Breast Implant Illness May Be Rooted in Mast Cell Activation: A Case-Controlled Retrospective Analysis

Objective:. To investigate the possible association between breast implant illness (BII) and mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), which often manifests increased mast cells (MCs) in assorted tissues and may explain BII symptoms. Background:. Mechanisms by which implants cause BII symptoms remain un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Èva S. Nagy, BMedSci(Hons), MBBS, PhD, FRACS, Grad Cert (Breast Surgery), Mark Westaway, MBBS, DCH, Grad Dip Allergy, Suzanne Danieletto, BSc, MBBS (Hons), FRCPA, MIAC, Lawrence B. Afrin, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Health 2024-03-01
Series:Annals of Surgery Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000398
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589699159425024
author Èva S. Nagy, BMedSci(Hons), MBBS, PhD, FRACS, Grad Cert (Breast Surgery)
Mark Westaway, MBBS, DCH, Grad Dip Allergy
Suzanne Danieletto, BSc, MBBS (Hons), FRCPA, MIAC
Lawrence B. Afrin, MD
author_facet Èva S. Nagy, BMedSci(Hons), MBBS, PhD, FRACS, Grad Cert (Breast Surgery)
Mark Westaway, MBBS, DCH, Grad Dip Allergy
Suzanne Danieletto, BSc, MBBS (Hons), FRCPA, MIAC
Lawrence B. Afrin, MD
author_sort Èva S. Nagy, BMedSci(Hons), MBBS, PhD, FRACS, Grad Cert (Breast Surgery)
collection DOAJ
description Objective:. To investigate the possible association between breast implant illness (BII) and mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), which often manifests increased mast cells (MCs) in assorted tissues and may explain BII symptoms. Background:. Mechanisms by which implants cause BII symptoms remain unclear, but BII and MCAS symptom profiles heavily overlap, warranting investigation of potential linkage. Methods:. We retrospectively analyzed 20 implant patients who underwent explantation and total capsulectomy; 15 self-reported preoperatively they had BII (subject group); 5 felt they did not [control group 1 (CG1)]. Five prophylactic mastectomy patients constituted control group 2 (CG2). Subjects and CG1 patients completed BII symptom questionnaires preoperatively and multiple points postoperatively. With CD117 staining, average and maximum mast cell counts (MCCs) in resected tissues were determined. Results:. Mean BII symptom score 2 weeks postexplantation was reduced by 77% (P < 0.0001), and 85% by 9 months. Analysis suggested BII in CG1 patients, too, who improved similarly. Among CG2 patients, healthy breast tissue showed mean and maximum MCCs of 5.0/hpf and 6.9/hpf. Mean and maximum MCCs in capsules in BII patients were 11.7/hpf and 16.3/hpf, and 7.6/hpf and 13.3/hpf in CG1 patients. All intergroup comparisons were significantly different (P < 0.0001). Conclusions:. MCCs in peri-implant capsules in BII patients are increased; some implanted patients appear to have unrecognized BII. Given that neoantigenic/xenobiotic exposures commonly trigger dysfunctional MCs in MCAS to heighten aberrant mediator expression driving inflammatory and other issues, further investigation of whether BII represents an implant-driven escalation of preexisting MCAS and whether an MCAS diagnosis flags risk for BII seems warranted.
