549 Mental health care for patients with potential decision-making capacity compromise: Challenging Ontario’s mental healthcare legislation
Objectives/Goals: How do we care for a patient whose mental health is deteriorated such that their decision-making capacity may be compromised? The high-potency opioid crisis in Ontario demands that we provide effective care for the affected population. We must also avoid patients having a subjectiv...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S205986612401121X/type/journal_article |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850097846174351360 |
|---|---|
| author | Leslie Shai Gilbert Sharpe Edyta Marcon |
| author_facet | Leslie Shai Gilbert Sharpe Edyta Marcon |
| author_sort | Leslie Shai |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives/Goals: How do we care for a patient whose mental health is deteriorated such that their decision-making capacity may be compromised? The high-potency opioid crisis in Ontario demands that we provide effective care for the affected population. We must also avoid patients having a subjective experience of coercion and must protect their human rights and dignity. Methods/Study Population: Ontario’s legislation governing mental health care will be explored: the Ontario Mental Health, Healthcare Consent, and Substitute Decisions Acts. We will identify best practices/learning across locales. Patients who have been involuntarily treated/confined will be welcomed to voice what the law should contain. International strategies for: coercion reduction practices, advanced care directives, less prohibitionist care culture, and supports for social determinants of health (SDH) may also help Ontarians. Patients, family members, law enforcement, judiciary, community agencies, and healthcare professionals will be invited to contribute via focus groups to drafted mental health care legislative improvements. Thus, we ensure law enforces patient-defined quality care and practical workflows. Results/Anticipated Results: We hope to emerge from our focus group consultation with draft legislative and procedural edits for Ontario’s mental healthcare laws to ensure that the laws protect human rights and that the laws reflect patient-defined needs. We must ensure controls are in place to de-risk power imbalances and limit the incidence of potential procedural misuse. We intend to design legislated procedures to ensure that people don’t get inappropriately involuntarily confined/treated. We will incorporate the perspectives and lived experiences of patients who have experienced involuntary treatment and/or involuntary medical confinement (locally in a focus group(s)) and internationally (in literature) to inform this legislative development. Discussion/Significance of Impact: We will learn from engaged stakeholders about how to shape Ontario’s legislation to support quality mental health care. We hope to identify and draft legislation improvements that voice what patients and their families’ value, drafts informed by evidence-based best practices and informed innovation. Via inclusion, we create a policy that serves. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5b36bdf16e814ab08158e037dee09bd1 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2059-8661 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
| spelling | doaj-art-5b36bdf16e814ab08158e037dee09bd12025-08-20T02:40:51ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612025-04-01916016010.1017/cts.2024.1121549 Mental health care for patients with potential decision-making capacity compromise: Challenging Ontario’s mental healthcare legislationLeslie Shai0Gilbert Sharpe1Edyta Marcon2University of TorontoUniversity of TorontoUniversity of TorontoObjectives/Goals: How do we care for a patient whose mental health is deteriorated such that their decision-making capacity may be compromised? The high-potency opioid crisis in Ontario demands that we provide effective care for the affected population. We must also avoid patients having a subjective experience of coercion and must protect their human rights and dignity. Methods/Study Population: Ontario’s legislation governing mental health care will be explored: the Ontario Mental Health, Healthcare Consent, and Substitute Decisions Acts. We will identify best practices/learning across locales. Patients who have been involuntarily treated/confined will be welcomed to voice what the law should contain. International strategies for: coercion reduction practices, advanced care directives, less prohibitionist care culture, and supports for social determinants of health (SDH) may also help Ontarians. Patients, family members, law enforcement, judiciary, community agencies, and healthcare professionals will be invited to contribute via focus groups to drafted mental health care legislative improvements. Thus, we ensure law enforces patient-defined quality care and practical workflows. Results/Anticipated Results: We hope to emerge from our focus group consultation with draft legislative and procedural edits for Ontario’s mental healthcare laws to ensure that the laws protect human rights and that the laws reflect patient-defined needs. We must ensure controls are in place to de-risk power imbalances and limit the incidence of potential procedural misuse. We intend to design legislated procedures to ensure that people don’t get inappropriately involuntarily confined/treated. We will incorporate the perspectives and lived experiences of patients who have experienced involuntary treatment and/or involuntary medical confinement (locally in a focus group(s)) and internationally (in literature) to inform this legislative development. Discussion/Significance of Impact: We will learn from engaged stakeholders about how to shape Ontario’s legislation to support quality mental health care. We hope to identify and draft legislation improvements that voice what patients and their families’ value, drafts informed by evidence-based best practices and informed innovation. Via inclusion, we create a policy that serves.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S205986612401121X/type/journal_article |
| spellingShingle | Leslie Shai Gilbert Sharpe Edyta Marcon 549 Mental health care for patients with potential decision-making capacity compromise: Challenging Ontario’s mental healthcare legislation Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
| title | 549 Mental health care for patients with potential decision-making capacity compromise: Challenging Ontario’s mental healthcare legislation |
| title_full | 549 Mental health care for patients with potential decision-making capacity compromise: Challenging Ontario’s mental healthcare legislation |
| title_fullStr | 549 Mental health care for patients with potential decision-making capacity compromise: Challenging Ontario’s mental healthcare legislation |
| title_full_unstemmed | 549 Mental health care for patients with potential decision-making capacity compromise: Challenging Ontario’s mental healthcare legislation |
| title_short | 549 Mental health care for patients with potential decision-making capacity compromise: Challenging Ontario’s mental healthcare legislation |
| title_sort | 549 mental health care for patients with potential decision making capacity compromise challenging ontario s mental healthcare legislation |
| url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S205986612401121X/type/journal_article |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leslieshai 549mentalhealthcareforpatientswithpotentialdecisionmakingcapacitycompromisechallengingontariosmentalhealthcarelegislation AT gilbertsharpe 549mentalhealthcareforpatientswithpotentialdecisionmakingcapacitycompromisechallengingontariosmentalhealthcarelegislation AT edytamarcon 549mentalhealthcareforpatientswithpotentialdecisionmakingcapacitycompromisechallengingontariosmentalhealthcarelegislation |