The effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment

Background. Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is a second most common pediatric bone tumor. About one quarter of all patients belong to a high-risk group characterized by a poor prognosis. In spite of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) being traditional...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. V. Yukhta, I. V. Kazantsev, A. G. Gevorgyan, P. S. Tolkunova, A. V. Kozlov, D. A. Zvyagintseva, T. V. Andreeva, B. I. Smirnov, E. V. Morozova, S. A. Safonova, Yu. А. Punanov, L. S. Zubarovskaya, B. V. Afanasyev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: ABV-press 2019-12-01
Series:Онкогематология
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/383
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background. Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is a second most common pediatric bone tumor. About one quarter of all patients belong to a high-risk group characterized by a poor prognosis. In spite of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) being traditionally viewed as a possible option for high-risk patients, there is stills no consensus on indications for this method in EWS patients.Study objective: to evaluate the HDCT effectiveness and most important prognostic factors in a prospective cohort of high-risk EWS patients. Materials and methods. A total of 73 EWS patients receiving treatment in R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute were included in the study. All patients were characterized by one or several high-risk features: local (primary tumor volume >200 ml, axial localization, poor response to chemotherapy; n = 55; 76 %), primary disseminated disease (n = 58; 80 %), first chemoresponsive relapse (n = 7; 9 %). All patients received a myeloablative consolidation regimen consisting of busulfan 16mg/kg and melphalan 140mg/m2. In patients with primary disseminated disease an additional evaluation according to risk scale by R. Ladenstein et al. was performed. Based on risk points all patients were stratified as standard (n = 20), high (n = 26), and ultrahigh risk (n = 12).Results. The 5-year overall and event-free survivalfor a whole studied cohort were 40 and 37 %, accordingly. In patients with high-risk localized disease the 5-year overall and event-free survival were 48 and 45 %, accordingly. The HDCT regimen was characterized by acceptable toxicity. The main non-hematologic toxicities were infectious complications (n = 61) and gastrointestinal tract mucositis (n = 31). One patient of 76 died due to treatment-related complications. The multivariate analysis revealed the following risk factors: therapy response (hazard ratio (HR) 2.2; p <0.01), bone marrow involvement (HR 5.0; p = 0.01), primary tumor volume (HR 1.9; p = 0.01), and number of bone metastases (HR 2.2; p = 0.05). The risk group determined by R. Ladenstein score was also a good predictor for outcome with only 8 % of ultrahigh risk patients surviving 5 years past auto-HSCT.Conclusion. HDCT with auto-HSCT may potentially improve treatment results in some high-risk patient subgroups. While risk scale may help to determine patients most likely to benefit from this approach, the outcome in ultrahigh risk patients are still dismal.
ISSN:1818-8346
2413-4023