The Machiavellian Spectacle in Shakespeare’s <i>Measure for Measure</i>

In <i>Measure for Measure</i> Shakespeare addresses a question that is both straightforward and hard to answer: how do we make people obey the law? Over the course of the play, this simple question gives way to a complex set of problems about human will, political legitimacy, and the ori...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrew Moore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Literature
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2410-9789/5/1/2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850279778051948544
author Andrew Moore
author_facet Andrew Moore
author_sort Andrew Moore
collection DOAJ
description In <i>Measure for Measure</i> Shakespeare addresses a question that is both straightforward and hard to answer: how do we make people obey the law? Over the course of the play, this simple question gives way to a complex set of problems about human will, political legitimacy, and the origins of sovereign power. <i>Measure for Measure</i> is concerned with illicit activity and ineffective government. But in this comedy—this “problem play”—Shakespeare is especially interested in the political mechanism by which authority and obedience are restored. How is a delinquent population, used to license, brought under control? Shakespeare examines one strategy in this play, one he has seemingly adapted from the Florentine political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli. Multiple critics have recognized that the story of Duke Vincentio and his deviant deputy, Lord Angelo, bear a striking resemblance to the story Machiavelli tells about Cesare Borgia and Remirro de Orco in Chapter 7 of <i>The Prince</i>. Here, I build upon these analyses to offer a new account of Shakespeare’s relationship to Machiavelli and political realism more generally. The Cesare story provides Shakespeare with an opportunity to explore how spectacle and theatricality can be used—not only to subdue an unruly population but to legitimate sovereign authority. However, Shakespeare delves deeper than Machiavelli into the mechanism whereby political authority is reestablished, first by considering the psychological conditions of the Duke’s subjects (both before and during his spectacular display of power), and second, by emphasizing the need for individual citizens to will sovereign authority into being. As we will see, in Shakespeare’s Vienna, order can only be restored once the delinquent people beg to be governed.
format Article
id doaj-art-5ac08c6d6d2c4aed80da65ab68ae10df
institution OA Journals
issn 2410-9789
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Literature
spelling doaj-art-5ac08c6d6d2c4aed80da65ab68ae10df2025-08-20T01:49:00ZengMDPI AGLiterature2410-97892024-12-0151210.3390/literature5010002The Machiavellian Spectacle in Shakespeare’s <i>Measure for Measure</i>Andrew Moore0Great Books, St. Thomas University, Fredericton, NB E3B 5G3, CanadaIn <i>Measure for Measure</i> Shakespeare addresses a question that is both straightforward and hard to answer: how do we make people obey the law? Over the course of the play, this simple question gives way to a complex set of problems about human will, political legitimacy, and the origins of sovereign power. <i>Measure for Measure</i> is concerned with illicit activity and ineffective government. But in this comedy—this “problem play”—Shakespeare is especially interested in the political mechanism by which authority and obedience are restored. How is a delinquent population, used to license, brought under control? Shakespeare examines one strategy in this play, one he has seemingly adapted from the Florentine political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli. Multiple critics have recognized that the story of Duke Vincentio and his deviant deputy, Lord Angelo, bear a striking resemblance to the story Machiavelli tells about Cesare Borgia and Remirro de Orco in Chapter 7 of <i>The Prince</i>. Here, I build upon these analyses to offer a new account of Shakespeare’s relationship to Machiavelli and political realism more generally. The Cesare story provides Shakespeare with an opportunity to explore how spectacle and theatricality can be used—not only to subdue an unruly population but to legitimate sovereign authority. However, Shakespeare delves deeper than Machiavelli into the mechanism whereby political authority is reestablished, first by considering the psychological conditions of the Duke’s subjects (both before and during his spectacular display of power), and second, by emphasizing the need for individual citizens to will sovereign authority into being. As we will see, in Shakespeare’s Vienna, order can only be restored once the delinquent people beg to be governed.https://www.mdpi.com/2410-9789/5/1/2ShakespeareMachiavellirealpolitikpoliticsCesare Borgia<i>Measure for Measure</i>
spellingShingle Andrew Moore
The Machiavellian Spectacle in Shakespeare’s <i>Measure for Measure</i>
Literature
Shakespeare
Machiavelli
realpolitik
politics
Cesare Borgia
<i>Measure for Measure</i>
title The Machiavellian Spectacle in Shakespeare’s <i>Measure for Measure</i>
title_full The Machiavellian Spectacle in Shakespeare’s <i>Measure for Measure</i>
title_fullStr The Machiavellian Spectacle in Shakespeare’s <i>Measure for Measure</i>
title_full_unstemmed The Machiavellian Spectacle in Shakespeare’s <i>Measure for Measure</i>
title_short The Machiavellian Spectacle in Shakespeare’s <i>Measure for Measure</i>
title_sort machiavellian spectacle in shakespeare s i measure for measure i
topic Shakespeare
Machiavelli
realpolitik
politics
Cesare Borgia
<i>Measure for Measure</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2410-9789/5/1/2
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewmoore themachiavellianspectacleinshakespearesimeasureformeasurei
AT andrewmoore machiavellianspectacleinshakespearesimeasureformeasurei