SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers

Background. The humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in hemodialysis patients needs to be clarified. Methods. In this retrospective study performed in two dialysis facilities, we measured the circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients who were on maintenance hemodialysis during the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henri Boulanger, Salima Ahriz Saksi, Jedjiga Achiche, Florence Batusanski, Nicolas Stawiarski, Ali Diddaoui, Luc Fromentin, Mokhtar Chawki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Nephrology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4747221
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832565713899880448
author Henri Boulanger
Salima Ahriz Saksi
Jedjiga Achiche
Florence Batusanski
Nicolas Stawiarski
Ali Diddaoui
Luc Fromentin
Mokhtar Chawki
author_facet Henri Boulanger
Salima Ahriz Saksi
Jedjiga Achiche
Florence Batusanski
Nicolas Stawiarski
Ali Diddaoui
Luc Fromentin
Mokhtar Chawki
author_sort Henri Boulanger
collection DOAJ
description Background. The humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in hemodialysis patients needs to be clarified. Methods. In this retrospective study performed in two dialysis facilities, we measured the circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients who were on maintenance hemodialysis during the first wave of the epidemic in March and April 2020 and were still alive 6 months later. We also investigated associations between the patients diagnosed as infected during the first wave and several clinical, biological, and radiological parameters of COVID-19. Finally, we compared these circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with those of a control group of healthcare workers infected during the same period. Results. Of the 299 hemodialysis patients who recovered from the first wave of the epidemic 6 months before, 59 had a positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody whereas only 45 patients were diagnosed as infected during the first wave of the epidemic. All infected hemodialysis patients developed circulating antibodies. Using a clustering method, a significant correlation was identified between the cluster with the lowest circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and the severity of COVID-19 based on several parameters including CRP, BNP, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and oxygen requirements, as well as pulmonary involvement on chest scan. Moreover, the circulating levels of the SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in surviving hemodialysis patients (n = 59) were similar to those of the control group (n = 17). Conclusion. The main finding of this study is that all of the surviving hemodialysis patients who were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March to April 2020 developed a persistent humoral response with significant circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, 6 months later. Another important finding is that surviving hemodialysis patients who had more severe disease had lower circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Finally, circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were similar in surviving hemodialysis patients and healthcare workers without kidney disease.
format Article
id doaj-art-5af5bd80cd7a43e18cfb182ac227bb64
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-2158
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Nephrology
spelling doaj-art-5af5bd80cd7a43e18cfb182ac227bb642025-02-03T01:06:50ZengWileyInternational Journal of Nephrology2090-21582021-01-01202110.1155/2021/4747221SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare WorkersHenri Boulanger0Salima Ahriz Saksi1Jedjiga Achiche2Florence Batusanski3Nicolas Stawiarski4Ali Diddaoui5Luc Fromentin6Mokhtar Chawki7Department of Nephrology and DialysisDepartment of Nephrology and DialysisDepartment of Nephrology and DialysisMedical Analysis LaboratoryMedical Analysis LaboratoryDepartment of Nephrology and DialysisDepartment of Nephrology and DialysisDepartment of Nephrology and DialysisBackground. The humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in hemodialysis patients needs to be clarified. Methods. In this retrospective study performed in two dialysis facilities, we measured the circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients who were on maintenance hemodialysis during the first wave of the epidemic in March and April 2020 and were still alive 6 months later. We also investigated associations between the patients diagnosed as infected during the first wave and several clinical, biological, and radiological parameters of COVID-19. Finally, we compared these circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with those of a control group of healthcare workers infected during the same period. Results. Of the 299 hemodialysis patients who recovered from the first wave of the epidemic 6 months before, 59 had a positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody whereas only 45 patients were diagnosed as infected during the first wave of the epidemic. All infected hemodialysis patients developed circulating antibodies. Using a clustering method, a significant correlation was identified between the cluster with the lowest circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and the severity of COVID-19 based on several parameters including CRP, BNP, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and oxygen requirements, as well as pulmonary involvement on chest scan. Moreover, the circulating levels of the SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in surviving hemodialysis patients (n = 59) were similar to those of the control group (n = 17). Conclusion. The main finding of this study is that all of the surviving hemodialysis patients who were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March to April 2020 developed a persistent humoral response with significant circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, 6 months later. Another important finding is that surviving hemodialysis patients who had more severe disease had lower circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Finally, circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were similar in surviving hemodialysis patients and healthcare workers without kidney disease.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4747221
spellingShingle Henri Boulanger
Salima Ahriz Saksi
Jedjiga Achiche
Florence Batusanski
Nicolas Stawiarski
Ali Diddaoui
Luc Fromentin
Mokhtar Chawki
SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers
International Journal of Nephrology
title SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers
title_full SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers
title_short SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers
title_sort sars cov 2 antibodies in hemodialysis patients six months after infection compared to healthcare workers
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4747221
work_keys_str_mv AT henriboulanger sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers
AT salimaahrizsaksi sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers
AT jedjigaachiche sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers
AT florencebatusanski sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers
AT nicolasstawiarski sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers
AT alididdaoui sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers
AT lucfromentin sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers
AT mokhtarchawki sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers