Direction of reading, not writing, shapes concepts of time
It is commonly stated that the direction in which we read and write influences our conceptualisation of the flow of time. However, research to date has only established a causal link between reading direction and temporal thought, leaving out the question of whether the act of writing indeed shapes...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Language and Cognition |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980825100082/type/journal_article |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850217653369569280 |
|---|---|
| author | Jenna Crossley Emanuel Bylund |
| author_facet | Jenna Crossley Emanuel Bylund |
| author_sort | Jenna Crossley |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | It is commonly stated that the direction in which we read and write influences our conceptualisation of the flow of time. However, research to date has only established a causal link between reading direction and temporal thought, leaving out the question of whether the act of writing indeed shapes the mental timeline. The current study addresses this gap by examining whether writing direction modulates how events are mapped onto time. Consistent with previous findings, results from a reading experiment showed that participants who read mirror texts (right-to-left orthography) indeed mapped time as flowing leftwards. However, contrary to prevailing assumptions, results from a series of writing experiments showed that participants assigned to a mirror writing condition (right-to-left orthography) displayed the same left-to-right mapping of the flow of time as participants in the standard writing condition (left-to-right orthography), despite progressive increases in mirror-writing training. It is suggested that the act of writing does not shape time concepts because it is not unambiguously unidirectional: the fine-motoric action of forming individual letters is multidirectional and thus interferes with the lateral time–space association obtained with the gross-motoric action of moving the hand/arm sideways. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-597e82a97a774922aaffc0a142ebeb12 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1866-9808 1866-9859 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Language and Cognition |
| spelling | doaj-art-597e82a97a774922aaffc0a142ebeb122025-08-20T02:08:00ZengCambridge University PressLanguage and Cognition1866-98081866-98592025-01-011710.1017/langcog.2025.10008Direction of reading, not writing, shapes concepts of timeJenna Crossley0Emanuel Bylund1Department of General Linguistics, https://ror.org/05bk57929 Stellenbosch University , Stellenbosch, South AfricaDepartment of General Linguistics, https://ror.org/05bk57929 Stellenbosch University , Stellenbosch, South AfricaIt is commonly stated that the direction in which we read and write influences our conceptualisation of the flow of time. However, research to date has only established a causal link between reading direction and temporal thought, leaving out the question of whether the act of writing indeed shapes the mental timeline. The current study addresses this gap by examining whether writing direction modulates how events are mapped onto time. Consistent with previous findings, results from a reading experiment showed that participants who read mirror texts (right-to-left orthography) indeed mapped time as flowing leftwards. However, contrary to prevailing assumptions, results from a series of writing experiments showed that participants assigned to a mirror writing condition (right-to-left orthography) displayed the same left-to-right mapping of the flow of time as participants in the standard writing condition (left-to-right orthography), despite progressive increases in mirror-writing training. It is suggested that the act of writing does not shape time concepts because it is not unambiguously unidirectional: the fine-motoric action of forming individual letters is multidirectional and thus interferes with the lateral time–space association obtained with the gross-motoric action of moving the hand/arm sideways.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980825100082/type/journal_articlemental metaphorsmental timelineorthographyreadingspatial cognition |
| spellingShingle | Jenna Crossley Emanuel Bylund Direction of reading, not writing, shapes concepts of time Language and Cognition mental metaphors mental timeline orthography reading spatial cognition |
| title | Direction of reading, not writing, shapes concepts of time |
| title_full | Direction of reading, not writing, shapes concepts of time |
| title_fullStr | Direction of reading, not writing, shapes concepts of time |
| title_full_unstemmed | Direction of reading, not writing, shapes concepts of time |
| title_short | Direction of reading, not writing, shapes concepts of time |
| title_sort | direction of reading not writing shapes concepts of time |
| topic | mental metaphors mental timeline orthography reading spatial cognition |
| url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980825100082/type/journal_article |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jennacrossley directionofreadingnotwritingshapesconceptsoftime AT emanuelbylund directionofreadingnotwritingshapesconceptsoftime |