Comparative Use of Soil Organic and Inorganic Amendments in Heavy Metals Stabilization

Remediation strategies are capable to mitigate negative effects of heavy metals (HMs) on soils. The distribution of cooper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and chromium (Cr) was evaluated in a contaminated soil after adding biosolid compost (BC) and phosphate fertilizer (PF). A greenhouse assay and sequential extra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agustina Branzini, Marta Susana Zubillaga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Applied and Environmental Soil Science
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/721032
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849413046788685824
author Agustina Branzini
Marta Susana Zubillaga
author_facet Agustina Branzini
Marta Susana Zubillaga
author_sort Agustina Branzini
collection DOAJ
description Remediation strategies are capable to mitigate negative effects of heavy metals (HMs) on soils. The distribution of cooper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and chromium (Cr) was evaluated in a contaminated soil after adding biosolid compost (BC) and phosphate fertilizer (PF). A greenhouse assay and sequential extraction procedure were performed to determine the fractionation of HM in contaminated and remediated soil. In BC treatment, among 4 to 6% of Cu was associated with soil humic substances. Without amendments and with fertilizer application, Zn solubility increased by 15.4 and 8.4%, respectively, with experiment time. Although Cr was significantly adsorbed to the inorganic fraction, with compost application there was a transfer to organic fraction. A single amendment application is not suitable for immobilizing all metals of concern, because there are diverse union’s behaviors between HM and soil matrix. As the organic matter and phosphate fertilizer were effective in reducing mobility of Cu, the organic matter was more effective in the immobilization of Cr, and inorganic amendment induced the Zn precipitation, results from this pilot study suggest a combined use of these two amendments for soil remediation strategies. However, liming may be further needed to prevent soil acidification on longer time scales. Also, we propose the use of chemical and biological remediation strategies for potential improvement of effectiveness.
format Article
id doaj-art-5ca0fc48b16646dd8c758e22bb12a6ef
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-7667
1687-7675
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Applied and Environmental Soil Science
spelling doaj-art-5ca0fc48b16646dd8c758e22bb12a6ef2025-08-20T03:34:14ZengWileyApplied and Environmental Soil Science1687-76671687-76752012-01-01201210.1155/2012/721032721032Comparative Use of Soil Organic and Inorganic Amendments in Heavy Metals StabilizationAgustina Branzini0Marta Susana Zubillaga1Department of Fertility and Fertilizers, University of Buenos Aires, Avenue San Martín 4453, 1417 Buenos Aires, ArgentinaDepartment of Fertility and Fertilizers, University of Buenos Aires, Avenue San Martín 4453, 1417 Buenos Aires, ArgentinaRemediation strategies are capable to mitigate negative effects of heavy metals (HMs) on soils. The distribution of cooper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and chromium (Cr) was evaluated in a contaminated soil after adding biosolid compost (BC) and phosphate fertilizer (PF). A greenhouse assay and sequential extraction procedure were performed to determine the fractionation of HM in contaminated and remediated soil. In BC treatment, among 4 to 6% of Cu was associated with soil humic substances. Without amendments and with fertilizer application, Zn solubility increased by 15.4 and 8.4%, respectively, with experiment time. Although Cr was significantly adsorbed to the inorganic fraction, with compost application there was a transfer to organic fraction. A single amendment application is not suitable for immobilizing all metals of concern, because there are diverse union’s behaviors between HM and soil matrix. As the organic matter and phosphate fertilizer were effective in reducing mobility of Cu, the organic matter was more effective in the immobilization of Cr, and inorganic amendment induced the Zn precipitation, results from this pilot study suggest a combined use of these two amendments for soil remediation strategies. However, liming may be further needed to prevent soil acidification on longer time scales. Also, we propose the use of chemical and biological remediation strategies for potential improvement of effectiveness.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/721032
spellingShingle Agustina Branzini
Marta Susana Zubillaga
Comparative Use of Soil Organic and Inorganic Amendments in Heavy Metals Stabilization
Applied and Environmental Soil Science
title Comparative Use of Soil Organic and Inorganic Amendments in Heavy Metals Stabilization
title_full Comparative Use of Soil Organic and Inorganic Amendments in Heavy Metals Stabilization
title_fullStr Comparative Use of Soil Organic and Inorganic Amendments in Heavy Metals Stabilization
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Use of Soil Organic and Inorganic Amendments in Heavy Metals Stabilization
title_short Comparative Use of Soil Organic and Inorganic Amendments in Heavy Metals Stabilization
title_sort comparative use of soil organic and inorganic amendments in heavy metals stabilization
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/721032
work_keys_str_mv AT agustinabranzini comparativeuseofsoilorganicandinorganicamendmentsinheavymetalsstabilization
AT martasusanazubillaga comparativeuseofsoilorganicandinorganicamendmentsinheavymetalsstabilization