Dilemmas of democracy: challenges to parliamentary practices from the UK public and parliamentarians

The absence of a codified constitution for the United Kingdom combined with numerous parliamentary conventions often perceived as arcane unwritten rules, made the need for guidelines on parliamentary proceedings particularly acute. Thus, in the XIXth century, the initiative came from outside Parliam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elizabeth Gibson-Morgan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses universitaires de Rennes 2022-11-01
Series:Revue LISA
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/lisa/14483
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841558429496246272
author Elizabeth Gibson-Morgan
author_facet Elizabeth Gibson-Morgan
author_sort Elizabeth Gibson-Morgan
collection DOAJ
description The absence of a codified constitution for the United Kingdom combined with numerous parliamentary conventions often perceived as arcane unwritten rules, made the need for guidelines on parliamentary proceedings particularly acute. Thus, in the XIXth century, the initiative came from outside Parliament with aspiring parliamentarians like Albert Venn Dicey in his Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution and Walter Bagehot in his English Constitution – two authoritative works on Parliament. But it also emanated from within Parliament with Erskine May, a former clerk of the House of Commons, the author of the invaluable Treatise upon the Law, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament – enlightening parliamentary procedure. MPs guides to procedure have also brought clarification and guidance to (new) members of the House. Indeed, Parliament is “a microcosm”, with its own rules and rituals. They contribute to widening the gap between Parliament and the People it represents. Unprecedented crisis – first Brexit then the Coronavirus pandemic – have stretched parliamentary practices to their limits leading to daunting challenges such as turning Parliament into a virtual or remote legislature making it more difficult for the latter to perform its key role of holding the government to account. Yet it could be an opportunity to rethink parliamentary practices while making them more accessible to the people, thus contributing to restoring trust between them without which there cannot be an effective democracy.
format Article
id doaj-art-5a94b55657b04806bbd30dc5b836b538
institution Kabale University
issn 1762-6153
language English
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Presses universitaires de Rennes
record_format Article
series Revue LISA
spelling doaj-art-5a94b55657b04806bbd30dc5b836b5382025-01-06T09:03:04ZengPresses universitaires de RennesRevue LISA1762-61532022-11-012010.4000/lisa.14483Dilemmas of democracy: challenges to parliamentary practices from the UK public and parliamentariansElizabeth Gibson-MorganThe absence of a codified constitution for the United Kingdom combined with numerous parliamentary conventions often perceived as arcane unwritten rules, made the need for guidelines on parliamentary proceedings particularly acute. Thus, in the XIXth century, the initiative came from outside Parliament with aspiring parliamentarians like Albert Venn Dicey in his Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution and Walter Bagehot in his English Constitution – two authoritative works on Parliament. But it also emanated from within Parliament with Erskine May, a former clerk of the House of Commons, the author of the invaluable Treatise upon the Law, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament – enlightening parliamentary procedure. MPs guides to procedure have also brought clarification and guidance to (new) members of the House. Indeed, Parliament is “a microcosm”, with its own rules and rituals. They contribute to widening the gap between Parliament and the People it represents. Unprecedented crisis – first Brexit then the Coronavirus pandemic – have stretched parliamentary practices to their limits leading to daunting challenges such as turning Parliament into a virtual or remote legislature making it more difficult for the latter to perform its key role of holding the government to account. Yet it could be an opportunity to rethink parliamentary practices while making them more accessible to the people, thus contributing to restoring trust between them without which there cannot be an effective democracy.https://journals.openedition.org/lisa/14483parliamentary practicesparliamentary committeesparliamentary cultureparliamentary conventionsusual channels
spellingShingle Elizabeth Gibson-Morgan
Dilemmas of democracy: challenges to parliamentary practices from the UK public and parliamentarians
Revue LISA
parliamentary practices
parliamentary committees
parliamentary culture
parliamentary conventions
usual channels
title Dilemmas of democracy: challenges to parliamentary practices from the UK public and parliamentarians
title_full Dilemmas of democracy: challenges to parliamentary practices from the UK public and parliamentarians
title_fullStr Dilemmas of democracy: challenges to parliamentary practices from the UK public and parliamentarians
title_full_unstemmed Dilemmas of democracy: challenges to parliamentary practices from the UK public and parliamentarians
title_short Dilemmas of democracy: challenges to parliamentary practices from the UK public and parliamentarians
title_sort dilemmas of democracy challenges to parliamentary practices from the uk public and parliamentarians
topic parliamentary practices
parliamentary committees
parliamentary culture
parliamentary conventions
usual channels
url https://journals.openedition.org/lisa/14483
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethgibsonmorgan dilemmasofdemocracychallengestoparliamentarypracticesfromtheukpublicandparliamentarians