COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION
Comparative analysis of two methods of analysis shaft fatigue strength including Chinese Machine Design Handbook method and American National Standard namely AGMA（ American Gear Manufacturers Association） standard ANSIAGMA 6001-D97 method. This essayanalysisthesecalculation process about these two m...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | zho |
| Published: |
Editorial Office of Journal of Mechanical Strength
2017-01-01
|
| Series: | Jixie qiangdu |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jxqd.net.cn/thesisDetails#10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2017.01.032 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841535064429559808 |
|---|---|
| author | ZHENG YuTian LIU ShaoJun |
| author_facet | ZHENG YuTian LIU ShaoJun |
| author_sort | ZHENG YuTian |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Comparative analysis of two methods of analysis shaft fatigue strength including Chinese Machine Design Handbook method and American National Standard namely AGMA（ American Gear Manufacturers Association） standard ANSIAGMA 6001-D97 method. This essayanalysisthesecalculation process about these two methods and set examples to find out there major difference and their adaption to different situations. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5bd48998def74d1d8d9469ffc6a26b60 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1001-9669 |
| language | zho |
| publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
| publisher | Editorial Office of Journal of Mechanical Strength |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jixie qiangdu |
| spelling | doaj-art-5bd48998def74d1d8d9469ffc6a26b602025-01-15T02:35:06ZzhoEditorial Office of Journal of Mechanical StrengthJixie qiangdu1001-96692017-01-013918819330597675COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATIONZHENG YuTianLIU ShaoJunComparative analysis of two methods of analysis shaft fatigue strength including Chinese Machine Design Handbook method and American National Standard namely AGMA（ American Gear Manufacturers Association） standard ANSIAGMA 6001-D97 method. This essayanalysisthesecalculation process about these two methods and set examples to find out there major difference and their adaption to different situations.http://www.jxqd.net.cn/thesisDetails#10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2017.01.032ANSI-AGMA 6001-D97Fatigue strength of shaftComparison |
| spellingShingle | ZHENG YuTian LIU ShaoJun COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION Jixie qiangdu ANSI-AGMA 6001-D97 Fatigue strength of shaft Comparison |
| title | COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION |
| title_full | COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION |
| title_fullStr | COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION |
| title_full_unstemmed | COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION |
| title_short | COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO METHODS OF AXIAL FATIGUE STRENGTH CALCULATION |
| title_sort | comparison and analysis of two methods of axial fatigue strength calculation |
| topic | ANSI-AGMA 6001-D97 Fatigue strength of shaft Comparison |
| url | http://www.jxqd.net.cn/thesisDetails#10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2017.01.032 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengyutian comparisonandanalysisoftwomethodsofaxialfatiguestrengthcalculation AT liushaojun comparisonandanalysisoftwomethodsofaxialfatiguestrengthcalculation |