A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction
Introduction. In cases of bone deficiency or osteoporosis, and especially in revision cases, there were only two options for treatment until the impaction bone graft procedure was proposed. These were cemented or cementless femoral prosthesis. In the early 1990s, the use of impaction bone graft with...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Case Reports in Orthopedics |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811593 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849412168093532160 |
|---|---|
| author | Shigeo Ishiguro Kunihiro Asanuma Tatsuya Tamaki Kazuhiro Oinuma Akihiro Sudo |
| author_facet | Shigeo Ishiguro Kunihiro Asanuma Tatsuya Tamaki Kazuhiro Oinuma Akihiro Sudo |
| author_sort | Shigeo Ishiguro |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction. In cases of bone deficiency or osteoporosis, and especially in revision cases, there were only two options for treatment until the impaction bone graft procedure was proposed. These were cemented or cementless femoral prosthesis. In the early 1990s, the use of impaction bone graft with a cemented mantle had gained popularity and had proven to be clinically effective. In Germany, a cementless impaction bone graft procedure using Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stems was devised, and functional scores were similar to conventional cemented Impaction bone grafts. Case presentation. A 48-year-old man presented with femur loosening of a reamed bipolar arthroplasty performed in 1990. The patient was treated with a cementless impaction bone graft using a Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stem in the femur in revision THA surgery, and the calcar was reconstructed by allograft. Results. At five years, the calcar allograft united with the host bone, and the femoral component showed no subsidence. Conclusion. Calcar reconstruction with a strut allograft, aimed at preventing sinking of the stem was key in this operation. Surgical indication for femoral cementless impaction bone graft should be for loosened femoral prosthesis in a type II Paprosky classification, where only the cortical bone of the isthmus is partially affected, cortical thinning does not exist, and it is mechanically strong enough for the allograft tip impaction. The procedure was safely feasible through the direct anterior approach. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5a0abc281b64426bb762bda5ca4ba0c6 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2090-6749 2090-6757 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Case Reports in Orthopedics |
| spelling | doaj-art-5a0abc281b64426bb762bda5ca4ba0c62025-08-20T03:34:31ZengWileyCase Reports in Orthopedics2090-67492090-67572021-01-01202110.1155/2021/88115938811593A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar ReconstructionShigeo Ishiguro0Kunihiro Asanuma1Tatsuya Tamaki2Kazuhiro Oinuma3Akihiro Sudo4Orthopaedic Surgery, Kameyama Medical Center, Mie, JapanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, JapanFunabashi Orthopaedic Hospital, Chiba, JapanFunabashi Orthopaedic Hospital, Chiba, JapanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, JapanIntroduction. In cases of bone deficiency or osteoporosis, and especially in revision cases, there were only two options for treatment until the impaction bone graft procedure was proposed. These were cemented or cementless femoral prosthesis. In the early 1990s, the use of impaction bone graft with a cemented mantle had gained popularity and had proven to be clinically effective. In Germany, a cementless impaction bone graft procedure using Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stems was devised, and functional scores were similar to conventional cemented Impaction bone grafts. Case presentation. A 48-year-old man presented with femur loosening of a reamed bipolar arthroplasty performed in 1990. The patient was treated with a cementless impaction bone graft using a Corail® (DePuy Synthes) stem in the femur in revision THA surgery, and the calcar was reconstructed by allograft. Results. At five years, the calcar allograft united with the host bone, and the femoral component showed no subsidence. Conclusion. Calcar reconstruction with a strut allograft, aimed at preventing sinking of the stem was key in this operation. Surgical indication for femoral cementless impaction bone graft should be for loosened femoral prosthesis in a type II Paprosky classification, where only the cortical bone of the isthmus is partially affected, cortical thinning does not exist, and it is mechanically strong enough for the allograft tip impaction. The procedure was safely feasible through the direct anterior approach.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811593 |
| spellingShingle | Shigeo Ishiguro Kunihiro Asanuma Tatsuya Tamaki Kazuhiro Oinuma Akihiro Sudo A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction Case Reports in Orthopedics |
| title | A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction |
| title_full | A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction |
| title_fullStr | A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction |
| title_short | A Case of Cementless Impaction Bone Graft in a Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Requiring Calcar Reconstruction |
| title_sort | case of cementless impaction bone graft in a revision total hip arthroplasty requiring calcar reconstruction |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8811593 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shigeoishiguro acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction AT kunihiroasanuma acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction AT tatsuyatamaki acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction AT kazuhirooinuma acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction AT akihirosudo acaseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction AT shigeoishiguro caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction AT kunihiroasanuma caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction AT tatsuyatamaki caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction AT kazuhirooinuma caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction AT akihirosudo caseofcementlessimpactionbonegraftinarevisiontotalhiparthroplastyrequiringcalcarreconstruction |