Public Interest in Online Information on Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Is Greatest for Information with the Poorest Publication Quality

<i>Background</i>: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most prevalent bacterial infections. With many patients turning to the Internet as a health resource, this study seeks to understand public engagement with online resources concerning recurrent UTIs (rUTIs), assess their re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sapna Thaker, Justin Y. H. Chan, Karan N. Thaker, Rebecca A. Takele, Abigail F. Newlands, Kayleigh Maxwell, Yasin Bhanji, Melissa Kramer, Kymora B. Scotland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Pathogens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/13/12/1125
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850102747729231872
author Sapna Thaker
Justin Y. H. Chan
Karan N. Thaker
Rebecca A. Takele
Abigail F. Newlands
Kayleigh Maxwell
Yasin Bhanji
Melissa Kramer
Kymora B. Scotland
author_facet Sapna Thaker
Justin Y. H. Chan
Karan N. Thaker
Rebecca A. Takele
Abigail F. Newlands
Kayleigh Maxwell
Yasin Bhanji
Melissa Kramer
Kymora B. Scotland
author_sort Sapna Thaker
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background</i>: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most prevalent bacterial infections. With many patients turning to the Internet as a health resource, this study seeks to understand public engagement with online resources concerning recurrent UTIs (rUTIs), assess their reliability, and identify common questions/concerns about rUTIs. <i>Methods</i>: Social media analysis tool BuzzSumo was used to calculate online engagement (likes, shares, comments, views) with information on rUTIs. The reliability of highly engaged articles was evaluated using the DISCERN questionnaire. Highly engaged categories were entered as keywords in Google Trends to quantify search interest. To categorize patient-specific concerns, a database containing anonymously collected patient questions about rUTIs was created. <i>Results</i>: BuzzSumo revealed four search categories: general information, treatment, causes, and herbal remedies. DISCERN scores indicated moderate reliability overall; however, the “herbal remedies” category demonstrated poor reliability despite high engagement. Google Trends analysis highlighted “causes” and “treatment” searches as highest in relative interest. The 10 most popular categories of concern were antibiotics, microbiome, vaccines, prevention, pelvic pain, sex, testing, symptoms, diet/lifestyle, and hormones. <i>Conclusions</i>: People living with rUTIs demonstrate key concerns and often seek information online, yet articles with high engagement often contain unreliable information. Healthcare professionals may consider counteracting misinformation by providing evidence-based information online about rUTIs.
format Article
id doaj-art-5a6df71f9c1b440ab1c97bd993e6249e
institution DOAJ
issn 2076-0817
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pathogens
spelling doaj-art-5a6df71f9c1b440ab1c97bd993e6249e2025-08-20T02:39:41ZengMDPI AGPathogens2076-08172024-12-011312112510.3390/pathogens13121125Public Interest in Online Information on Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Is Greatest for Information with the Poorest Publication QualitySapna Thaker0Justin Y. H. Chan1Karan N. Thaker2Rebecca A. Takele3Abigail F. Newlands4Kayleigh Maxwell5Yasin Bhanji6Melissa Kramer7Kymora B. Scotland8Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USADepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S3H2, CanadaDepartment of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USASUNY Downstate Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooklyn, NY 11225, USASchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 7BE, UKLive UTI Free Ltd., D18 NW62 Dublin, IrelandDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USASchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 7BE, UKDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA<i>Background</i>: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most prevalent bacterial infections. With many patients turning to the Internet as a health resource, this study seeks to understand public engagement with online resources concerning recurrent UTIs (rUTIs), assess their reliability, and identify common questions/concerns about rUTIs. <i>Methods</i>: Social media analysis tool BuzzSumo was used to calculate online engagement (likes, shares, comments, views) with information on rUTIs. The reliability of highly engaged articles was evaluated using the DISCERN questionnaire. Highly engaged categories were entered as keywords in Google Trends to quantify search interest. To categorize patient-specific concerns, a database containing anonymously collected patient questions about rUTIs was created. <i>Results</i>: BuzzSumo revealed four search categories: general information, treatment, causes, and herbal remedies. DISCERN scores indicated moderate reliability overall; however, the “herbal remedies” category demonstrated poor reliability despite high engagement. Google Trends analysis highlighted “causes” and “treatment” searches as highest in relative interest. The 10 most popular categories of concern were antibiotics, microbiome, vaccines, prevention, pelvic pain, sex, testing, symptoms, diet/lifestyle, and hormones. <i>Conclusions</i>: People living with rUTIs demonstrate key concerns and often seek information online, yet articles with high engagement often contain unreliable information. Healthcare professionals may consider counteracting misinformation by providing evidence-based information online about rUTIs.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/13/12/1125urinary tract infectionsrecurrent urinary tract infectionspatient concernspatient engagementhealth-related information
spellingShingle Sapna Thaker
Justin Y. H. Chan
Karan N. Thaker
Rebecca A. Takele
Abigail F. Newlands
Kayleigh Maxwell
Yasin Bhanji
Melissa Kramer
Kymora B. Scotland
Public Interest in Online Information on Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Is Greatest for Information with the Poorest Publication Quality
Pathogens
urinary tract infections
recurrent urinary tract infections
patient concerns
patient engagement
health-related information
title Public Interest in Online Information on Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Is Greatest for Information with the Poorest Publication Quality
title_full Public Interest in Online Information on Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Is Greatest for Information with the Poorest Publication Quality
title_fullStr Public Interest in Online Information on Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Is Greatest for Information with the Poorest Publication Quality
title_full_unstemmed Public Interest in Online Information on Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Is Greatest for Information with the Poorest Publication Quality
title_short Public Interest in Online Information on Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections Is Greatest for Information with the Poorest Publication Quality
title_sort public interest in online information on recurrent urinary tract infections is greatest for information with the poorest publication quality
topic urinary tract infections
recurrent urinary tract infections
patient concerns
patient engagement
health-related information
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/13/12/1125
work_keys_str_mv AT sapnathaker publicinterestinonlineinformationonrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsisgreatestforinformationwiththepoorestpublicationquality
AT justinyhchan publicinterestinonlineinformationonrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsisgreatestforinformationwiththepoorestpublicationquality
AT karannthaker publicinterestinonlineinformationonrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsisgreatestforinformationwiththepoorestpublicationquality
AT rebeccaatakele publicinterestinonlineinformationonrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsisgreatestforinformationwiththepoorestpublicationquality
AT abigailfnewlands publicinterestinonlineinformationonrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsisgreatestforinformationwiththepoorestpublicationquality
AT kayleighmaxwell publicinterestinonlineinformationonrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsisgreatestforinformationwiththepoorestpublicationquality
AT yasinbhanji publicinterestinonlineinformationonrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsisgreatestforinformationwiththepoorestpublicationquality
AT melissakramer publicinterestinonlineinformationonrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsisgreatestforinformationwiththepoorestpublicationquality
AT kymorabscotland publicinterestinonlineinformationonrecurrenturinarytractinfectionsisgreatestforinformationwiththepoorestpublicationquality