Nondestructive Evaluation of FRP-Concrete Interface Bond due to Surface Defects

Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates have been successfully used as externally bonded reinforcements for retrofitting, strengthening, and confinement of concrete structures. The adequacy of the CFRP-concrete bonding largely depends on the bond quality and integrity. The bond quality may...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nur Yazdani, Eyosias Beneberu, Mina Riad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2563079
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849410649759678464
author Nur Yazdani
Eyosias Beneberu
Mina Riad
author_facet Nur Yazdani
Eyosias Beneberu
Mina Riad
author_sort Nur Yazdani
collection DOAJ
description Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates have been successfully used as externally bonded reinforcements for retrofitting, strengthening, and confinement of concrete structures. The adequacy of the CFRP-concrete bonding largely depends on the bond quality and integrity. The bond quality may be compromised during the CFRP installation process due to various factors. In this study, the effect of four such construction-related factors was assessed through nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods, and quantification of the levels of CFRP debonding was achieved. The factors were surface cleanliness, surface wetness, upward vs. downward application, and surface voids. A common unidirectional CFRP was applied to small-scale concrete samples with factorial combinations. Ground-penetrating radar and thermography NDE methods were applied to detect possible disbonds at CFRP-concrete interfaces. Thermography was found to clearly detect all four factors, while the GPR was only effective for detecting the surface voids only. The thermal images overpredicted the amount of debonded CFRP areas by about 25%, possibly due to scaling errors between the thermograph and the sample surface. The maximum debonded CFRP area in any sample was about two percent of the total CFRP area. This is a negligible amount of debonding, showing that the factors considered are unlikely to significantly affect the laminate performance or any CFRP contribution to the concrete member strength or confinement.
format Article
id doaj-art-5b4a72939c6b459cb3ec318ffa8ebb68
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8086
1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-5b4a72939c6b459cb3ec318ffa8ebb682025-08-20T03:35:01ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80861687-80942019-01-01201910.1155/2019/25630792563079Nondestructive Evaluation of FRP-Concrete Interface Bond due to Surface DefectsNur Yazdani0Eyosias Beneberu1Mina Riad2Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Box 19308, Arlington, TX 76019, USAStructural Engineer, Bridgefarmer & Associates, 2350 Valley View Lane, Dallas, TX 75234, USASenior Structural Designer, HSA and Associates, 1906 W Garvey Ave S., #200, West Covina, CA 91790, USACarbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates have been successfully used as externally bonded reinforcements for retrofitting, strengthening, and confinement of concrete structures. The adequacy of the CFRP-concrete bonding largely depends on the bond quality and integrity. The bond quality may be compromised during the CFRP installation process due to various factors. In this study, the effect of four such construction-related factors was assessed through nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods, and quantification of the levels of CFRP debonding was achieved. The factors were surface cleanliness, surface wetness, upward vs. downward application, and surface voids. A common unidirectional CFRP was applied to small-scale concrete samples with factorial combinations. Ground-penetrating radar and thermography NDE methods were applied to detect possible disbonds at CFRP-concrete interfaces. Thermography was found to clearly detect all four factors, while the GPR was only effective for detecting the surface voids only. The thermal images overpredicted the amount of debonded CFRP areas by about 25%, possibly due to scaling errors between the thermograph and the sample surface. The maximum debonded CFRP area in any sample was about two percent of the total CFRP area. This is a negligible amount of debonding, showing that the factors considered are unlikely to significantly affect the laminate performance or any CFRP contribution to the concrete member strength or confinement.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2563079
spellingShingle Nur Yazdani
Eyosias Beneberu
Mina Riad
Nondestructive Evaluation of FRP-Concrete Interface Bond due to Surface Defects
Advances in Civil Engineering
title Nondestructive Evaluation of FRP-Concrete Interface Bond due to Surface Defects
title_full Nondestructive Evaluation of FRP-Concrete Interface Bond due to Surface Defects
title_fullStr Nondestructive Evaluation of FRP-Concrete Interface Bond due to Surface Defects
title_full_unstemmed Nondestructive Evaluation of FRP-Concrete Interface Bond due to Surface Defects
title_short Nondestructive Evaluation of FRP-Concrete Interface Bond due to Surface Defects
title_sort nondestructive evaluation of frp concrete interface bond due to surface defects
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2563079
work_keys_str_mv AT nuryazdani nondestructiveevaluationoffrpconcreteinterfacebondduetosurfacedefects
AT eyosiasbeneberu nondestructiveevaluationoffrpconcreteinterfacebondduetosurfacedefects
AT minariad nondestructiveevaluationoffrpconcreteinterfacebondduetosurfacedefects