When ChatGPT Writes Your Research Proposal: Scientific Creativity in the Age of Generative AI
Within the last years, generative artificial intelligence (AI) has not only entered the field of creativity; it might even be marking a turning point for some creative domains. This raises the question of whether AI also poses a turning point for scientific creativity, which comprises the ability to...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Intelligence |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/13/5/55 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850127056397926400 |
|---|---|
| author | Vera Eymann Thomas Lachmann Daniela Czernochowski |
| author_facet | Vera Eymann Thomas Lachmann Daniela Czernochowski |
| author_sort | Vera Eymann |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Within the last years, generative artificial intelligence (AI) has not only entered the field of creativity; it might even be marking a turning point for some creative domains. This raises the question of whether AI also poses a turning point for scientific creativity, which comprises the ability to develop new ideas or methodological approaches in science. In this study, we use a new scientific creativity task to investigate the extent to which AI—in this case, ChatGPT-4—can generate creative ideas in a scientific context. Specifically, we compare AI-generated responses with those of graduate students in terms of their ability to generate scientific hypotheses, design experiments, and justify their ideas for a fictitious research scenario in the field of experimental psychology. We asked students to write and prompted ChatGPT to generate a brief version of a research proposal containing four separate assignments (i.e., formulating a hypothesis, designing an experiment, listing the required equipment, and justifying the chosen method). Using a structured (blinded) rating, two experts from the field evaluated students’ research proposals and proposals generated by ChatGPT in terms of their scientific creativity. Our results indicate that ChatGPT received significantly higher overall scores, but even more crucially exceeded students in sub-scores measuring originality or meaningfulness of the ideas. In addition to a statistical evaluation, we qualitatively assess our data providing a more detailed report in regards to subtle differences between students’ and AI-generated responses. Lastly, we discuss challenges and provide potential future directions for the field. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5c367494bfb9455983a16bf56ed8f86d |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2079-3200 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Intelligence |
| spelling | doaj-art-5c367494bfb9455983a16bf56ed8f86d2025-08-20T02:33:47ZengMDPI AGJournal of Intelligence2079-32002025-05-011355510.3390/jintelligence13050055When ChatGPT Writes Your Research Proposal: Scientific Creativity in the Age of Generative AIVera Eymann0Thomas Lachmann1Daniela Czernochowski2Center for Cognitive Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663 Kaiserslautern, GermanyCenter for Cognitive Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663 Kaiserslautern, GermanyCenter for Cognitive Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663 Kaiserslautern, GermanyWithin the last years, generative artificial intelligence (AI) has not only entered the field of creativity; it might even be marking a turning point for some creative domains. This raises the question of whether AI also poses a turning point for scientific creativity, which comprises the ability to develop new ideas or methodological approaches in science. In this study, we use a new scientific creativity task to investigate the extent to which AI—in this case, ChatGPT-4—can generate creative ideas in a scientific context. Specifically, we compare AI-generated responses with those of graduate students in terms of their ability to generate scientific hypotheses, design experiments, and justify their ideas for a fictitious research scenario in the field of experimental psychology. We asked students to write and prompted ChatGPT to generate a brief version of a research proposal containing four separate assignments (i.e., formulating a hypothesis, designing an experiment, listing the required equipment, and justifying the chosen method). Using a structured (blinded) rating, two experts from the field evaluated students’ research proposals and proposals generated by ChatGPT in terms of their scientific creativity. Our results indicate that ChatGPT received significantly higher overall scores, but even more crucially exceeded students in sub-scores measuring originality or meaningfulness of the ideas. In addition to a statistical evaluation, we qualitatively assess our data providing a more detailed report in regards to subtle differences between students’ and AI-generated responses. Lastly, we discuss challenges and provide potential future directions for the field.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/13/5/55artificial intelligencescientific creativitycreativityintelligenceChatGPT |
| spellingShingle | Vera Eymann Thomas Lachmann Daniela Czernochowski When ChatGPT Writes Your Research Proposal: Scientific Creativity in the Age of Generative AI Journal of Intelligence artificial intelligence scientific creativity creativity intelligence ChatGPT |
| title | When ChatGPT Writes Your Research Proposal: Scientific Creativity in the Age of Generative AI |
| title_full | When ChatGPT Writes Your Research Proposal: Scientific Creativity in the Age of Generative AI |
| title_fullStr | When ChatGPT Writes Your Research Proposal: Scientific Creativity in the Age of Generative AI |
| title_full_unstemmed | When ChatGPT Writes Your Research Proposal: Scientific Creativity in the Age of Generative AI |
| title_short | When ChatGPT Writes Your Research Proposal: Scientific Creativity in the Age of Generative AI |
| title_sort | when chatgpt writes your research proposal scientific creativity in the age of generative ai |
| topic | artificial intelligence scientific creativity creativity intelligence ChatGPT |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/13/5/55 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT veraeymann whenchatgptwritesyourresearchproposalscientificcreativityintheageofgenerativeai AT thomaslachmann whenchatgptwritesyourresearchproposalscientificcreativityintheageofgenerativeai AT danielaczernochowski whenchatgptwritesyourresearchproposalscientificcreativityintheageofgenerativeai |