Comparing State-level policy responses to economic reforms in India

By rewriting the rules of economic governance in India’s federal democracy, economic reforms adopted in the 1990s have had far-reaching consequences on the relations between the Union (or central state) and the States. First, the dismantling of the centralised management of the economy has created g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Loraine Kennedy, Kim Robin, Diego Zamuner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Recherche & Régulation 2013-06-01
Series:Revue de la Régulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/10247
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832577891082174464
author Loraine Kennedy
Kim Robin
Diego Zamuner
author_facet Loraine Kennedy
Kim Robin
Diego Zamuner
author_sort Loraine Kennedy
collection DOAJ
description By rewriting the rules of economic governance in India’s federal democracy, economic reforms adopted in the 1990s have had far-reaching consequences on the relations between the Union (or central state) and the States. First, the dismantling of the centralised management of the economy has created greater scope for State governments to elaborate their economic development policies. Second, the reforms require cooperation from State governments and hence State-level politics and governance have taken on greater importance for India’s overall development trajectory. On the basis of fieldwork-based research, this paper discusses policy frameworks in four States (Andhra Pradesh, Haryana, Kerala and Orissa) comparing and contrasting their promotional policies, aimed at attracting investments, as well as their approaches to structural reforms. For each case we explain political actions and discourse using a qualitative political economy approach. The article addresses a gap in the existing literature, which tends to focus on inter-State comparisons of economic performance. There has been relatively little academic attention to the comparative study of State-level policy response to the national economic reform agenda. One of the objectives of this study is to understand how subnational political elites, who now have more ‘policy space’ (if not necessarily more fiscal space), elaborate their economic development strategies in relation to the central state, on one hand, and to social forces in their political jurisdictions, on the other. We examine the social compromises that are expressed by these State-level policies, which provide evidence of the distinct political economies prevailing in India at the subnational level.
format Article
id doaj-art-5b959f211d1a4c4dbd167b07c6dd495c
institution Kabale University
issn 1957-7796
language English
publishDate 2013-06-01
publisher Association Recherche & Régulation
record_format Article
series Revue de la Régulation
spelling doaj-art-5b959f211d1a4c4dbd167b07c6dd495c2025-01-30T14:26:27ZengAssociation Recherche & RégulationRevue de la Régulation1957-77962013-06-011310.4000/regulation.10247Comparing State-level policy responses to economic reforms in IndiaLoraine KennedyKim RobinDiego ZamunerBy rewriting the rules of economic governance in India’s federal democracy, economic reforms adopted in the 1990s have had far-reaching consequences on the relations between the Union (or central state) and the States. First, the dismantling of the centralised management of the economy has created greater scope for State governments to elaborate their economic development policies. Second, the reforms require cooperation from State governments and hence State-level politics and governance have taken on greater importance for India’s overall development trajectory. On the basis of fieldwork-based research, this paper discusses policy frameworks in four States (Andhra Pradesh, Haryana, Kerala and Orissa) comparing and contrasting their promotional policies, aimed at attracting investments, as well as their approaches to structural reforms. For each case we explain political actions and discourse using a qualitative political economy approach. The article addresses a gap in the existing literature, which tends to focus on inter-State comparisons of economic performance. There has been relatively little academic attention to the comparative study of State-level policy response to the national economic reform agenda. One of the objectives of this study is to understand how subnational political elites, who now have more ‘policy space’ (if not necessarily more fiscal space), elaborate their economic development strategies in relation to the central state, on one hand, and to social forces in their political jurisdictions, on the other. We examine the social compromises that are expressed by these State-level policies, which provide evidence of the distinct political economies prevailing in India at the subnational level.https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/10247Indiapolitical régulationsubnational political economyeconomic governanceeconomic reforms
spellingShingle Loraine Kennedy
Kim Robin
Diego Zamuner
Comparing State-level policy responses to economic reforms in India
Revue de la Régulation
India
political régulation
subnational political economy
economic governance
economic reforms
title Comparing State-level policy responses to economic reforms in India
title_full Comparing State-level policy responses to economic reforms in India
title_fullStr Comparing State-level policy responses to economic reforms in India
title_full_unstemmed Comparing State-level policy responses to economic reforms in India
title_short Comparing State-level policy responses to economic reforms in India
title_sort comparing state level policy responses to economic reforms in india
topic India
political régulation
subnational political economy
economic governance
economic reforms
url https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/10247
work_keys_str_mv AT lorainekennedy comparingstatelevelpolicyresponsestoeconomicreformsinindia
AT kimrobin comparingstatelevelpolicyresponsestoeconomicreformsinindia
AT diegozamuner comparingstatelevelpolicyresponsestoeconomicreformsinindia