Comparing Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Hippocampus-sparing Whole-brain Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation
Aim: Critical technical issues related to contouring and treatment planning arise while trying to protect the hippocampus (HC) from radiation during cranial irradiation. In this article, we present our preliminary results from treating patients with brain metastases using whole-brain radiation with...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_23_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849703459643719680 |
|---|---|
| author | Soumya Roy Anirban Halder Saumen Basu Suman Joardar |
| author_facet | Soumya Roy Anirban Halder Saumen Basu Suman Joardar |
| author_sort | Soumya Roy |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim:
Critical technical issues related to contouring and treatment planning arise while trying to protect the hippocampus (HC) from radiation during cranial irradiation. In this article, we present our preliminary results from treating patients with brain metastases using whole-brain radiation with HC sparing.
Methods:
Twelve patients previously treated with whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing were included in this retrospective study. The HC was contoured, and hippocampal avoidance regions were created using a 5-mm volumetric expansion around the HC. A total of 24 linear accelerator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were generated for a prescription dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions.
Results and Discussion:
On average, the hippocampal avoidance volume was 17 cm3, occupying 1.32% of the whole-brain planned target volume. VMAT spared the HC, with a median dose of 16.6 Gy and a maximum dose of 23.5 Gy. IMRT spared the HC, with a median dose of 17.7 Gy and a maximum dose of 19.5 Gy. On a per-fraction basis, the mean dose to the HC was reduced by 55% to 16.28 Gy using VMAT and by 59% to 17.83 Gy using IMRT. Target coverage and homogeneity were acceptable with both IMRT and VMAT modalities. No statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference was found with different modalities in target coverage.
Conclusions:
Modern IMRT/VMAT techniques allow for the sparing of the HC with acceptable target coverage and homogeneity. Our novel use of gantry, collimator, and couch orientations allowed the plan to satisfy RTOG 0933 specified criteria. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5cd68acbc77e43dab235e7b3ee826195 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2588-9273 2468-9203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-5cd68acbc77e43dab235e7b3ee8261952025-08-20T03:17:17ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Radiation and Cancer Research2588-92732468-92032025-04-01162647010.4103/jrcr.jrcr_23_24Comparing Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Hippocampus-sparing Whole-brain Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric EvaluationSoumya RoyAnirban HalderSaumen BasuSuman JoardarAim: Critical technical issues related to contouring and treatment planning arise while trying to protect the hippocampus (HC) from radiation during cranial irradiation. In this article, we present our preliminary results from treating patients with brain metastases using whole-brain radiation with HC sparing. Methods: Twelve patients previously treated with whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing were included in this retrospective study. The HC was contoured, and hippocampal avoidance regions were created using a 5-mm volumetric expansion around the HC. A total of 24 linear accelerator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were generated for a prescription dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Results and Discussion: On average, the hippocampal avoidance volume was 17 cm3, occupying 1.32% of the whole-brain planned target volume. VMAT spared the HC, with a median dose of 16.6 Gy and a maximum dose of 23.5 Gy. IMRT spared the HC, with a median dose of 17.7 Gy and a maximum dose of 19.5 Gy. On a per-fraction basis, the mean dose to the HC was reduced by 55% to 16.28 Gy using VMAT and by 59% to 17.83 Gy using IMRT. Target coverage and homogeneity were acceptable with both IMRT and VMAT modalities. No statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference was found with different modalities in target coverage. Conclusions: Modern IMRT/VMAT techniques allow for the sparing of the HC with acceptable target coverage and homogeneity. Our novel use of gantry, collimator, and couch orientations allowed the plan to satisfy RTOG 0933 specified criteria.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_23_24hippocampal sparingintensity-modulated radiotherapyrtog 0933volumetric-modulated arc therapywhole-brain radiotherapy |
| spellingShingle | Soumya Roy Anirban Halder Saumen Basu Suman Joardar Comparing Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Hippocampus-sparing Whole-brain Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research hippocampal sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy rtog 0933 volumetric-modulated arc therapy whole-brain radiotherapy |
| title | Comparing Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Hippocampus-sparing Whole-brain Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation |
| title_full | Comparing Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Hippocampus-sparing Whole-brain Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation |
| title_fullStr | Comparing Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Hippocampus-sparing Whole-brain Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Hippocampus-sparing Whole-brain Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation |
| title_short | Comparing Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Hippocampus-sparing Whole-brain Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation |
| title_sort | comparing volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy for hippocampus sparing whole brain radiotherapy a dosimetric evaluation |
| topic | hippocampal sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy rtog 0933 volumetric-modulated arc therapy whole-brain radiotherapy |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_23_24 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT soumyaroy comparingvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyandintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforhippocampussparingwholebrainradiotherapyadosimetricevaluation AT anirbanhalder comparingvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyandintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforhippocampussparingwholebrainradiotherapyadosimetricevaluation AT saumenbasu comparingvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyandintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforhippocampussparingwholebrainradiotherapyadosimetricevaluation AT sumanjoardar comparingvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyandintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyforhippocampussparingwholebrainradiotherapyadosimetricevaluation |