Socioeconomic inequalities in outcomes, experiences and treatment among adults consulting primary care for a musculoskeletal pain condition: a prospective cohort study

Objectives To estimate the direction and magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in outcome, experience and care among adults consulting for a musculoskeletal pain condition.Design Multicentre, prospective observational cohort with repeated measures at three waves (baseline, 3 months and 6 months af...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dahai Yu, Kelvin P Jordan, Jonathan C Hill, Emma Parry, Simon Wathall, James Bailey, Lindsey Brown, George M Peat, Stephen Dent, Clare Thompson, Ruth Haines, John Haines, Jane Southam, Sue Maddison, Kanta Sandhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2025-07-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/7/e095132.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849467256546787328
author Dahai Yu
Kelvin P Jordan
Jonathan C Hill
Emma Parry
Simon Wathall
James Bailey
Lindsey Brown
George M Peat
Stephen Dent
Clare Thompson
Ruth Haines
John Haines
Jane Southam
Sue Maddison
Kanta Sandhu
author_facet Dahai Yu
Kelvin P Jordan
Jonathan C Hill
Emma Parry
Simon Wathall
James Bailey
Lindsey Brown
George M Peat
Stephen Dent
Clare Thompson
Ruth Haines
John Haines
Jane Southam
Sue Maddison
Kanta Sandhu
collection DOAJ
description Objectives To estimate the direction and magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in outcome, experience and care among adults consulting for a musculoskeletal pain condition.Design Multicentre, prospective observational cohort with repeated measures at three waves (baseline, 3 months and 6 months after index consultation).Setting 30 general practices in North Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent, England.Participants 1875 consecutive, eligible, consenting patients, aged 18 years and over, presenting with a relevant SNOMED CT-coded musculoskeletal pain condition between September 2021 and July 2022.Interventions Standard care.Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome was patient-reported pain and function using the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ score, 0–56). Secondary outcomes were patient experience (overall dissatisfaction with consultation experience, dichotomised) and an indicator of care received (opioid prescription within 14 days of index consultation). Using multilevel models, we examined inequalities in primary and secondary outcomes by area deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation derived from patient residential postcode), before and after adjusting for sociodemographic and survey administration variables, clinical case-mix and selected practice-level covariates.Results Compared with patients from the least deprived neighbourhoods, patients from the most deprived neighbourhoods had significantly poorer MSK-HQ scores at baseline (mean 22.6 (SD 10.4) vs 27.6 (10.1)). At 6 months, the inequality gap in MSK-HQ score widened (difference in mean score after adjustment for all covariates: 1.94; 95% CI: −0.70 to 4.58). Opioid prescription was more common for patients living in the most deprived neighbourhoods (30% vs 19%; fully adjusted OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.08). Only 6% of patients overall reported being dissatisfied with their consultation. Analysis of multiply imputed data produced a similar pattern of findings to complete-case analysis.Conclusions Substantial inequalities in the chronicity, severity and complexity of musculoskeletal pain problems are already present at the time of accessing care. Inequalities in pain and function do not reduce after accessing care and may even widen slightly.Trial registration number ISRCTN18132064; Results.
format Article
id doaj-art-59aa72df2da44071a82728adb48e062d
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-59aa72df2da44071a82728adb48e062d2025-08-20T03:27:43ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552025-07-0115710.1136/bmjopen-2024-095132Socioeconomic inequalities in outcomes, experiences and treatment among adults consulting primary care for a musculoskeletal pain condition: a prospective cohort study Dahai Yu0Kelvin P Jordan1Jonathan C Hill2Emma Parry3Simon Wathall4James Bailey5Lindsey BrownGeorge M Peat6Stephen DentClare Thompson7Ruth HainesJohn HainesJane SouthamSue MaddisonKanta SandhuPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UKPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UKPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UKPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UKPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UKPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UKPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UKPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UKObjectives To estimate the direction and magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in outcome, experience and care among adults consulting for a musculoskeletal pain condition.Design Multicentre, prospective observational cohort with repeated measures at three waves (baseline, 3 months and 6 months after index consultation).Setting 30 general practices in North Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent, England.Participants 1875 consecutive, eligible, consenting patients, aged 18 years and over, presenting with a relevant SNOMED CT-coded musculoskeletal pain condition between September 2021 and July 2022.Interventions Standard care.Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome was patient-reported pain and function using the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ score, 0–56). Secondary outcomes were patient experience (overall dissatisfaction with consultation experience, dichotomised) and an indicator of care received (opioid prescription within 14 days of index consultation). Using multilevel models, we examined inequalities in primary and secondary outcomes by area deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation derived from patient residential postcode), before and after adjusting for sociodemographic and survey administration variables, clinical case-mix and selected practice-level covariates.Results Compared with patients from the least deprived neighbourhoods, patients from the most deprived neighbourhoods had significantly poorer MSK-HQ scores at baseline (mean 22.6 (SD 10.4) vs 27.6 (10.1)). At 6 months, the inequality gap in MSK-HQ score widened (difference in mean score after adjustment for all covariates: 1.94; 95% CI: −0.70 to 4.58). Opioid prescription was more common for patients living in the most deprived neighbourhoods (30% vs 19%; fully adjusted OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.08). Only 6% of patients overall reported being dissatisfied with their consultation. Analysis of multiply imputed data produced a similar pattern of findings to complete-case analysis.Conclusions Substantial inequalities in the chronicity, severity and complexity of musculoskeletal pain problems are already present at the time of accessing care. Inequalities in pain and function do not reduce after accessing care and may even widen slightly.Trial registration number ISRCTN18132064; Results.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/7/e095132.full
spellingShingle Dahai Yu
Kelvin P Jordan
Jonathan C Hill
Emma Parry
Simon Wathall
James Bailey
Lindsey Brown
George M Peat
Stephen Dent
Clare Thompson
Ruth Haines
John Haines
Jane Southam
Sue Maddison
Kanta Sandhu
Socioeconomic inequalities in outcomes, experiences and treatment among adults consulting primary care for a musculoskeletal pain condition: a prospective cohort study
BMJ Open
title Socioeconomic inequalities in outcomes, experiences and treatment among adults consulting primary care for a musculoskeletal pain condition: a prospective cohort study
title_full Socioeconomic inequalities in outcomes, experiences and treatment among adults consulting primary care for a musculoskeletal pain condition: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Socioeconomic inequalities in outcomes, experiences and treatment among adults consulting primary care for a musculoskeletal pain condition: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic inequalities in outcomes, experiences and treatment among adults consulting primary care for a musculoskeletal pain condition: a prospective cohort study
title_short Socioeconomic inequalities in outcomes, experiences and treatment among adults consulting primary care for a musculoskeletal pain condition: a prospective cohort study
title_sort socioeconomic inequalities in outcomes experiences and treatment among adults consulting primary care for a musculoskeletal pain condition a prospective cohort study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/7/e095132.full
work_keys_str_mv AT socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT dahaiyu socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kelvinpjordan socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT jonathanchill socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT emmaparry socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT simonwathall socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT jamesbailey socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT lindseybrown socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT georgempeat socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT stephendent socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT clarethompson socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT ruthhaines socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT johnhaines socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT janesoutham socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT suemaddison socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kantasandhu socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomesexperiencesandtreatmentamongadultsconsultingprimarycareforamusculoskeletalpainconditionaprospectivecohortstudy