Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study

Integrating Clinical Ethics Consultants (CECs) into healthcare requires understanding how they apply bioethical knowledge while managing cognitive and emotional challenges in ethical deliberations. Ethical consultations often elicit strong emotions, yet their impact on decision-making remains undere...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Margherita Dahò
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-05-01
Series:Behavioral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/6/748
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849433221578620928
author Margherita Dahò
author_facet Margherita Dahò
author_sort Margherita Dahò
collection DOAJ
description Integrating Clinical Ethics Consultants (CECs) into healthcare requires understanding how they apply bioethical knowledge while managing cognitive and emotional challenges in ethical deliberations. Ethical consultations often elicit strong emotions, yet their impact on decision-making remains underexplored. This study explores the emotional responses of 52 CECs from the United States and 10 European countries through a semi-structured survey. Participants selected a real ethical case they had encountered and described their emotional reactions during and after deliberation. Findings revealed that almost 77% of CECs experienced negative emotions such as frustration, sadness, or anger during deliberation, while 21% reported neutral or positive feelings. Although satisfaction and relief increased after deliberation, negative emotions often persisted. Additionally, 45% of participants reported feelings of inadequacy or remorse, 12% expressed uncertainty about their decision, and 5% stated they would change their decision in hindsight. The accumulation of negative emotions may affect CECs’ well-being and judgment, highlighting the need for structured support. Managing cognitive and emotional demands is essential to maintaining CECs’ effectiveness, underscoring the importance of targeted training programs and support strategies to enhance ethical decision-making and resilience in high-stakes medical contexts.
format Article
id doaj-art-5b8321adca19400a8f210500157fac84
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-328X
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Behavioral Sciences
spelling doaj-art-5b8321adca19400a8f210500157fac842025-08-20T03:27:09ZengMDPI AGBehavioral Sciences2076-328X2025-05-0115674810.3390/bs15060748Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory StudyMargherita Dahò0Department of Psychology, Educational Sciences and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Viale Delle Scienze Ed. 15, 90128 Palermo, ItalyIntegrating Clinical Ethics Consultants (CECs) into healthcare requires understanding how they apply bioethical knowledge while managing cognitive and emotional challenges in ethical deliberations. Ethical consultations often elicit strong emotions, yet their impact on decision-making remains underexplored. This study explores the emotional responses of 52 CECs from the United States and 10 European countries through a semi-structured survey. Participants selected a real ethical case they had encountered and described their emotional reactions during and after deliberation. Findings revealed that almost 77% of CECs experienced negative emotions such as frustration, sadness, or anger during deliberation, while 21% reported neutral or positive feelings. Although satisfaction and relief increased after deliberation, negative emotions often persisted. Additionally, 45% of participants reported feelings of inadequacy or remorse, 12% expressed uncertainty about their decision, and 5% stated they would change their decision in hindsight. The accumulation of negative emotions may affect CECs’ well-being and judgment, highlighting the need for structured support. Managing cognitive and emotional demands is essential to maintaining CECs’ effectiveness, underscoring the importance of targeted training programs and support strategies to enhance ethical decision-making and resilience in high-stakes medical contexts.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/6/748decision-makingmoral reasoningemotioncognitive psychologymedical ethicsclinical ethics
spellingShingle Margherita Dahò
Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study
Behavioral Sciences
decision-making
moral reasoning
emotion
cognitive psychology
medical ethics
clinical ethics
title Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study
title_full Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study
title_fullStr Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study
title_full_unstemmed Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study
title_short Emotional Responses in Clinical Ethics Consultation Decision-Making: An Exploratory Study
title_sort emotional responses in clinical ethics consultation decision making an exploratory study
topic decision-making
moral reasoning
emotion
cognitive psychology
medical ethics
clinical ethics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/6/748
work_keys_str_mv AT margheritadaho emotionalresponsesinclinicalethicsconsultationdecisionmakinganexploratorystudy