Choosing the Optimal Global Digital Elevation Model for Stream Network Delineation: Beyond Vertical Accuracy
Abstract Satellite‐derived global digital elevation models (DEMs) are essential for providing the topographic information needed in a wide range of hydrological applications. However, their use is limited by spatial resolution and vertical bias due to sensor limitations in observing bare terrain. Si...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Earth and Space Science |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EA003743 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849686303195529216 |
|---|---|
| author | Jana Marešová Petr Bašta Kateřina Gdulová Vojtěch Barták Giorgi Kozhoridze Jiri Šmída Yannis Markonis Duccio Rocchini Jiří Prošek Petra Pracná Vítězslav Moudrý |
| author_facet | Jana Marešová Petr Bašta Kateřina Gdulová Vojtěch Barták Giorgi Kozhoridze Jiri Šmída Yannis Markonis Duccio Rocchini Jiří Prošek Petra Pracná Vítězslav Moudrý |
| author_sort | Jana Marešová |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Satellite‐derived global digital elevation models (DEMs) are essential for providing the topographic information needed in a wide range of hydrological applications. However, their use is limited by spatial resolution and vertical bias due to sensor limitations in observing bare terrain. Significant efforts have been made to improve the resolution of global DEMs (e.g., TanDEM‐X) and create bare‐earth DEMs (e.g., FABDEM, MERIT, CEDTM). We evaluated the vertical accuracy of bare‐earth and global DEMs in Central European mountains and submontane regions, and assessed how DEM resolution, vegetation offset removal, land cover, and terrain slope affect stream network delineation. Using lidar‐derived DTM and national stream networks as references, we found that: (a) bare‐earth DEMs outperform global DEMs across all land cover types. RMSEs increased with increasing slope for all DEMs in non‐forest areas. In forests, however, the negative effect of the slope was outweighed by the vegetation offset even for bare‐earth DTMs; (b) the accuracy of derived stream networks was affected by terrain slope and land cover more than by the vertical accuracy of DEMs. Stream network delineation performed poorly in non‐forest areas and relatively well in forests. Increasing slope improved the streams delineation performance; (c) using DEMs with higher resolution (e.g., 12 m TanDEM‐X) improved stream network delineation, but increasing resolution also increased the need for effective vegetation bias removal. Our results indicate that vertical accuracy alone does not reflect how well DEMs perform in stream network delineation. This underscores the need to include stream network performance in DEM quality rankings. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5cd1c0135f654fc0975a8e4e73f8d2e2 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2333-5084 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | American Geophysical Union (AGU) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Earth and Space Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-5cd1c0135f654fc0975a8e4e73f8d2e22025-08-20T03:22:45ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth and Space Science2333-50842024-12-011112n/an/a10.1029/2024EA003743Choosing the Optimal Global Digital Elevation Model for Stream Network Delineation: Beyond Vertical AccuracyJana Marešová0Petr Bašta1Kateřina Gdulová2Vojtěch Barták3Giorgi Kozhoridze4Jiri Šmída5Yannis Markonis6Duccio Rocchini7Jiří Prošek8Petra Pracná9Vítězslav Moudrý10Department of Spatial Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha ‐ Suchdol Czech RepublicDepartment of Spatial Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha ‐ Suchdol Czech RepublicDepartment of Spatial Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha ‐ Suchdol Czech RepublicDepartment of Spatial Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha ‐ Suchdol Czech RepublicDepartment of Spatial Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha ‐ Suchdol Czech RepublicDepartment of Geoinformatics and Didactics of Informatics Faculty of Science Humanities and Education Technical University Liberec Liberec Czech RepublicDepartment of Water Resources and Environmental Modeling Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha ‐ Suchdol Czech RepublicDepartment of Spatial Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha ‐ Suchdol Czech RepublicDepartment of Spatial Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha ‐ Suchdol Czech RepublicDepartment of Spatial Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha ‐ Suchdol Czech RepublicDepartment of Spatial Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha ‐ Suchdol Czech RepublicAbstract Satellite‐derived global digital elevation models (DEMs) are essential for providing the topographic information needed in a wide range of hydrological applications. However, their use is limited by spatial resolution and vertical bias due to sensor limitations in observing bare terrain. Significant efforts have been made to improve the resolution of global DEMs (e.g., TanDEM‐X) and create bare‐earth DEMs (e.g., FABDEM, MERIT, CEDTM). We evaluated the vertical accuracy of bare‐earth and global DEMs in Central European mountains and submontane regions, and assessed how DEM resolution, vegetation offset removal, land cover, and terrain slope affect stream network delineation. Using lidar‐derived DTM and national stream networks as references, we found that: (a) bare‐earth DEMs outperform global DEMs across all land cover types. RMSEs increased with increasing slope for all DEMs in non‐forest areas. In forests, however, the negative effect of the slope was outweighed by the vegetation offset even for bare‐earth DTMs; (b) the accuracy of derived stream networks was affected by terrain slope and land cover more than by the vertical accuracy of DEMs. Stream network delineation performed poorly in non‐forest areas and relatively well in forests. Increasing slope improved the streams delineation performance; (c) using DEMs with higher resolution (e.g., 12 m TanDEM‐X) improved stream network delineation, but increasing resolution also increased the need for effective vegetation bias removal. Our results indicate that vertical accuracy alone does not reflect how well DEMs perform in stream network delineation. This underscores the need to include stream network performance in DEM quality rankings.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EA003743DEMDEM accuracystream network delineation |
| spellingShingle | Jana Marešová Petr Bašta Kateřina Gdulová Vojtěch Barták Giorgi Kozhoridze Jiri Šmída Yannis Markonis Duccio Rocchini Jiří Prošek Petra Pracná Vítězslav Moudrý Choosing the Optimal Global Digital Elevation Model for Stream Network Delineation: Beyond Vertical Accuracy Earth and Space Science DEM DEM accuracy stream network delineation |
| title | Choosing the Optimal Global Digital Elevation Model for Stream Network Delineation: Beyond Vertical Accuracy |
| title_full | Choosing the Optimal Global Digital Elevation Model for Stream Network Delineation: Beyond Vertical Accuracy |
| title_fullStr | Choosing the Optimal Global Digital Elevation Model for Stream Network Delineation: Beyond Vertical Accuracy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Choosing the Optimal Global Digital Elevation Model for Stream Network Delineation: Beyond Vertical Accuracy |
| title_short | Choosing the Optimal Global Digital Elevation Model for Stream Network Delineation: Beyond Vertical Accuracy |
| title_sort | choosing the optimal global digital elevation model for stream network delineation beyond vertical accuracy |
| topic | DEM DEM accuracy stream network delineation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EA003743 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT janamaresova choosingtheoptimalglobaldigitalelevationmodelforstreamnetworkdelineationbeyondverticalaccuracy AT petrbasta choosingtheoptimalglobaldigitalelevationmodelforstreamnetworkdelineationbeyondverticalaccuracy AT katerinagdulova choosingtheoptimalglobaldigitalelevationmodelforstreamnetworkdelineationbeyondverticalaccuracy AT vojtechbartak choosingtheoptimalglobaldigitalelevationmodelforstreamnetworkdelineationbeyondverticalaccuracy AT giorgikozhoridze choosingtheoptimalglobaldigitalelevationmodelforstreamnetworkdelineationbeyondverticalaccuracy AT jirismida choosingtheoptimalglobaldigitalelevationmodelforstreamnetworkdelineationbeyondverticalaccuracy AT yannismarkonis choosingtheoptimalglobaldigitalelevationmodelforstreamnetworkdelineationbeyondverticalaccuracy AT ducciorocchini choosingtheoptimalglobaldigitalelevationmodelforstreamnetworkdelineationbeyondverticalaccuracy AT jiriprosek choosingtheoptimalglobaldigitalelevationmodelforstreamnetworkdelineationbeyondverticalaccuracy AT petrapracna choosingtheoptimalglobaldigitalelevationmodelforstreamnetworkdelineationbeyondverticalaccuracy AT vitezslavmoudry choosingtheoptimalglobaldigitalelevationmodelforstreamnetworkdelineationbeyondverticalaccuracy |