Misreading or living in denial? Reindeer overstocking and long‐term effects on vegetation: An experimental approach

Abstract In an era marked by accelerating climate change, habitat loss, and shifting land use patterns, it is crucial to understand the intricate effects of multiple stressors on ecosystems. This long‐term study sheds light on the complex interplay between grazing and habitat characteristics on past...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bård‐Jørgen Bårdsen, Hans Tømmervik, Marius Warg Næss, Jarle Werner Bjerke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-02-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70174
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850078927012233216
author Bård‐Jørgen Bårdsen
Hans Tømmervik
Marius Warg Næss
Jarle Werner Bjerke
author_facet Bård‐Jørgen Bårdsen
Hans Tømmervik
Marius Warg Næss
Jarle Werner Bjerke
author_sort Bård‐Jørgen Bårdsen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In an era marked by accelerating climate change, habitat loss, and shifting land use patterns, it is crucial to understand the intricate effects of multiple stressors on ecosystems. This long‐term study sheds light on the complex interplay between grazing and habitat characteristics on pasture dynamics and offers insights into how various stressors affect ecosystems facing environmental challenges. Our experimental study documents that manipulation in restricting reindeer grazing and trampling through fencing led to higher ground‐lichen biomass, volume, height (particularly in one habitat), and cover compared with open‐control plots. The effect of fencing varied depending on habitat, and for lichen biomass, volume, and height, the lowest values were observed in windswept exposed ridges and mountain heaths (exposed/mountain), and the highest values were observed in forested and leeward‐heath (forest/leeward) habitat. The average (past five years) number of reindeer per square kilometer had indirect effects that varied across habitats. We observed negative density dependence in the open plots for height in the exposed/mountain habitats. Fencing reduced this effect, which was also valid for biomass except that habitat did not affect the effect of density. Surprisingly, in the forest/leeward areas, the estimated effects of reindeer density on biomass, volume, and height were positive for the fenced plots. Negative density dependence was evident for lichen cover irrespective of habitats and manipulation, even though this effect had little biological significance, whereas cover at the initiation of the experiment positively affected later recordings (particularly for the controls). Our models showed high explanatory power, highlighting the significance of reindeer density and habitat as predictors of ground‐lichen dynamics. Overall, negative density‐dependent effects were observed in the open plots in the most exposed areas, and fencing mitigated the negative impact of reindeer on lichens, particularly in less exposed areas. We challenge the “equilibrium” and “nonequilibrium” frameworks for explaining livestock‐pasture dynamics. We propose future studies to estimate the relative importance of density‐dependent and density‐independent factors, such as climate, using models considering both mechanisms simultaneously.
format Article
id doaj-art-5ccbe649f8714026a9fa8bed4792d8c4
institution DOAJ
issn 2150-8925
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj-art-5ccbe649f8714026a9fa8bed4792d8c42025-08-20T02:45:24ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252025-02-01162n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.70174Misreading or living in denial? Reindeer overstocking and long‐term effects on vegetation: An experimental approachBård‐Jørgen Bårdsen0Hans Tømmervik1Marius Warg Næss2Jarle Werner Bjerke3Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Arctic Ecology Department, Fram Centre Tromsø NorwayNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Arctic Ecology Department, Fram Centre Tromsø NorwayNorwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research (NIKU) High North Department, Fram Centre Tromsø NorwayNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Arctic Ecology Department, Fram Centre Tromsø NorwayAbstract In an era marked by accelerating climate change, habitat loss, and shifting land use patterns, it is crucial to understand the intricate effects of multiple stressors on ecosystems. This long‐term study sheds light on the complex interplay between grazing and habitat characteristics on pasture dynamics and offers insights into how various stressors affect ecosystems facing environmental challenges. Our experimental study documents that manipulation in restricting reindeer grazing and trampling through fencing led to higher ground‐lichen biomass, volume, height (particularly in one habitat), and cover compared with open‐control plots. The effect of fencing varied depending on habitat, and for lichen biomass, volume, and height, the lowest values were observed in windswept exposed ridges and mountain heaths (exposed/mountain), and the highest values were observed in forested and leeward‐heath (forest/leeward) habitat. The average (past five years) number of reindeer per square kilometer had indirect effects that varied across habitats. We observed negative density dependence in the open plots for height in the exposed/mountain habitats. Fencing reduced this effect, which was also valid for biomass except that habitat did not affect the effect of density. Surprisingly, in the forest/leeward areas, the estimated effects of reindeer density on biomass, volume, and height were positive for the fenced plots. Negative density dependence was evident for lichen cover irrespective of habitats and manipulation, even though this effect had little biological significance, whereas cover at the initiation of the experiment positively affected later recordings (particularly for the controls). Our models showed high explanatory power, highlighting the significance of reindeer density and habitat as predictors of ground‐lichen dynamics. Overall, negative density‐dependent effects were observed in the open plots in the most exposed areas, and fencing mitigated the negative impact of reindeer on lichens, particularly in less exposed areas. We challenge the “equilibrium” and “nonequilibrium” frameworks for explaining livestock‐pasture dynamics. We propose future studies to estimate the relative importance of density‐dependent and density‐independent factors, such as climate, using models considering both mechanisms simultaneously.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70174Arctic/SubArcticdisequilibriumenvironmental unpredictabilityovergrazingpastoral livelihoodpopulation dynamics
spellingShingle Bård‐Jørgen Bårdsen
Hans Tømmervik
Marius Warg Næss
Jarle Werner Bjerke
Misreading or living in denial? Reindeer overstocking and long‐term effects on vegetation: An experimental approach
Ecosphere
Arctic/SubArctic
disequilibrium
environmental unpredictability
overgrazing
pastoral livelihood
population dynamics
title Misreading or living in denial? Reindeer overstocking and long‐term effects on vegetation: An experimental approach
title_full Misreading or living in denial? Reindeer overstocking and long‐term effects on vegetation: An experimental approach
title_fullStr Misreading or living in denial? Reindeer overstocking and long‐term effects on vegetation: An experimental approach
title_full_unstemmed Misreading or living in denial? Reindeer overstocking and long‐term effects on vegetation: An experimental approach
title_short Misreading or living in denial? Reindeer overstocking and long‐term effects on vegetation: An experimental approach
title_sort misreading or living in denial reindeer overstocking and long term effects on vegetation an experimental approach
topic Arctic/SubArctic
disequilibrium
environmental unpredictability
overgrazing
pastoral livelihood
population dynamics
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70174
work_keys_str_mv AT bardjørgenbardsen misreadingorlivingindenialreindeeroverstockingandlongtermeffectsonvegetationanexperimentalapproach
AT hanstømmervik misreadingorlivingindenialreindeeroverstockingandlongtermeffectsonvegetationanexperimentalapproach
AT mariuswargnæss misreadingorlivingindenialreindeeroverstockingandlongtermeffectsonvegetationanexperimentalapproach
AT jarlewernerbjerke misreadingorlivingindenialreindeeroverstockingandlongtermeffectsonvegetationanexperimentalapproach