County Smoke-Free Laws and Asthma Discharges: Evidence from 17 US States

Background. Although approximately 82 percent of the US population was covered by some form of law that restricted smoking in public establishments as of 2014, most research examining the relationship between smoke-free laws and health has been focused at the state level. Purpose. To examine the eff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Glenn M. Landers, Patricia Ketsche, Mark L. Diana, Claudia Campbell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Canadian Respiratory Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6321258
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563149518143488
author Glenn M. Landers
Patricia Ketsche
Mark L. Diana
Claudia Campbell
author_facet Glenn M. Landers
Patricia Ketsche
Mark L. Diana
Claudia Campbell
author_sort Glenn M. Landers
collection DOAJ
description Background. Although approximately 82 percent of the US population was covered by some form of law that restricted smoking in public establishments as of 2014, most research examining the relationship between smoke-free laws and health has been focused at the state level. Purpose. To examine the effect of county workplace smoke-free laws over and above the effect of other (restaurant or bar) smoke-free laws on adult asthma. Methods. The study estimated the effect of rates of adult asthma discharges before and after the implementation of county nonhospitality workplace smoke-free laws and county restaurant and bar smoke-free laws. Data were from 2002 to 2009, and all analyses were performed in 2011 through 2013. Results. A statistically significant relationship (−5.43, p<.05) was found between county restaurant or bar smoke-free laws and reductions in working age adult asthma discharges. There was no statistically significant effect of nonhospitality workplace smoke-free laws over and above the effect of county restaurant or bar laws. Conclusions. This study suggests that further gains in preventable asthma-related hospitalizations in the US are more likely to be made by focusing on smoke-free laws in bars or restaurants rather than in nonhospitality workplaces.
format Article
id doaj-art-5ae0cf40d56c47a2805dbe580b8a7b46
institution Kabale University
issn 1198-2241
1916-7245
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Respiratory Journal
spelling doaj-art-5ae0cf40d56c47a2805dbe580b8a7b462025-02-03T01:20:48ZengWileyCanadian Respiratory Journal1198-22411916-72452017-01-01201710.1155/2017/63212586321258County Smoke-Free Laws and Asthma Discharges: Evidence from 17 US StatesGlenn M. Landers0Patricia Ketsche1Mark L. Diana2Claudia Campbell3Georgia Health Policy Center, Georgia State University, 55 Park Place, 8th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30303, USARobinson College of Business, Georgia State University, 35 Broad St., Atlanta, GA 30303, USADepartment of Global Health Systems Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USADepartment of Global Health Systems Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USABackground. Although approximately 82 percent of the US population was covered by some form of law that restricted smoking in public establishments as of 2014, most research examining the relationship between smoke-free laws and health has been focused at the state level. Purpose. To examine the effect of county workplace smoke-free laws over and above the effect of other (restaurant or bar) smoke-free laws on adult asthma. Methods. The study estimated the effect of rates of adult asthma discharges before and after the implementation of county nonhospitality workplace smoke-free laws and county restaurant and bar smoke-free laws. Data were from 2002 to 2009, and all analyses were performed in 2011 through 2013. Results. A statistically significant relationship (−5.43, p<.05) was found between county restaurant or bar smoke-free laws and reductions in working age adult asthma discharges. There was no statistically significant effect of nonhospitality workplace smoke-free laws over and above the effect of county restaurant or bar laws. Conclusions. This study suggests that further gains in preventable asthma-related hospitalizations in the US are more likely to be made by focusing on smoke-free laws in bars or restaurants rather than in nonhospitality workplaces.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6321258
spellingShingle Glenn M. Landers
Patricia Ketsche
Mark L. Diana
Claudia Campbell
County Smoke-Free Laws and Asthma Discharges: Evidence from 17 US States
Canadian Respiratory Journal
title County Smoke-Free Laws and Asthma Discharges: Evidence from 17 US States
title_full County Smoke-Free Laws and Asthma Discharges: Evidence from 17 US States
title_fullStr County Smoke-Free Laws and Asthma Discharges: Evidence from 17 US States
title_full_unstemmed County Smoke-Free Laws and Asthma Discharges: Evidence from 17 US States
title_short County Smoke-Free Laws and Asthma Discharges: Evidence from 17 US States
title_sort county smoke free laws and asthma discharges evidence from 17 us states
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6321258
work_keys_str_mv AT glennmlanders countysmokefreelawsandasthmadischargesevidencefrom17usstates
AT patriciaketsche countysmokefreelawsandasthmadischargesevidencefrom17usstates
AT markldiana countysmokefreelawsandasthmadischargesevidencefrom17usstates
AT claudiacampbell countysmokefreelawsandasthmadischargesevidencefrom17usstates