SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers
Background. The humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in hemodialysis patients needs to be clarified. Methods. In this retrospective study performed in two dialysis facilities, we measured the circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients who were on maintenance hemodialysis during the...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Nephrology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4747221 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832565713899880448 |
---|---|
author | Henri Boulanger Salima Ahriz Saksi Jedjiga Achiche Florence Batusanski Nicolas Stawiarski Ali Diddaoui Luc Fromentin Mokhtar Chawki |
author_facet | Henri Boulanger Salima Ahriz Saksi Jedjiga Achiche Florence Batusanski Nicolas Stawiarski Ali Diddaoui Luc Fromentin Mokhtar Chawki |
author_sort | Henri Boulanger |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background. The humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in hemodialysis patients needs to be clarified. Methods. In this retrospective study performed in two dialysis facilities, we measured the circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients who were on maintenance hemodialysis during the first wave of the epidemic in March and April 2020 and were still alive 6 months later. We also investigated associations between the patients diagnosed as infected during the first wave and several clinical, biological, and radiological parameters of COVID-19. Finally, we compared these circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with those of a control group of healthcare workers infected during the same period. Results. Of the 299 hemodialysis patients who recovered from the first wave of the epidemic 6 months before, 59 had a positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody whereas only 45 patients were diagnosed as infected during the first wave of the epidemic. All infected hemodialysis patients developed circulating antibodies. Using a clustering method, a significant correlation was identified between the cluster with the lowest circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and the severity of COVID-19 based on several parameters including CRP, BNP, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and oxygen requirements, as well as pulmonary involvement on chest scan. Moreover, the circulating levels of the SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in surviving hemodialysis patients (n = 59) were similar to those of the control group (n = 17). Conclusion. The main finding of this study is that all of the surviving hemodialysis patients who were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March to April 2020 developed a persistent humoral response with significant circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, 6 months later. Another important finding is that surviving hemodialysis patients who had more severe disease had lower circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Finally, circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were similar in surviving hemodialysis patients and healthcare workers without kidney disease. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-5af5bd80cd7a43e18cfb182ac227bb64 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-2158 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Nephrology |
spelling | doaj-art-5af5bd80cd7a43e18cfb182ac227bb642025-02-03T01:06:50ZengWileyInternational Journal of Nephrology2090-21582021-01-01202110.1155/2021/4747221SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare WorkersHenri Boulanger0Salima Ahriz Saksi1Jedjiga Achiche2Florence Batusanski3Nicolas Stawiarski4Ali Diddaoui5Luc Fromentin6Mokhtar Chawki7Department of Nephrology and DialysisDepartment of Nephrology and DialysisDepartment of Nephrology and DialysisMedical Analysis LaboratoryMedical Analysis LaboratoryDepartment of Nephrology and DialysisDepartment of Nephrology and DialysisDepartment of Nephrology and DialysisBackground. The humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in hemodialysis patients needs to be clarified. Methods. In this retrospective study performed in two dialysis facilities, we measured the circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients who were on maintenance hemodialysis during the first wave of the epidemic in March and April 2020 and were still alive 6 months later. We also investigated associations between the patients diagnosed as infected during the first wave and several clinical, biological, and radiological parameters of COVID-19. Finally, we compared these circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with those of a control group of healthcare workers infected during the same period. Results. Of the 299 hemodialysis patients who recovered from the first wave of the epidemic 6 months before, 59 had a positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody whereas only 45 patients were diagnosed as infected during the first wave of the epidemic. All infected hemodialysis patients developed circulating antibodies. Using a clustering method, a significant correlation was identified between the cluster with the lowest circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and the severity of COVID-19 based on several parameters including CRP, BNP, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and oxygen requirements, as well as pulmonary involvement on chest scan. Moreover, the circulating levels of the SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in surviving hemodialysis patients (n = 59) were similar to those of the control group (n = 17). Conclusion. The main finding of this study is that all of the surviving hemodialysis patients who were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March to April 2020 developed a persistent humoral response with significant circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, 6 months later. Another important finding is that surviving hemodialysis patients who had more severe disease had lower circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Finally, circulating levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were similar in surviving hemodialysis patients and healthcare workers without kidney disease.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4747221 |
spellingShingle | Henri Boulanger Salima Ahriz Saksi Jedjiga Achiche Florence Batusanski Nicolas Stawiarski Ali Diddaoui Luc Fromentin Mokhtar Chawki SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers International Journal of Nephrology |
title | SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers |
title_full | SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers |
title_fullStr | SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers |
title_full_unstemmed | SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers |
title_short | SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Hemodialysis Patients Six Months after Infection Compared to Healthcare Workers |
title_sort | sars cov 2 antibodies in hemodialysis patients six months after infection compared to healthcare workers |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4747221 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henriboulanger sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers AT salimaahrizsaksi sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers AT jedjigaachiche sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers AT florencebatusanski sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers AT nicolasstawiarski sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers AT alididdaoui sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers AT lucfromentin sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers AT mokhtarchawki sarscov2antibodiesinhemodialysispatientssixmonthsafterinfectioncomparedtohealthcareworkers |