Comparison between minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation for geriatric osteoporotic spine fracture in a rural hospital
Background: Research aimed to see if minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (MIPPS)or open pedicle screw fixation (OPS) worked effectively for geriatric osteoporotic fractures (#) of the spine. Methods: In the department of neurosurgery at the tertiary care centre, 60 cases of ger...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
London Academic Publishing
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Romanian Neurosurgery |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/roneurosurgery/article/view/2766 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841560238056013824 |
|---|---|
| author | Sajag Gupta |
| author_facet | Sajag Gupta |
| author_sort | Sajag Gupta |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Background: Research aimed to see if minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (MIPPS)or open pedicle screw fixation (OPS) worked effectively for geriatric osteoporotic fractures (#) of the spine.
Methods: In the department of neurosurgery at the tertiary care centre, 60 cases of geriatric osteoporotic vertebral # were divided into a MIPPS set (n=30 MIPPS) and an OPS set (n=30, conventional OPS).
Results: The experimental set surgical time, surgical bleeding, incision size, days of hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative complications were smaller than those in the control set (all P <0.05). Both sets' Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improved 6 months following surgery, with the experimental set showing the most improvement (all P<0.05).
Conclusions: Both sets of MIPPS and OPS may accomplish adequate internal fixation, with the former having reduced trauma, a less surgical duration, a quicker recovery, fewer postsurgical problems, and less post-surgical discomfort.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5b51866afb9f42fb90c3bb5bf82bd944 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1220-8841 2344-4959 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | London Academic Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Romanian Neurosurgery |
| spelling | doaj-art-5b51866afb9f42fb90c3bb5bf82bd9442025-01-04T15:59:34ZengLondon Academic PublishingRomanian Neurosurgery1220-88412344-49592024-12-01384Comparison between minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation for geriatric osteoporotic spine fracture in a rural hospitalSajag Gupta Background: Research aimed to see if minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (MIPPS)or open pedicle screw fixation (OPS) worked effectively for geriatric osteoporotic fractures (#) of the spine. Methods: In the department of neurosurgery at the tertiary care centre, 60 cases of geriatric osteoporotic vertebral # were divided into a MIPPS set (n=30 MIPPS) and an OPS set (n=30, conventional OPS). Results: The experimental set surgical time, surgical bleeding, incision size, days of hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative complications were smaller than those in the control set (all P <0.05). Both sets' Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improved 6 months following surgery, with the experimental set showing the most improvement (all P<0.05). Conclusions: Both sets of MIPPS and OPS may accomplish adequate internal fixation, with the former having reduced trauma, a less surgical duration, a quicker recovery, fewer postsurgical problems, and less post-surgical discomfort. http://journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/roneurosurgery/article/view/2766minimally invasive spine surgeryosteoporotic fracture |
| spellingShingle | Sajag Gupta Comparison between minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation for geriatric osteoporotic spine fracture in a rural hospital Romanian Neurosurgery minimally invasive spine surgery osteoporotic fracture |
| title | Comparison between minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation for geriatric osteoporotic spine fracture in a rural hospital |
| title_full | Comparison between minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation for geriatric osteoporotic spine fracture in a rural hospital |
| title_fullStr | Comparison between minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation for geriatric osteoporotic spine fracture in a rural hospital |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation for geriatric osteoporotic spine fracture in a rural hospital |
| title_short | Comparison between minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation for geriatric osteoporotic spine fracture in a rural hospital |
| title_sort | comparison between minimally invasive percutaneous pedicle screw fixation versus open pedicle screw fixation for geriatric osteoporotic spine fracture in a rural hospital |
| topic | minimally invasive spine surgery osteoporotic fracture |
| url | http://journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/roneurosurgery/article/view/2766 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sajaggupta comparisonbetweenminimallyinvasivepercutaneouspediclescrewfixationversusopenpediclescrewfixationforgeriatricosteoporoticspinefractureinaruralhospital |