Sweet taste preference on snack choice, added sugars intake, and diet quality– a pilot study

Abstract Humans seek to eat what is palatable, especially when snacking. Theoretically, a person who enjoys sweet taste more may choose snacks with higher sugar and calories, leading to lower overall diet quality, yet individual eating behavior traits may interfere with this relationship. We investi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faye Guarneri, Liz Cortes, Caren Ghali, Janel Clovis, Enrique R. Pouget, Stephanie Hunter, May M. Cheung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:BMC Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01076-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849726022000312320
author Faye Guarneri
Liz Cortes
Caren Ghali
Janel Clovis
Enrique R. Pouget
Stephanie Hunter
May M. Cheung
author_facet Faye Guarneri
Liz Cortes
Caren Ghali
Janel Clovis
Enrique R. Pouget
Stephanie Hunter
May M. Cheung
author_sort Faye Guarneri
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Humans seek to eat what is palatable, especially when snacking. Theoretically, a person who enjoys sweet taste more may choose snacks with higher sugar and calories, leading to lower overall diet quality, yet individual eating behavior traits may interfere with this relationship. We investigated the influences of sweet taste preference (assessed using a forced-choice paired-comparison method) and eating behaviors (i.e., uncontrolled eating, emotional eating, and cognitive restraint using the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire–R18) on diet quality and added sugars intake (validated short Healthy Eating Index survey) in 65 adults (23.0 ± 5.5 years). Participants were divided into sweet dislike, moderate sweet liker, and extreme sweet liker groups by preferred sucrose concentration tertiles. Most participants selected a low-calorie, high-sweetness snack, and neither sweet preference nor eating behavior traits were associated with snack choice. Compared to extreme sweet likers, sweet dislikers and moderate sweet likers had a lower added sugars intake, F(2, 62) = 7.32, p = 0.001, and better diet quality, F(2, 62) = 4.06, p = 0.02. Preferred sucrose concentration correlated only with higher added sugars intake (r = 0.49, p < 0.001) and lower diet quality (r = -0.27, p = 0.03) but not with the intake of other food groups. Higher sweet preference increased the odds of consuming medium (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 0.32, 6.08) and high (OR = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.85, 7.86) amounts of added sugars. Adding other covariates did not improve the statistical model. Interestingly, only sweet preference, but not added sugars intake and eating behaviors, was associated with diet quality. Thus, our data suggest that sweet preference may have a stronger influence on added sugars intake and diet quality compared to eating behaviors, although these findings should be replicated in other populations and with a larger sample size. Future studies may also assess liking for other sensory qualities (e.g., fat liking) to understand the contributions of taste preference to nutrient intake and diet quality.
format Article
id doaj-art-5cec913c07b04b30853bedce68c9ded0
institution DOAJ
issn 2055-0928
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Nutrition
spelling doaj-art-5cec913c07b04b30853bedce68c9ded02025-08-20T03:10:18ZengBMCBMC Nutrition2055-09282025-05-0111111410.1186/s40795-025-01076-4Sweet taste preference on snack choice, added sugars intake, and diet quality– a pilot studyFaye Guarneri0Liz Cortes1Caren Ghali2Janel Clovis3Enrique R. Pouget4Stephanie Hunter5May M. Cheung6Department of Health and Nutrition Sciences, City University of New York, Brooklyn CollegeDepartment of Health and Nutrition Sciences, City University of New York, Brooklyn CollegeDepartment of Health and Nutrition Sciences, City University of New York, Brooklyn CollegeDepartment of Health and Nutrition Sciences, City University of New York, Brooklyn CollegeDepartment of Health and Nutrition Sciences, City University of New York, Brooklyn CollegeMonell Chemical Senses CenterDepartment of Health and Nutrition Sciences, City University of New York, Brooklyn CollegeAbstract Humans seek to eat what is palatable, especially when snacking. Theoretically, a person who enjoys sweet taste more may choose snacks with higher sugar and calories, leading to lower overall diet quality, yet individual eating behavior traits may interfere with this relationship. We investigated the influences of sweet taste preference (assessed using a forced-choice paired-comparison method) and eating behaviors (i.e., uncontrolled eating, emotional eating, and cognitive restraint using the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire–R18) on diet quality and added sugars intake (validated short Healthy Eating Index survey) in 65 adults (23.0 ± 5.5 years). Participants were divided into sweet dislike, moderate sweet liker, and extreme sweet liker groups by preferred sucrose concentration tertiles. Most participants selected a low-calorie, high-sweetness snack, and neither sweet preference nor eating behavior traits were associated with snack choice. Compared to extreme sweet likers, sweet dislikers and moderate sweet likers had a lower added sugars intake, F(2, 62) = 7.32, p = 0.001, and better diet quality, F(2, 62) = 4.06, p = 0.02. Preferred sucrose concentration correlated only with higher added sugars intake (r = 0.49, p < 0.001) and lower diet quality (r = -0.27, p = 0.03) but not with the intake of other food groups. Higher sweet preference increased the odds of consuming medium (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 0.32, 6.08) and high (OR = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.85, 7.86) amounts of added sugars. Adding other covariates did not improve the statistical model. Interestingly, only sweet preference, but not added sugars intake and eating behaviors, was associated with diet quality. Thus, our data suggest that sweet preference may have a stronger influence on added sugars intake and diet quality compared to eating behaviors, although these findings should be replicated in other populations and with a larger sample size. Future studies may also assess liking for other sensory qualities (e.g., fat liking) to understand the contributions of taste preference to nutrient intake and diet quality.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01076-4SweetSugarTaste preferenceDiet qualityHealth eating indexSnacks
spellingShingle Faye Guarneri
Liz Cortes
Caren Ghali
Janel Clovis
Enrique R. Pouget
Stephanie Hunter
May M. Cheung
Sweet taste preference on snack choice, added sugars intake, and diet quality– a pilot study
BMC Nutrition
Sweet
Sugar
Taste preference
Diet quality
Health eating index
Snacks
title Sweet taste preference on snack choice, added sugars intake, and diet quality– a pilot study
title_full Sweet taste preference on snack choice, added sugars intake, and diet quality– a pilot study
title_fullStr Sweet taste preference on snack choice, added sugars intake, and diet quality– a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Sweet taste preference on snack choice, added sugars intake, and diet quality– a pilot study
title_short Sweet taste preference on snack choice, added sugars intake, and diet quality– a pilot study
title_sort sweet taste preference on snack choice added sugars intake and diet quality a pilot study
topic Sweet
Sugar
Taste preference
Diet quality
Health eating index
Snacks
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01076-4
work_keys_str_mv AT fayeguarneri sweettastepreferenceonsnackchoiceaddedsugarsintakeanddietqualityapilotstudy
AT lizcortes sweettastepreferenceonsnackchoiceaddedsugarsintakeanddietqualityapilotstudy
AT carenghali sweettastepreferenceonsnackchoiceaddedsugarsintakeanddietqualityapilotstudy
AT janelclovis sweettastepreferenceonsnackchoiceaddedsugarsintakeanddietqualityapilotstudy
AT enriquerpouget sweettastepreferenceonsnackchoiceaddedsugarsintakeanddietqualityapilotstudy
AT stephaniehunter sweettastepreferenceonsnackchoiceaddedsugarsintakeanddietqualityapilotstudy
AT maymcheung sweettastepreferenceonsnackchoiceaddedsugarsintakeanddietqualityapilotstudy