Ibn Sina's theory of attribute monotheism: conceptual unity or semantic unity
One of the types of monotheism is monotheism. According to the common view, monotheism refers to the attributes that all the attributes of God and His essence exist in a single existence, although they differ in terms of concepts. But Ibn Sina did not suffice with the unity of attributes and essence...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Maarej Research Institute of Revelation Sciences
2019-02-01
|
| Series: | حکمت اسرا |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hikmat.isramags.ir/article_112974_41bd779c11068fe7c6bde78fee15d635.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850100045534199808 |
|---|---|
| author | یارعلی کرد فیروزجایی |
| author_facet | یارعلی کرد فیروزجایی |
| author_sort | یارعلی کرد فیروزجایی |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | One of the types of monotheism is monotheism. According to the common view, monotheism refers to the attributes that all the attributes of God and His essence exist in a single existence, although they differ in terms of concepts. But Ibn Sina did not suffice with the unity of attributes and essence in external existence and considered them as one in terms of concept. This view requires the literal synonymy of the attributes and is rejected. The author believes that there is enough evidence in Ibn Sina's words that based on them, it can be said that the conceptual unity of essence and attributes does not necessarily mean their literal synonymy, Ibn Sina does not mean that the attributes that he carries on God They are common in their core, namely, entity and security, and this single unit of proof is the meaning of those attributes, and Ibn Sina refers to the conceptual unity of this semantic unity, not unity in the conceptual-mental approach. Given that in every adjective, in addition to the affirmative meaning of security and existence, there is a certain denial, a special addition or a special denial, and a special addition, it cannot be said that their words are synonymous, and thus the critiques of Ibn Sina's theory. There are no definite criticisms; Because Ibn Sina's theory is neither a literal synonym of attributes nor does it require it. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5c1b7e65ee854f7491b0902394fea2bc |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2383-2916 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2019-02-01 |
| publisher | Maarej Research Institute of Revelation Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | حکمت اسرا |
| spelling | doaj-art-5c1b7e65ee854f7491b0902394fea2bc2025-08-20T02:40:23ZfasMaarej Research Institute of Revelation Sciencesحکمت اسرا2383-29162019-02-011026786112974Ibn Sina's theory of attribute monotheism: conceptual unity or semantic unityیارعلی کرد فیروزجایی0معاونت پژوهشی، دانشگاه باقر العلوم علیه السلام، قم، ایرانOne of the types of monotheism is monotheism. According to the common view, monotheism refers to the attributes that all the attributes of God and His essence exist in a single existence, although they differ in terms of concepts. But Ibn Sina did not suffice with the unity of attributes and essence in external existence and considered them as one in terms of concept. This view requires the literal synonymy of the attributes and is rejected. The author believes that there is enough evidence in Ibn Sina's words that based on them, it can be said that the conceptual unity of essence and attributes does not necessarily mean their literal synonymy, Ibn Sina does not mean that the attributes that he carries on God They are common in their core, namely, entity and security, and this single unit of proof is the meaning of those attributes, and Ibn Sina refers to the conceptual unity of this semantic unity, not unity in the conceptual-mental approach. Given that in every adjective, in addition to the affirmative meaning of security and existence, there is a certain denial, a special addition or a special denial, and a special addition, it cannot be said that their words are synonymous, and thus the critiques of Ibn Sina's theory. There are no definite criticisms; Because Ibn Sina's theory is neither a literal synonym of attributes nor does it require it.https://hikmat.isramags.ir/article_112974_41bd779c11068fe7c6bde78fee15d635.pdfibn sinamonotheismmonotheism of attributestheologyattributes of god |
| spellingShingle | یارعلی کرد فیروزجایی Ibn Sina's theory of attribute monotheism: conceptual unity or semantic unity حکمت اسرا ibn sina monotheism monotheism of attributes theology attributes of god |
| title | Ibn Sina's theory of attribute monotheism: conceptual unity or semantic unity |
| title_full | Ibn Sina's theory of attribute monotheism: conceptual unity or semantic unity |
| title_fullStr | Ibn Sina's theory of attribute monotheism: conceptual unity or semantic unity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ibn Sina's theory of attribute monotheism: conceptual unity or semantic unity |
| title_short | Ibn Sina's theory of attribute monotheism: conceptual unity or semantic unity |
| title_sort | ibn sina s theory of attribute monotheism conceptual unity or semantic unity |
| topic | ibn sina monotheism monotheism of attributes theology attributes of god |
| url | https://hikmat.isramags.ir/article_112974_41bd779c11068fe7c6bde78fee15d635.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yạrʿlyḵrdfyrwzjạyy ibnsinastheoryofattributemonotheismconceptualunityorsemanticunity |