Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence

Background: The study aimed to determine whether there was a difference or an association between auditory memory and visual memory in typically developing children. Methods: Eighteen children, aged 8 to 12 years, with normal hearing and visual acuity, were evaluated using the Children’s Memory S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanjana Singh S, Asha Yathiraj
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AVES 2024-09-01
Series:Journal of International Advanced Otology
Online Access:https://www.advancedotology.org/en/auditory-memory-and-visual-memory-in-typically-developing-children-modality-dependence-independence-131956
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832543637610692608
author Sanjana Singh S
Asha Yathiraj
author_facet Sanjana Singh S
Asha Yathiraj
author_sort Sanjana Singh S
collection DOAJ
description Background: The study aimed to determine whether there was a difference or an association between auditory memory and visual memory in typically developing children. Methods: Eighteen children, aged 8 to 12 years, with normal hearing and visual acuity, were evaluated using the Children’s Memory Scale (CMS) to determine their auditory and visual memory performance. Using the core subtest battery of the CMS, auditory/verbal (immediate and delayed), visual/nonverbal (immediate and delayed), and general memory index scores were assessed. Results: No significant difference was found between auditory/verbal memory and visual/nonverbal memory scores for both immediate and delayed recall. Likewise, no correlation between auditory/verbal memory and visual/nonverbal memory scores was found. However, there was a significant correlation between immediate and delayed recall scores within each modality. Conclusions: The non-significant difference between the two modalities for both immediate and delayed recall gives the impression that memory is modality independent. However, the lack of any correlation between the two suggests there was no association between them. The absence of a significant difference between modalities can be attributed to the auditory and visual test material used in CMS not being analogous. It can thus be inferred that the auditory and visual modalities are independent. While the visual material evaluates simultaneous/concurrent perception, the auditory material assesses sequential perception.
format Article
id doaj-art-5ac08557a86c41a785d16d2155485d25
institution Kabale University
issn 2148-3817
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher AVES
record_format Article
series Journal of International Advanced Otology
spelling doaj-art-5ac08557a86c41a785d16d2155485d252025-02-03T11:35:46ZengAVESJournal of International Advanced Otology2148-38172024-09-0120540541010.5152/iao.2024.241504Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ IndependenceSanjana Singh S0Asha Yathiraj1Department of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, IndiaDepartment of Audiology, JSS Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysuru, IndiaBackground: The study aimed to determine whether there was a difference or an association between auditory memory and visual memory in typically developing children. Methods: Eighteen children, aged 8 to 12 years, with normal hearing and visual acuity, were evaluated using the Children’s Memory Scale (CMS) to determine their auditory and visual memory performance. Using the core subtest battery of the CMS, auditory/verbal (immediate and delayed), visual/nonverbal (immediate and delayed), and general memory index scores were assessed. Results: No significant difference was found between auditory/verbal memory and visual/nonverbal memory scores for both immediate and delayed recall. Likewise, no correlation between auditory/verbal memory and visual/nonverbal memory scores was found. However, there was a significant correlation between immediate and delayed recall scores within each modality. Conclusions: The non-significant difference between the two modalities for both immediate and delayed recall gives the impression that memory is modality independent. However, the lack of any correlation between the two suggests there was no association between them. The absence of a significant difference between modalities can be attributed to the auditory and visual test material used in CMS not being analogous. It can thus be inferred that the auditory and visual modalities are independent. While the visual material evaluates simultaneous/concurrent perception, the auditory material assesses sequential perception.https://www.advancedotology.org/en/auditory-memory-and-visual-memory-in-typically-developing-children-modality-dependence-independence-131956
spellingShingle Sanjana Singh S
Asha Yathiraj
Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence
Journal of International Advanced Otology
title Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence
title_full Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence
title_fullStr Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence
title_full_unstemmed Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence
title_short Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence
title_sort auditory memory and visual memory in typically developing children modality dependence independence
url https://www.advancedotology.org/en/auditory-memory-and-visual-memory-in-typically-developing-children-modality-dependence-independence-131956
work_keys_str_mv AT sanjanasinghs auditorymemoryandvisualmemoryintypicallydevelopingchildrenmodalitydependenceindependence
AT ashayathiraj auditorymemoryandvisualmemoryintypicallydevelopingchildrenmodalitydependenceindependence