dietitians. Objective This study aimed to assess ChatGPT's capacity to provide responses to diet-related questions, compared to responses by dietitians. Methods A total of 928 diet-related questions and corresponding responses from dietitians were collected from Naver Knowledge-iN, a Korean online Q&A platform, between January 18, 2023, and January 17, 2024. ChatGPT-4o was used to generate responses to the same questions. Five text similarity indices—Dice Coefficient, Jaccard Index, Overlap Coefficient, Cosine Similarity, and Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency—were used to assess the similarity between ChatGPT's and dietitians’ responses. Questions with the top 5% response similarity were reviewed to identify characteristics of the questions for which ChatGPT generated responses similar to those of dietitians. Responses with the bottom 5% similarity were reviewed to identify reasons for the low similarity. Results The average similarity coefficient between ChatGPT and dietitian responses was 0.42. Questions with high response similarity tended to include detailed information, such as specific food items or portions (76.1%), the questioner's context (69.6%), or personal characteristics (17.4%). Low response similarity was mainly due to ChatGPT providing significantly longer responses than dietitians. Conclusions ChatGPT demonstrated content similarity to dietitian responses, but they were not identical. The development of prompt engineering techniques to enhance ChatGPT's ability to provide more expert-like and personalized information could benefit users seeking dietary information.
format Article
id doaj-art-5cfe7fd7b4424df6bf6b2e87eaa32522
institution Kabale University
issn 2055-2076
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Digital Health
spelling doaj-art-5cfe7fd7b4424df6bf6b2e87eaa325222025-08-21T10:04:37ZengSAGE PublishingDigital Health2055-20762025-08-011110.1177/20552076251361381ChatGPT and human dietitian responses to diet-related questions on an online Q&A platform: A comparative studySeul Ki Choi0Yunseo Moon1Hyunggu Jung2 Graduate School of Urban Public Health, , Seoul, Republic of Korea Department of Computer Science and Engineering, , Seoul, Republic of Korea The Research Institute of Nursing Science, , Seoul, Republic of KoreaBackground ChatGPT's potential as a diet information tool is emerging. However, little is known about the extent to which the information provided by ChatGPT aligns with that provided by dietitians. Objective This study aimed to assess ChatGPT's capacity to provide responses to diet-related questions, compared to responses by dietitians. Methods A total of 928 diet-related questions and corresponding responses from dietitians were collected from Naver Knowledge-iN, a Korean online Q&A platform, between January 18, 2023, and January 17, 2024. ChatGPT-4o was used to generate responses to the same questions. Five text similarity indices—Dice Coefficient, Jaccard Index, Overlap Coefficient, Cosine Similarity, and Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency—were used to assess the similarity between ChatGPT's and dietitians’ responses. Questions with the top 5% response similarity were reviewed to identify characteristics of the questions for which ChatGPT generated responses similar to those of dietitians. Responses with the bottom 5% similarity were reviewed to identify reasons for the low similarity. Results The average similarity coefficient between ChatGPT and dietitian responses was 0.42. Questions with high response similarity tended to include detailed information, such as specific food items or portions (76.1%), the questioner's context (69.6%), or personal characteristics (17.4%). Low response similarity was mainly due to ChatGPT providing significantly longer responses than dietitians. Conclusions ChatGPT demonstrated content similarity to dietitian responses, but they were not identical. The development of prompt engineering techniques to enhance ChatGPT's ability to provide more expert-like and personalized information could benefit users seeking dietary information.https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251361381
spellingShingle Seul Ki Choi
Yunseo Moon
Hyunggu Jung
ChatGPT and human dietitian responses to diet-related questions on an online Q&A platform: A comparative study
Digital Health
title ChatGPT and human dietitian responses to diet-related questions on an online Q&A platform: A comparative study
title_full ChatGPT and human dietitian responses to diet-related questions on an online Q&A platform: A comparative study
title_fullStr ChatGPT and human dietitian responses to diet-related questions on an online Q&A platform: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed ChatGPT and human dietitian responses to diet-related questions on an online Q&A platform: A comparative study
title_short ChatGPT and human dietitian responses to diet-related questions on an online Q&A platform: A comparative study
title_sort chatgpt and human dietitian responses to diet related questions on an online q a platform a comparative study
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251361381
work_keys_str_mv AT seulkichoi chatgptandhumandietitianresponsestodietrelatedquestionsonanonlineqaplatformacomparativestudy
AT yunseomoon chatgptandhumandietitianresponsestodietrelatedquestionsonanonlineqaplatformacomparativestudy
AT hyunggujung chatgptandhumandietitianresponsestodietrelatedquestionsonanonlineqaplatformacomparativestudy