A descriptive study of syphilitic uveitis in patients treated at tertiary hospitals in Johannesburg
Background: Syphilitic uveitis is a ‘great mimicker’ with a myriad of manifestations resembling other forms of inflammation in the eye. A large percentage of patients with syphilitic uveitis in South Africa have HIV co-infection and their clinical features and serological results may be confounded b...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AOSIS
2025-01-01
|
Series: | African Vision and Eye Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/989 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Syphilitic uveitis is a ‘great mimicker’ with a myriad of manifestations resembling other forms of inflammation in the eye. A large percentage of patients with syphilitic uveitis in South Africa have HIV co-infection and their clinical features and serological results may be confounded by the presence of HIV.
Aim: This study aimed to describe the clinical features of patients treated for syphilitic uveitis at two tertiary hospitals in Johannesburg.
Setting: The study was conducted at the ophthalmology departments of two tertiary hospitals in Johannesburg.
Methods: A retrospective descriptive case series of patients admitted for treatment of syphilitic uveitis at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospitals.
Results: From 01 January 2015 to 30 June 2020, 25 patients (44 eyes) were admitted for syphilitic uveitis treatment. Vitritis was the most common sign in 54.5% of the patients (n = 24 eyes) and 23 of these eyes were of HIV positive patients. Anterior chamber cells were in 43.1% of the patients (n = 19 eyes), posterior synechiae in 36.3% (n = 16 eyes), optic disc swelling in 31.8% (n = 14 eyes), pigmentary retinopathy in 18.1% (n = 8 eyes) and ciliary injection in 18.1% (n = 8 eyes). Optic disc swelling was observed in 57.1% (n = 4 eyes) of HIV negative patients. There was an improvement in visual acuity (VA) in 64.3% of eyes (n = 27) and no change in VA in 35.7% (n = 15) of eyes. No deterioration in post-treatment VA was documented.
Conclusion: Majority of the patients admitted for syphilitic uveitis had posterior segment signs, which should prompt a diagnosis of syphilis. The treatment of syphilitic uveitis leads to an improvement in VA.
Contribution: This work contributes to our understanding of syphilitic uveitis presentation in South African hospitals. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2413-3183 2410-1516 |