Physician Perceptions of the Safety and Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Underestimation of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction and Discrepancies with Clinical Evidence

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/GLP-1 receptor agonists (GIP/GLP-1 RAs) are emerging as effective treatments for obesity and cardiometabolic disease. This study evaluated physician perceptions of the safety and efficacy of semagl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Srikanth Krishnan, Pratyaksh K. Srivastava, Jayram Attaluri, Rebecca Nayeri, Dhananjay Chatterjee, Jay Patel, Ali Nsair, Matthew Budoff, Arash Nayeri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/12/1/19
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588274690949120
author Srikanth Krishnan
Pratyaksh K. Srivastava
Jayram Attaluri
Rebecca Nayeri
Dhananjay Chatterjee
Jay Patel
Ali Nsair
Matthew Budoff
Arash Nayeri
author_facet Srikanth Krishnan
Pratyaksh K. Srivastava
Jayram Attaluri
Rebecca Nayeri
Dhananjay Chatterjee
Jay Patel
Ali Nsair
Matthew Budoff
Arash Nayeri
author_sort Srikanth Krishnan
collection DOAJ
description Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/GLP-1 receptor agonists (GIP/GLP-1 RAs) are emerging as effective treatments for obesity and cardiometabolic disease. This study evaluated physician perceptions of the safety and efficacy of semaglutide and tirzepatide through a questionnaire administered to 165 attending physicians specializing in internal or family medicine, with 122 responses received. Physicians reported an average patient weight loss of 9.22%, significantly lower than the 14.9% and 18.5% reported in the STEP and SURMOUNT trials, respectively. Estimated side effect rates (32.62%) were markedly lower than trial-reported rates (89.7% and 80.5%), while estimated discontinuation rates (8.59%) exceeded trial data. Cardiovascular benefits were perceived by 48.4% of physicians in diabetic patients, consistent with random guessing, and by only 39.3% in nondiabetic patients, significantly below random guessing expectations. These results highlight discrepancies between physician perceptions and clinical evidence, suggesting gaps in understanding regarding these agents’ efficacy and safety profiles. Addressing these gaps could enhance physician knowledge, patient adherence, and clinical outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-5ad2e11ab76a46d29db506362f362fcc
institution Kabale University
issn 2308-3425
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
spelling doaj-art-5ad2e11ab76a46d29db506362f362fcc2025-01-24T13:36:00ZengMDPI AGJournal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease2308-34252025-01-011211910.3390/jcdd12010019Physician Perceptions of the Safety and Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Underestimation of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction and Discrepancies with Clinical EvidenceSrikanth Krishnan0Pratyaksh K. Srivastava1Jayram Attaluri2Rebecca Nayeri3Dhananjay Chatterjee4Jay Patel5Ali Nsair6Matthew Budoff7Arash Nayeri8The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA 90502, USADepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USAFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Kings College London, London SE1 9NH, UKDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USADepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USADepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USADepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USAThe Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA 90502, USACedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USAGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/GLP-1 receptor agonists (GIP/GLP-1 RAs) are emerging as effective treatments for obesity and cardiometabolic disease. This study evaluated physician perceptions of the safety and efficacy of semaglutide and tirzepatide through a questionnaire administered to 165 attending physicians specializing in internal or family medicine, with 122 responses received. Physicians reported an average patient weight loss of 9.22%, significantly lower than the 14.9% and 18.5% reported in the STEP and SURMOUNT trials, respectively. Estimated side effect rates (32.62%) were markedly lower than trial-reported rates (89.7% and 80.5%), while estimated discontinuation rates (8.59%) exceeded trial data. Cardiovascular benefits were perceived by 48.4% of physicians in diabetic patients, consistent with random guessing, and by only 39.3% in nondiabetic patients, significantly below random guessing expectations. These results highlight discrepancies between physician perceptions and clinical evidence, suggesting gaps in understanding regarding these agents’ efficacy and safety profiles. Addressing these gaps could enhance physician knowledge, patient adherence, and clinical outcomes.https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/12/1/19GIP GLP-1 receptor agonistmetabolic syndromeobesityweight losssemaglutidetirzepatide
spellingShingle Srikanth Krishnan
Pratyaksh K. Srivastava
Jayram Attaluri
Rebecca Nayeri
Dhananjay Chatterjee
Jay Patel
Ali Nsair
Matthew Budoff
Arash Nayeri
Physician Perceptions of the Safety and Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Underestimation of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction and Discrepancies with Clinical Evidence
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
GIP GLP-1 receptor agonist
metabolic syndrome
obesity
weight loss
semaglutide
tirzepatide
title Physician Perceptions of the Safety and Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Underestimation of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction and Discrepancies with Clinical Evidence
title_full Physician Perceptions of the Safety and Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Underestimation of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction and Discrepancies with Clinical Evidence
title_fullStr Physician Perceptions of the Safety and Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Underestimation of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction and Discrepancies with Clinical Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Physician Perceptions of the Safety and Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Underestimation of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction and Discrepancies with Clinical Evidence
title_short Physician Perceptions of the Safety and Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Underestimation of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction and Discrepancies with Clinical Evidence
title_sort physician perceptions of the safety and efficacy of glp 1 receptor agonists underestimation of cardiovascular risk reduction and discrepancies with clinical evidence
topic GIP GLP-1 receptor agonist
metabolic syndrome
obesity
weight loss
semaglutide
tirzepatide
url https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3425/12/1/19
work_keys_str_mv AT srikanthkrishnan physicianperceptionsofthesafetyandefficacyofglp1receptoragonistsunderestimationofcardiovascularriskreductionanddiscrepancieswithclinicalevidence
AT pratyakshksrivastava physicianperceptionsofthesafetyandefficacyofglp1receptoragonistsunderestimationofcardiovascularriskreductionanddiscrepancieswithclinicalevidence
AT jayramattaluri physicianperceptionsofthesafetyandefficacyofglp1receptoragonistsunderestimationofcardiovascularriskreductionanddiscrepancieswithclinicalevidence
AT rebeccanayeri physicianperceptionsofthesafetyandefficacyofglp1receptoragonistsunderestimationofcardiovascularriskreductionanddiscrepancieswithclinicalevidence
AT dhananjaychatterjee physicianperceptionsofthesafetyandefficacyofglp1receptoragonistsunderestimationofcardiovascularriskreductionanddiscrepancieswithclinicalevidence
AT jaypatel physicianperceptionsofthesafetyandefficacyofglp1receptoragonistsunderestimationofcardiovascularriskreductionanddiscrepancieswithclinicalevidence
AT alinsair physicianperceptionsofthesafetyandefficacyofglp1receptoragonistsunderestimationofcardiovascularriskreductionanddiscrepancieswithclinicalevidence
AT matthewbudoff physicianperceptionsofthesafetyandefficacyofglp1receptoragonistsunderestimationofcardiovascularriskreductionanddiscrepancieswithclinicalevidence
AT arashnayeri physicianperceptionsofthesafetyandefficacyofglp1receptoragonistsunderestimationofcardiovascularriskreductionanddiscrepancieswithclinicalevidence