format Article
id doaj-art-5bc9cf0fc2e74d879574e1372e137235
institution Kabale University
issn 2691-3593
language English
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format Article
series Annals of Surgery Open
spelling doaj-art-5bc9cf0fc2e74d879574e1372e1372352025-01-24T09:18:25ZengWolters Kluwer HealthAnnals of Surgery Open2691-35932024-03-0151e39810.1097/AS9.0000000000000398202403000-00033Breast Implant Illness May Be Rooted in Mast Cell Activation: A Case-Controlled Retrospective AnalysisÈva S. Nagy, BMedSci(Hons), MBBS, PhD, FRACS, Grad Cert (Breast Surgery)0Mark Westaway, MBBS, DCH, Grad Dip Allergy1Suzanne Danieletto, BSc, MBBS (Hons), FRCPA, MIAC2Lawrence B. Afrin, MD3* From the Sydney Oncoplastic Surgery, North Shore Health Hub, St Leonards, NSW, Australia† Coronation Medical, Milton, QLD, Australia‡ Douglas Hanly Moir, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia§ AIM Center for Personalized Medicine, Purchase, NY.Objective:. To investigate the possible association between breast implant illness (BII) and mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), which often manifests increased mast cells (MCs) in assorted tissues and may explain BII symptoms. Background:. Mechanisms by which implants cause BII symptoms remain unclear, but BII and MCAS symptom profiles heavily overlap, warranting investigation of potential linkage. Methods:. We retrospectively analyzed 20 implant patients who underwent explantation and total capsulectomy; 15 self-reported preoperatively they had BII (subject group); 5 felt they did not [control group 1 (CG1)]. Five prophylactic mastectomy patients constituted control group 2 (CG2). Subjects and CG1 patients completed BII symptom questionnaires preoperatively and multiple points postoperatively. With CD117 staining, average and maximum mast cell counts (MCCs) in resected tissues were determined. Results:. Mean BII symptom score 2 weeks postexplantation was reduced by 77% (P < 0.0001), and 85% by 9 months. Analysis suggested BII in CG1 patients, too, who improved similarly. Among CG2 patients, healthy breast tissue showed mean and maximum MCCs of 5.0/hpf and 6.9/hpf. Mean and maximum MCCs in capsules in BII patients were 11.7/hpf and 16.3/hpf, and 7.6/hpf and 13.3/hpf in CG1 patients. All intergroup comparisons were significantly different (P < 0.0001). Conclusions:. MCCs in peri-implant capsules in BII patients are increased; some implanted patients appear to have unrecognized BII. Given that neoantigenic/xenobiotic exposures commonly trigger dysfunctional MCs in MCAS to heighten aberrant mediator expression driving inflammatory and other issues, further investigation of whether BII represents an implant-driven escalation of preexisting MCAS and whether an MCAS diagnosis flags risk for BII seems warranted.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000398
spellingShingle Èva S. Nagy, BMedSci(Hons), MBBS, PhD, FRACS, Grad Cert (Breast Surgery)
Mark Westaway, MBBS, DCH, Grad Dip Allergy
Suzanne Danieletto, BSc, MBBS (Hons), FRCPA, MIAC
Lawrence B. Afrin, MD
Breast Implant Illness May Be Rooted in Mast Cell Activation: A Case-Controlled Retrospective Analysis
Annals of Surgery Open
title Breast Implant Illness May Be Rooted in Mast Cell Activation: A Case-Controlled Retrospective Analysis
title_full Breast Implant Illness May Be Rooted in Mast Cell Activation: A Case-Controlled Retrospective Analysis
title_fullStr Breast Implant Illness May Be Rooted in Mast Cell Activation: A Case-Controlled Retrospective Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Breast Implant Illness May Be Rooted in Mast Cell Activation: A Case-Controlled Retrospective Analysis
title_short Breast Implant Illness May Be Rooted in Mast Cell Activation: A Case-Controlled Retrospective Analysis
title_sort breast implant illness may be rooted in mast cell activation a case controlled retrospective analysis
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000398
work_keys_str_mv AT evasnagybmedscihonsmbbsphdfracsgradcertbreastsurgery breastimplantillnessmayberootedinmastcellactivationacasecontrolledretrospectiveanalysis
AT markwestawaymbbsdchgraddipallergy breastimplantillnessmayberootedinmastcellactivationacasecontrolledretrospectiveanalysis
AT suzannedanielettobscmbbshonsfrcpamiac breastimplantillnessmayberootedinmastcellactivationacasecontrolledretrospectiveanalysis
AT lawrencebafrinmd breastimplantillnessmayberootedinmastcellactivationacasecontrolledretrospectiveanalysis