The Dangerous Dichotomy: Abandoning the ‘Proscriptive’ and ‘Prescriptive’ Classification of Fiduciary Duties and the ‘Proscriptive Limitation’
The ‘proscriptive’ (negative) and ‘prescriptive’ (positive) dichotomy of fiduciary duties has attracted great contemporary interest, as the High Court has held that fiduciary duties are only proscriptive. The ‘dichotomy’ and ‘proscriptive limitation’ have been debated by scholars and judges. This ar...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Nicholas Saady |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bond University
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | Bond Law Review |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.5664 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Subscription and proscription in Marlowe’s Edward II
by: Yan Brailowsky
Published: (2012-04-01) -
<i>Proscription</i> lists and predatory publishers: Pointing to careful certifications
by: Marco Cascella, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Les listes de proscriptions au temps de la Ligue
by: Marco Penzi
Published: (2014-11-01) -
Fiduciary duty in error reporting
by: Yusrita Zolkefli
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Breach of Fiduciary Duty: The Alternative Remedies
by: Denis S. K Ong
Published: (1999-01-01)