Radiation Safety in Catheterization Laboratories: Gaps in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Cardiologists – A Cross-sectional Study in Tertiary Care Cardiac Center

Background: Cardiac catheterization laboratories (Cath Labs) extensively use ionizing radiation, exposing healthcare professionals to occupational hazards. Despite established safety guidelines, significant gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding radiation protection persist, par...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Narendran, Bharath Raj Kidambi, A. C. Nagamani, K. H. Srinivas, K. S. Ravindranath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Indian College of Cardiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jicc.jicc_4_25
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850037275540324352
author D. Narendran
Bharath Raj Kidambi
A. C. Nagamani
K. H. Srinivas
K. S. Ravindranath
author_facet D. Narendran
Bharath Raj Kidambi
A. C. Nagamani
K. H. Srinivas
K. S. Ravindranath
author_sort D. Narendran
collection DOAJ
description Background: Cardiac catheterization laboratories (Cath Labs) extensively use ionizing radiation, exposing healthcare professionals to occupational hazards. Despite established safety guidelines, significant gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding radiation protection persist, particularly in developing countries. Methods: This cross-sectional study, conducted in 2024 at a tertiary cardiac care center in South India, utilized a prevalidated KAP questionnaire distributed to all Cath Lab professionals. Of those approached, 77 participants, including 49 residents and 28 consultants, responded. The survey assessed radiation safety knowledge, perceptions of occupational risks, and protective practices. Data were analyzed using SPSS v28.0, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Eighty-seven percent of participants reported no formal radiation safety training, and only 46.75% correctly identified the annual dose limit (20 mSv). Familiarity with the inverse square law was similarly low (46.75%). While 52% strongly believed radiation exposure impacts career longevity, practices were inconsistent: 36.36% never used lead eyewear, and 76.62% did not monitor cumulative exposure. Consultants demonstrated superior knowledge and compliance compared to residents, with significant differences in training and adherence. Conclusion: This study highlights substantial gaps in radiation safety KAP among Cath Lab professionals. Structured training programs, ergonomic protective equipment, and automated monitoring systems are crucial for improving compliance. Mentorship and regular audits can promote a safety-centric culture. While advancements in shielding technologies hold promise, strict adherence to existing safety protocols remains vital to protect healthcare workers and ensure procedural efficacy.
format Article
id doaj-art-5beb38fc78eb4df09e9f11505f477e88
institution DOAJ
issn 1561-8811
2213-3615
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Indian College of Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-5beb38fc78eb4df09e9f11505f477e882025-08-20T02:56:55ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian College of Cardiology1561-88112213-36152025-04-01152728010.4103/jicc.jicc_4_25Radiation Safety in Catheterization Laboratories: Gaps in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Cardiologists – A Cross-sectional Study in Tertiary Care Cardiac CenterD. NarendranBharath Raj KidambiA. C. NagamaniK. H. SrinivasK. S. RavindranathBackground: Cardiac catheterization laboratories (Cath Labs) extensively use ionizing radiation, exposing healthcare professionals to occupational hazards. Despite established safety guidelines, significant gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding radiation protection persist, particularly in developing countries. Methods: This cross-sectional study, conducted in 2024 at a tertiary cardiac care center in South India, utilized a prevalidated KAP questionnaire distributed to all Cath Lab professionals. Of those approached, 77 participants, including 49 residents and 28 consultants, responded. The survey assessed radiation safety knowledge, perceptions of occupational risks, and protective practices. Data were analyzed using SPSS v28.0, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Eighty-seven percent of participants reported no formal radiation safety training, and only 46.75% correctly identified the annual dose limit (20 mSv). Familiarity with the inverse square law was similarly low (46.75%). While 52% strongly believed radiation exposure impacts career longevity, practices were inconsistent: 36.36% never used lead eyewear, and 76.62% did not monitor cumulative exposure. Consultants demonstrated superior knowledge and compliance compared to residents, with significant differences in training and adherence. Conclusion: This study highlights substantial gaps in radiation safety KAP among Cath Lab professionals. Structured training programs, ergonomic protective equipment, and automated monitoring systems are crucial for improving compliance. Mentorship and regular audits can promote a safety-centric culture. While advancements in shielding technologies hold promise, strict adherence to existing safety protocols remains vital to protect healthcare workers and ensure procedural efficacy.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jicc.jicc_4_25catheterization laboratorydose monitoringoccupational hazardradiation safety
spellingShingle D. Narendran
Bharath Raj Kidambi
A. C. Nagamani
K. H. Srinivas
K. S. Ravindranath
Radiation Safety in Catheterization Laboratories: Gaps in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Cardiologists – A Cross-sectional Study in Tertiary Care Cardiac Center
Journal of Indian College of Cardiology
catheterization laboratory
dose monitoring
occupational hazard
radiation safety
title Radiation Safety in Catheterization Laboratories: Gaps in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Cardiologists – A Cross-sectional Study in Tertiary Care Cardiac Center
title_full Radiation Safety in Catheterization Laboratories: Gaps in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Cardiologists – A Cross-sectional Study in Tertiary Care Cardiac Center
title_fullStr Radiation Safety in Catheterization Laboratories: Gaps in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Cardiologists – A Cross-sectional Study in Tertiary Care Cardiac Center
title_full_unstemmed Radiation Safety in Catheterization Laboratories: Gaps in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Cardiologists – A Cross-sectional Study in Tertiary Care Cardiac Center
title_short Radiation Safety in Catheterization Laboratories: Gaps in Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Cardiologists – A Cross-sectional Study in Tertiary Care Cardiac Center
title_sort radiation safety in catheterization laboratories gaps in knowledge attitudes and practices among cardiologists a cross sectional study in tertiary care cardiac center
topic catheterization laboratory
dose monitoring
occupational hazard
radiation safety
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jicc.jicc_4_25
work_keys_str_mv AT dnarendran radiationsafetyincatheterizationlaboratoriesgapsinknowledgeattitudesandpracticesamongcardiologistsacrosssectionalstudyintertiarycarecardiaccenter
AT bharathrajkidambi radiationsafetyincatheterizationlaboratoriesgapsinknowledgeattitudesandpracticesamongcardiologistsacrosssectionalstudyintertiarycarecardiaccenter
AT acnagamani radiationsafetyincatheterizationlaboratoriesgapsinknowledgeattitudesandpracticesamongcardiologistsacrosssectionalstudyintertiarycarecardiaccenter
AT khsrinivas radiationsafetyincatheterizationlaboratoriesgapsinknowledgeattitudesandpracticesamongcardiologistsacrosssectionalstudyintertiarycarecardiaccenter
AT ksravindranath radiationsafetyincatheterizationlaboratoriesgapsinknowledgeattitudesandpracticesamongcardiologistsacrosssectionalstudyintertiarycarecardiaccenter