Pushkin’s dilogy: “Stanzas” (1826) and “In the depths of Siberian mines” (1826 <?>)
The author believes that the poem “In the Depths of Siberian Mines” was written at the same time, or nearly simultaneously, as the “Stanzas” — in December 1826. Both poems arose as a result of a lengthy conversation with the Tsar on September 8, 1826. The author consistently provides a number of sou...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Литературный факт |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://litfact.ru/images/2024-34/4_Altshuller.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850131481204097024 |
|---|---|
| author | Mark G. Altshuller |
| author_facet | Mark G. Altshuller |
| author_sort | Mark G. Altshuller |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The author believes that the poem “In the Depths of Siberian Mines” was written at the same time, or nearly simultaneously, as the “Stanzas” — in December 1826. Both poems arose as a result of a lengthy conversation with the Tsar on September 8, 1826. The author consistently provides a number of sources (memoirs of Volkonskaya, Pushchin, Bartenev, etc.), which allows us to make some assumptions about the dating of these poems. We surmise that the main idea of “In the Depths...” is a firm hope not only for the liberation of the Decembrists but also for the return of their civil rights and involvement in social and state activities. Most Decembrists did not understand or accept this idea. A.I. Odoevsky’s poem, written in response to Pushkin, is a coherent polemic against Pushkin’s verse. Considering the functioning of the “sword” lexeme and its semantic realization in the lyrical works of poets, the author vividly demonstrates the different views on the future of Russia. If Pushkin’s sword is a symbol of noble honor, then for Odoevsky, it is a striking weapon capable of leading the people to the kingdom of freedom. In addition, after the publication of the “Message to Siberia,” a whole discussion unfolded about the political content of the text. Some researchers held the point of view, especially popular in Soviet times, that Pushkin’s poems have revolutionary rhetoric (it was popular in Soviet times). Others took a less radical position and believed that the poet was talking about freeing comrades and restoring their rights. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5a9d21ab669c4448a00d18d467fc51bd |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2541-8297 2542-2421 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Литературный факт |
| spelling | doaj-art-5a9d21ab669c4448a00d18d467fc51bd2025-08-20T02:32:25ZengRussian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World LiteratureЛитературный факт2541-82972542-24212024-12-01434779210.22455/2541-8297-2024-34-77-92Pushkin’s dilogy: “Stanzas” (1826) and “In the depths of Siberian mines” (1826 <?>)Mark G. Altshuller0University of PittsburghThe author believes that the poem “In the Depths of Siberian Mines” was written at the same time, or nearly simultaneously, as the “Stanzas” — in December 1826. Both poems arose as a result of a lengthy conversation with the Tsar on September 8, 1826. The author consistently provides a number of sources (memoirs of Volkonskaya, Pushchin, Bartenev, etc.), which allows us to make some assumptions about the dating of these poems. We surmise that the main idea of “In the Depths...” is a firm hope not only for the liberation of the Decembrists but also for the return of their civil rights and involvement in social and state activities. Most Decembrists did not understand or accept this idea. A.I. Odoevsky’s poem, written in response to Pushkin, is a coherent polemic against Pushkin’s verse. Considering the functioning of the “sword” lexeme and its semantic realization in the lyrical works of poets, the author vividly demonstrates the different views on the future of Russia. If Pushkin’s sword is a symbol of noble honor, then for Odoevsky, it is a striking weapon capable of leading the people to the kingdom of freedom. In addition, after the publication of the “Message to Siberia,” a whole discussion unfolded about the political content of the text. Some researchers held the point of view, especially popular in Soviet times, that Pushkin’s poems have revolutionary rhetoric (it was popular in Soviet times). Others took a less radical position and believed that the poet was talking about freeing comrades and restoring their rights.https://litfact.ru/images/2024-34/4_Altshuller.pdfalexander pushkinalexander odoevsky“stanzas”“in the depths of siberian mines”dating of works |
| spellingShingle | Mark G. Altshuller Pushkin’s dilogy: “Stanzas” (1826) and “In the depths of Siberian mines” (1826 <?>) Литературный факт alexander pushkin alexander odoevsky “stanzas” “in the depths of siberian mines” dating of works |
| title | Pushkin’s dilogy: “Stanzas” (1826) and “In the depths of Siberian mines” (1826 <?>) |
| title_full | Pushkin’s dilogy: “Stanzas” (1826) and “In the depths of Siberian mines” (1826 <?>) |
| title_fullStr | Pushkin’s dilogy: “Stanzas” (1826) and “In the depths of Siberian mines” (1826 <?>) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pushkin’s dilogy: “Stanzas” (1826) and “In the depths of Siberian mines” (1826 <?>) |
| title_short | Pushkin’s dilogy: “Stanzas” (1826) and “In the depths of Siberian mines” (1826 <?>) |
| title_sort | pushkin s dilogy stanzas 1826 and in the depths of siberian mines 1826 |
| topic | alexander pushkin alexander odoevsky “stanzas” “in the depths of siberian mines” dating of works |
| url | https://litfact.ru/images/2024-34/4_Altshuller.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT markgaltshuller pushkinsdilogystanzas1826andinthedepthsofsiberianmines1826 |